William S. Rosecrans

Could Rosecrans have thought that sharing his Catholic faith would inspire those around him to fight more inspired? That perhaps God was actually fighting on the side of the North. Stonewall Jackson I believe from studying his life thought God was on the side of the South. Excuse my ignorance but I'm just yearning to learn. Thank you all again!!!
 
One of Rosecrans' particular gifts that we have not touched on was his popularity among the troops. They called him "Old Rosey." Because of burns suffered when a novel coal oil lamp design he invented that blew up, he spent (+/-) a year in bed in 1859. It left him with facial scars he covered with a beard. It also fixed him with a permanent sardonic grin. Whatever the situation, he appeared to be mildly amused by it all.

Old Rosey's connection with the troops is exemplified in a chance encounter with the 9th Michigan. Somewhere in. Kentucky, the 9th was cooling its heals wait for a train. Their hyperactive band was giving an impromptu concert. Out of nowhere Rosecrans & staff rode up.

He recognized them as the "Old Mackerels" & commended their fighting record. He asked if they were short on anything, shoes, etc.

If they needed anything, he told them, don't quit complaining until you get it. Beyond the fixed grin, Rosecrans genuinely was at ease amongst his men. They knew that he made every effort to see they were properly equipped & fed.

After he remounted, the Old Mackerels gave Old Rosey three huzzahs & a tiger growl as a send off.

Members of the Army of the Cumberland knew that Rosecrans valued their lives. The theme of this thread is strategy. Nowhere in Rosecrans' strategic or tactical doctrine was there any space for the repeated 50% casualty banzai charges of his opponents. Even at Chickamauga, Bragg lost more men wounded & KIA than Rosecrans did.

Rosecrans defeated Lee more by marching than fighting & liberated (+/-) 40% of VA. At the loss of 550 casualties, he secured Middle Tennessee. Crossing the Tennessee & maneuvering Bragg out of Chattanooga was the fruit of an orchestrated deception from the Sequatchie Valley. By inflicting crippling casualties & safely falling back on Chattanooga, Rosecrans turned Chickamauga into a tactical setback. Due to the robust logistical system of the Department of the Cumberland, the army withstood the siege & delivered a smashing victory. Not many generals could boast of even one of those accomplishments.

Note: Re: 9th Michigan Regimental History by Charles Bennett. It is one of the best regimental histories I have read. It also happens that Bennet & his comrades camped & fought on my yard.

Bennet himself had an interesting war. He became a sergeant just in time to be surrendered to Forrest by a callow Minnesota colonel. He veteranized & was a brevet major with the 13th USCT at Nashville. He considered our neighborhood along the Maney family's carriage lane the best campground of the war.
 
Last edited:
After decades of study I have concluded that Rosecrans was an example of the Peter Principle of rising to the level of incompetence. The engineer that made him such a brilliant organizer prevented him from becoming a brilliant combat commander. My conclusion is that an ideal division of labor would have been Rosecrans commanding the Department of the Cumberland & Thomas as commander of the army. They could have maintained their very productive partnership while each exercised his special gifts.

People who measure such things rate Rosecrans' IQ as the highest among CW generals... which is also the straight line for many jokes. He had an unhealthy habit of keeping his young staff up until 2:00am discussing Catholic theology. Under the stress of combat he would ride forward under fire. He would have the brains of staff members splattered onto his coat. This show of bravado deeply impressed the troops. Three cheers & a tiger greeted his appearance. Unfortunately, the stress caused him to shout nonsense orders in a jackhammer stutter to dumbfounded officers.

At Chickamauga a characteristically Rosecrans solution to his dashing around the battle space was implemented. The brilliant James Garfield had a War game-like board with unit counters on it. As reports came in, the pieces were moved accordingly. It was a preview of the aerial / satellite / drone real-time situational awareness of a modernHQ. It was a misplaced counter that gave Longstreet his opening.

Objectively, the compelling conclusion is that Rosecrans was not the man to break the siege & lead the advance to Atlanta. Dana's reports have been called a clinical report of the effects of stress & sleep deprivation. Grant's only criticism of the plans Rosecrans had for breaking the siege was that he had not implemented them.

In my judgement, Rosecrans was like a brilliant entrepreneur who had to step aside to let the enterprise be managed in a business like way.
Rosecrans of course did come up with the plan to break the siege at Chattanooga. Grant never claimed to have come up with the plan. Baldy Smith did. A War Dept Board investigated the claims and came down on the side of Rosecrans. Bad history. Not to mention undocumented.
 
