William S. Rosecrans

Rosecrans was a recent convert to Catholicism. It is a cliche, but he really had the fervor of a convert. You have to pity the staff who had to rise & shine in a few hours.
Rosecrans, born in 1819, had converted to Catholicism in his late twenties. I wouldn't call that recent relative to 1861.
 
Could Rosecrans have thought that sharing his Catholic faith would inspire those around him to fight more inspired? That perhaps God was actually fighting on the side of the North. Stonewall Jackson I believe from studying his life thought God was on the side of the South. Excuse my ignorance but I'm just yearning to learn. Thank you all again!!!
Rosecrans did little public proselytizing. Catholicism was associated with Irish and to a lesser extent German immigrants. Rosecrans was not descended from either group. His was an intellectual conversion. This is discussed in my book.
In general he advocated public religiosity.
His religious beliefs did influence his attitude towards slavery. He was the first prominent Democrat general to support emancipation.
The Catholic Church -like every national religious denomination- was nuanced on emancipation. However General Rosecrans, his brother Sylverster- a priest, bishop and convert, and Bishop Purcell of Cincinnati were strong anti slavery advocates. General Rosecrans is a fascinating and Important personage in the war. Sad that he is all but unknown. Sadder that he is attacked so much.
 
I simply do not understand why people talk about Missionary Ridge in this way when Thomas had exactly as much to do with that attack as Grant did, which is nothing. Neither of them ordered it.
The soldiers of the AOTC saw it as vindication however. Perhaps they were still inspired by their dismissed leader.
 
Besides the need for all the sleep you can get in a war, Rosecrans was being obsessive about a topic that few of his subordinates were interested in, and probably none shared his views or faith. He could have just as soon been fixated on astronomy or astrology, and it would have been little better.

It's said that none are so evangelical as adult converts, but it's worth noting that hyperfixation and inability to "read the room" fit with the Aspergers theory I mentioned earlier.
Might find the discussion on Rosecrans' religiosity in my book relevant.
 
In fairness, the material contributions of Hooker's Easterners and Sherman's Army of the Tennessee were far less than those of Thomas' men when it came to relieving the supply situation at Chattanooga.

From September to October, the Army of the Cumberland sustained itself for over a month upon a supply line which consisted of a single road stretching from Bridgeport into the Sequatchie Valley, and from there over the difficult Walden's Ridge into the town. The concept of forging a new supply line via Brown's Ferry, the famous "Cracker Line," originated with Baldy Smith, then Chief Engineer of the Army of the Cumberland. Additionally, it was troops from the Army of the Cumberland who would ultimately make the crossing at Brown's Ferry and secure the bridgehead across the river. While Orland Smith's 11th Corps brigade and John Geary's 12th Corps division would fight and fight well during the night of the following day at Wauhatchie, Sherman's troops would not arrive until another three weeks. When it came to surviving upon their existing line of supply, and creating and seizing a bold, more efficient line of supply, it originated from Army of the Cumberland officers and was carried out by Army of the Cumberland enlisted men.
The Cracker Line originated with Rosecrans not Smith. Pg 20 from the Report of the War Dept Board commissioned to study the issue
6C7941FF-2620-4302-9F12-9213CC4EDBFE.jpeg
 
There was a lot of prejudice against Catholics in 19th century America, especially because most Catholics were Irish immigrants. In the decades following the American Civil War there was a lot of Italian immigration that was the target of similar prejudice. Anti-Catholic prejudice remained strong into the mid-20th century (we can't discuss it here, but I recommend looking into 1920s politics for more on this issue).

Catholics were a particular target of the Know Nothings (American Party) of the 1850s.

Besides the correlation with certain ethnic groups that were the target of prejudice, the loyalty of Catholics was questioned because of the Pope.

Here's a starting point on the subject:

I don't know that any particular Protestant denomination was dominant, North or South, in the 1860s.

That's not to say it was impossible to successful as a non-WASP.

By way of comparison: Ely Parker was on Grant's staff and became a Brevet Brigadier General yet I hope nobody would think that somehow disproves widespread prejudice against Native Americans in the 19th century.
It is amazing how much religious diversity there was in the US in the 19th century. Most of it had some Christian tinge.
 
If anything was being discussed up till 2 in the morning it should have been battle plans.
Maybe drinking
parties as in Grant's army in 1862? Even if one doubts Grant indulged he at least tolerated it. Sourcing upon request. ( I sometimes feel sourcing is a waste of time here)
But Rosecrans actually created what David Powell called an " Incubator of Innovation"
I do think Rosecrans' religiosity hurts him today even if people don't know much about it.
 
The agreement - brokered by Washburne- was that Grant being made Lt General would would keep him from challenging Lincoln.
Sourcing upon request. ( I sometimes feel sourcing is a waste of time here)
Since sourcing is important to you, perhaps you could source this claim that Lincoln promoted Grant to Lt Gen for political reasons rather than for wanting to win the war.
 
I simply do not understand why people talk about Missionary Ridge in this way when Thomas had exactly as much to do with that attack as Grant did, which is nothing. Neither of them ordered it.
True - but his troops carried it out and that still showed up Grant and Sherman. Not so much who gave an order but who took it upon themselves to do the right thing.
 
Since sourcing is important to you, perhaps you could source this claim that Lincoln promoted Grant to Lt Gen for political reasons rather than for wanting to win the war.
Sure. It's in my book btw. Lincoln knew little about Grant. May take a day or so to get to it. ( I do have other things to do in my life)
 
Taking Chattanooga had everything to do with the fall of Atlanta. Read up about Sherman's logistics base there for 1864.
Atlanta is the product of what happened in Tennessee in 1863. Sherman is given a gigantic army and takes longer to get to Atlanta than it took Rosecrans to get from Murfreesboro to Chattanooga. Rosecrans wins the battle for the permanent possession of Chattanooga. ( Rebels get West Chickamauga Creek) Part of Sherman's army is the technologically advanced Army of the Cumberland.
Rosecrans then comes up with the plan to open the Cracker Line. He is relieved before it can be carried out but after important elections in Ohio. Politics.
 
So taking Nashville had everything to do with the fall of Chattanooga. And taking Fort Donelson had everything to do with taking Nashville. And Grant took Fort Donelson...
There is a distance between Nashville and Chattanooga. Interesting terrain. Also an opposing army. Makes a nice fall trip.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top