Last edited:
Rosecrans is an important yet controversial figure in the War. Controversial ironically from a Union point of view. Albert Castel - a leading historian of the Western theater- said that a biographer of Rosecrans would need to be courageous. His word and his italics. The problem is his adversarial relationship with Grant. One criticizes Grant today at one's own peril. No problem; history should be critical but documented.
And yet Frank Varney in his two volumes has risen to the task of taking on Grant, an examination that is much needed. His take on Grant versus Rosecrans in his forst volume is on target. Keep in mind that Grant slandered Lew Wallace for Shiloh and did not recant that until years later. Grant was an outstanding commander but he was also a human being with all of the foils therein.
 
That gap wasn't a strategic issue. It wasn't even really a tactical issue. It was a communication and confusion issue.



Dangerously divided his army the same way he had done so successfully twice before.

Not terribly differently from the way Lee divided his army to invade Pennsylvania.



Rosecrans is criticized for not starting Tullahoma sooner and not following up on Tullahoma sooner...

...and also criticized for aggressively continuing to pursue Bragg's reeling army rather than consolidating his gains after capturing Chattanooga.
And Napoleon divided his army at Austerlitz and even more at Jena-Auerstadt and won tremendous victories at both. One needs to understand the terrain at Chattanooga and north Georgia.
 
A little bit more trivia concerning Rosecrans…he was apparently offered the vice presidential spot under Lincoln in the election of 1864. However, due to a glitch with the telegraph service and/or possible shenanigans from Edwin Stanton, Rosecrans' response to Lincoln never arrived. In any event, one has to wonder how history might have changed if he had become President after Lincoln's assassination.
The story is Garfield offered him the Vice Presidency in 1864. In those day the convention picked the candidates. Garfield was an influential figure at that convention. All messages went through the war Dept so it is possible that Stanton intercepted Rosecrans' response. Garfield believed someone interfered.
It is important to note that this is all after Chickamauga. Garfield still respected and valued Rosecrans.
 
And yet Frank Varney in his two volumes has risen to the task of taking on Grant, an examination that is much needed. His take on Grant versus Rosecrans in his forst volume is on target. Keep in mind that Grant slandered Lew Wallace for Shiloh and did not recant that until years later. Grant was an outstanding commander but he was also a human being with all of the foils therein.
Grant was lucky to survive 1862 and early 1863. Having Elihu Washburne in his corner more than helped. It was crucial.
 
Last edited:
Besides the need for all the sleep you can get in a war, Rosecrans was being obsessive about a topic that few of his subordinates were interested in, and probably none shared his views or faith. He could have just as soon been fixated on astronomy or astrology, and it would have been little better.

It's said that none are so evangelical as adult converts, but it's worth noting that hyperfixation and inability to "read the room" fit with the Aspergers theory I mentioned earlier.
Excellent points! The bigger issue is that Rosecrans did not need to keep his staff up this late - or himself for that matter - when bigger fish needed frying - no matter the discussion topics.
 
Grant was lucky to survive 1862?and early 1863. Having Elihu Washburne in his corner more than helped. It was crucial.
As one who leads tours and military staff rides at Fort Donelson on a regualr basis you are quite correct. One of the Army's Nine Principles of War is "Unity of Command," and while Grant had that in the field, his boss, Henry Halleck, tried to stab him in the back before, during and even after the victory of February 16th, 1982. Think of what happens to him - and by extension Sherman - if Grant loses at Shiloh? He's gone! Sherman never gets his cover to rise higher up. So who leads the Union armies in 1864????
 
Excellent points! The bigger issue is that Rosecrans did not need to keep his staff up this late - or himself for that matter - when bigger fish needed frying - no matter the discussion topics.
I cover Rosecrans' religious views and how people around him reacted in my book. The effect was positive. Rosecrans didn't have theological discussions at the expense of his army's other needs. . Garfield was a lay minister in the Disciples of Christ church and had studied theology. It would be natural for them to discuss religion.
There were days and weeks of down time during campaigns. You might find what occupied Grant's army staff in late 1862 interesting.
 
As one who leads tours and military staff rides at Fort Donelson on a regualr basis you are quite correct. One of the Army's Nine Principles of War is "Unity of Command," and while Grant had that in the field, his boss, Henry Halleck, tried to stab him in the back before, during and even after the victory of February 16th, 1982. Think of what happens to him - and by extension Sherman - if Grant loses at Shiloh? He's gone! Sherman never gets his cover to rise higher up. So who leads the Union armies in 1864????
Don't forget Iuka and Corinth in fall of 1862 where it could be said Rosecrans' victories saved Grant's command. Then there's Grant's bad early 1863.
Rosecrans - the belittled subject of this thread- would have been the man to take Atlanta. Given an army merely approaching Sherman's in size in 1864 he would have taken Atlanta way before late August. Compare the Atlanta Campaign with the Tullahoma and Chickamauga Campaigns. Meade also would have had an important role. This assumes they have political support. However Rosecrans and Meade are Democrats. A Republican Congress doesn't want that.
In fact this is why Grant survived. The Republicans had to have a hero. Pope and Fremont were early attempts at that.
However the key is Elihu Washburne. Unknown today he was arguably the most powerful man in the House of Representatives. He picked Grant solely because they both were living in Galena Illinois when the War broke out.
All of this is documented in my book.
 
Folks - thanks for bringing up this topic about a general whom I have grown fond of over the many years and one that needed a fresh re-examination and thanks to David Moore we have one. I have been over the ground from Nashville to Chattanooga and from Chattanooga to Atlanta for decades just driving from place to place and leading Civil War tours of the Atlanta Campaign for years as well as the Tullahoma Campaign and even Chickamauga/Chattanooga twice (with the amazing Jim Ogden). I have led several Tullahoma tours for civilians including Dave Powell and Eric Wittenberg along with Army staff rides of the campaign. Michael Bradley is my mentor for this campaign as it was he who wrote the first book on the topic and and my behest, Blue & Gray magazine redid their Tullahoma Campaign issue some years ago with Mike writing it and I contributing with an article and the tour. This is simply a fascinating campaign and as one who also studies Napoleon and Frederick the Great, is one that both of them would have been proud to have lead.

Several issues I see here that need to be addressed. I don't thatink that many of the posters have even been over the terrain from Murfreesboro to Chattanooga nor do I think some truly understand what Rosecrans was trying to really do in the Tullahoma Campaign. First, the reason why he delayed after Stones River to late June 1863 was several fold, logistics being paramount (and I rate him as the third best logistician of the Civil War). He had to rebuild railroads and bridges back to Louisville. The Gallatin South Tunnel, dropped by Morgan, needed rebuilding which took three months. The source of this headache was two-fold - CS cavalry raiders like Morgan, Forrest and Wheeler plus some guerrillas and the water levels of the Cumberland River from the Ohio to Nashville. No locks and dams like today - if you had little rain the water levels would be below the draft of large river boats which needed more than 7 feet under their keels. This was why Rosecrans started the extension of the Nashville & Northwestern RR from Kingston Springs west of Nashville to Johnsonville on the Tennessee River. This took months to build but as the Tennessee River was bigger than the Cumberland (and still is today) it was worth it and Johnsonville became a major Union supply depot for the Nashville Depot.

In addition to building up logistics, Rosecrans need to rebuild his cavalry arm and got David Stanley, a pre-war veteran of the US Army's 1st US Cavalry, to take charge of his cavalry forces that had been beaten like a drum by Confederate cavalry to that point. Rosecrans went to war with the War Department trying to get Stanley better horses (they kept giving him **** mounts which, as Rosey pointed out, cost the same as good mounts so why not get good mounts instead?) and, if not more cavalry units then things like repeating rifles to use as a force multiplier. His telegram exchanges with the WD show how out of touch the folks in Washington really were with the situation in Tennessee at the time - Henry Halleck *****ed about the cost of his telegrams! After one request for more cavalry, QM General Montgomery Meigs replied suggesting that Rosecrans put infantrymen into wagons to deal with raiding Confederate cavalry. His response was brilliant - "That would do well on Pennsylvania Avenue but not in middle Tennessee." After Rosey took Chattanooga, Meigs came down, saw the terrain first hand and apologized for not understanding what the Army of the Cumberland had been dealing with. Building up the cavalry was not only a protecting the logistics issue but it was also a striking arm issue and Rosecrans wanted his cavalry to be able to go on the offensive in conjunction with his army when the time came. Meanwhile, Stanley was forming a potent cavalry arm with excellent brigade commanders but mediocre division commanders Robert Mitchell and John B. Turchin, both of whom would later be replaced. By March 1863, Stanley told Rosecrans that his troopers wer eready to hit the field and their first misson was to test Bragg's defense line which ran from McMinnville in the east toward Columbia in the west. For several months, Stanley's troopers, sometime with infantry support, attacked points along the line which served to give his men needed field experience but also to gather intel as to where Bragg was the weakest. Turns out that after several victories against Bragg's right held by John Hunt Morgan, gave Rosey the seeds for where his Tullahoma planning was to attack with his main thrust. By contrast the Union attacks on Bragg's left, held by Forrest and Van Dorn (until his death) were repulsed virtually every time.

So now with his cavalry arm in place and his logistics secure and his army reinforced, Rosecrans planned to execute the Tullahoma Campaign The main attack would be by Crittenden's Corps moving east/southeast from Murfreesboro through Gillie's Gap with the goal being Manchester. From Manchester the next goal was Allisonia/Estill Springs which is where Bragg's railroad supply line crossed the Elk River. The goal was to force Bragg to fight for his line of supply on ground of Rosey's choosing and hopefully smash Bragg's army. The other Corps of Thomas and McCook were feints designed to fix Bragg's center in place with Granger backing up the cavalry movement towards Shelbyville. The friction of war set in on the opening day when it began to rain, and as Rhea noted here, a 500 year rain event, or as one of Rosey's men stated, "not just a regular rain but a Baptist downpour!" This slowed Crittenden, who had the toughest terrain to deal with (drive through this area sometime!!!) and he bogged down going only a few miles in several days. As we know Wilder blew through the defenses of Hoover's Gap and gave Rosey a big break and Rosey was swift enough of thought to move Thomas to the main force column and bring McCook over from Liberty Gap to follow behind him. Manchester was still the target but the rains just messed the roads and finally Bragg figured it out and reacted. So Rosey's plan was forced to change from smashing Bragg to getting him out of Middle TN altogether. This is what took place.

After this, Rosecrans had to rebuild track torn up by Bragg's retreat as well as bridges including the big one over the Tennessee River at Bridgeport which would not get rebuilt until the winter of 1863/1864. That all took time to do and about a month after Tullahoma had concluded, Rosecrans moved on Chattanooga and took it without a shot fired. The plan of using three or more maneuver columns worked twice for him as it gave the enemy pause as to where the real main attack was coming from. The issue in north Georgia was even bigger mountains and further apart gaps in them which gave Bragg the idea of defending in place and going after each column if possible. Plus he was massively reinforced. There is nothing that Rosecrans did here that I would not have tried as well. You have to balance risk with gains made by aggressive movement and what can possibly be achieved.

Rhea has waxed well here about the amazing traits of the Army of the Cumberland which, in my opinion as well as that of a couple NPS historians, Rhea and some others, was probably the most advanced of the Union field armies on several levels. Rhea's post about lines of sight communication with signal flags is key here and Rosey used the terrain to its best for this. Some years ago, Rhea too me to a ridge west of Murfreesboro to where one signal station was (and Granger's HQ if I have that correct). From the ridge top looking east you could easily see the cupola of the courthouse in downtown Murfreesboro, also a signal station and about ten miles further east Pilot Knob also a signal station and Rosey's final one of the line in that direction. To the west was Roper's Knob by Franklin and the signal line went even further west. So getting a message from the furthest west signal station to Pilot Knob would take only minutes. Rhea gave a signals demo to an Army staff ride I conducted some years ago and to this day some of the attendees who I am friends with remain amazed, one officer, now a major, actually writing a post-ride report about how the Army should go back to signal flags as a back up for comms today. Rhea has forgotten more about Rosey's Signal Corps than any of us has ever known to begin with and he remains by go-to guy for this for any tours/staff rides I do for the campaign.

Until you get eyes onto this terrain, drive around and through it and see the signal line hilltops, the road gaps and surrounding terrain you simply cannot understand the Tullahoma and Chattanooga Campaigns at all. Nor can you fully comprehend what Rosecrans was dealing with at the time. Again, Meigs apologized to him once he got down there and saw it for himself! Additionally, the land itself in the area in and around the Highland Rim is of a clay like consistency which, in heavy rains, turns to goo. Also, the limestone underpinnings of the top soil is very shallow and when it rains a good bit there even today the water backs up and causes flooding. Some years ago, after a couple days of rain, I took the Columbus, OH CWRT on a Tullahoma tour and one road that I wanted to use heading south from Christiana to the Railroad Gap was flooded so we had to drop that part. There was standing water everywhere that day! I have done another tour right after significant rain and the same thing happened which gave us all a good bit of detail as to what Rosey was dealing with when the campaign began.

Two last things. First, Rosey's Tullahoma Campaign began before the battle of Gettysburg by a week and ended on July 4th. This coincided with the surrender of Vicksburg and the end of Gettysburg (but not the long retreat). So Tullahoma was well within these other events. Secondly, one poster here noted that had Rosecrans moved sooner then Bragg could not have detached reinforcements to other places. Right before Stones River, the CS War Department ordered Stevenson's Division, Bragg's largest by far, to Vicksburg. Right before Tullahoma they ordered another sent to Mississippi and Grierson's Raid forced the break up of the CS Cavalry Corps with another division being sent to Mississippi. We will never know if the CS War Department would have left these units with Bragg had he moved sooner. But with the issues Rosecrans was dealing with that I have outlined above, I am not sure he could have moved sooner. The one battle that I think was most affected by the loss of troops was Stones River; Bragg really could have used that large division there.

Secondly, Brian Wills is a friend of mine and he heard my program on the Tullahoma Campaign given to the Cobb County CWRT in Georgia before Covid. I asked him his thoughts about Rosecrans and the Army of the Cumberland that he built with regards to George Thomas (whom Wills has written a bio) what Thomas would have thought about Rosecrans. He stated categorically that the AOC of Thomas was great because of Rosecrans and Thomas fully knew that and appreciated that.

Rhea has mentioned how the rank and file of the AOC felt about Rosecrans. Here is another source -
Major James Connolly, 123rd Ill. Mtd. Infantry (Wilder), "we don't look for defeat, we don't count on a retreat; with Rosecrans to lead we think we can go anywhere in the Confederacy."
 
Don't forget Iuka and Corinth in fall of 1862 where it could be said Rosecrans' victories saved Grant's command. Then there's Grant's bad early 1863.
Rosecrans - the belittled subject of this thread- would have been the man to take Atlanta. Given an army merely approaching Sherman's in size in 1864 he would have taken Atlanta way before late August. Compare the Atlanta Campaign with the Tullahoma and Chickamauga Campaigns. Meade also would have had an important role. This assumes they have political support. However Rosecrans and Meade are Democrats. A Republican Congress doesn't want that.
In fact this is why Grant survived. The Republicans had to have a hero. Pope and Fremont were early attempts at that.
However the key is Elihu Washburne. Unknown today he was arguably the most powerful man in the House of Representatives. He picked Grant solely because they both were living in Galena Illinois when the War broke out.
All of this is documented in my book.
Fine points all. But if Grant gets fired by losing at Shiloh 1863 and Grant never happens. But your point is still good in that even then Grant might be at risk. Part of the problem that I don't think many today understand is the rivalry between Union armies. Grant is Army of the Tennessee and then it is Sherman's and then McPherson's, all picked to lead by Grant and Sherman. The Army of the Cumberland is the old Army of the Ohio and rivals even as far back as Fort Donelson where Halleck has to eat some crow and borrow two brigades from Buell to reinforce Grant's army which was too small to really take the fort. Buell gives Grant sufficient manpower for Shiloh's second day (even though Grant stated he would have attacked anyway and I think he would have). So you have some Army of the Ohio cred versus the Army of the Tennesse starting here but you can go back as far was Wildcat Mountain and Mill Springs in western Kentucky which were big Union victories for the Army of the Ohio and George Thomas. Fast forward to the siege of Chattanooga where the Army of the Cumberland was bottled up and over to save them comes the Army of the Tennessee and the 11th and 12th Corps of the Army of the Potomac. Now that adds another rivalry dimension here - these two Union corps from an army that had won basically one battle at the time and had been throttled in several others before this time versus Union armies of the west that had won every battle they had fought from the start. Thomas then makes Grant eat crow when his AOC shatters Bragg's center on Missionary Ridge while Sherman, the guy picked to do the main attack, gets slammed shut by Cleburne and other units.

This even manifests itself in the Atlanta Campaign where Sherman, ex-Army of the Tennessee, gives McPherson the cherry jobs while making Thomas and the AOC do the **** work and, as Albert Castel pointed out in his Atlanta writings, Joe Hooker's 20th Corps does a stellar job in this campaign, even more than the Army of the Tennessee and the vaunted 15th Corps of the AOC.

I think besides Elihu Washburne, who indeed is a key figure for Grant, once Grant gets Lincoln's attention, Grant has even bigger political cover.
 
Thomas then makes Grant eat crow when his AOC shatters Bragg's center on Missionary Ridge
I simply do not understand why people talk about Missionary Ridge in this way when Thomas had exactly as much to do with that attack as Grant did, which is nothing. Neither of them ordered it.
 
Grant was lucky to survive 1862 and early 1863. Having Elihu Washburne in his corner more than helped. It was crucial.
This is simply not true. Washburne was ready to give up on Grant during the attempts on Vicksburg, and yet Lincoln stuck with Grant. Washburne was important in Grant's career but the value of his advocacy shouldn't be overstated. Washburne was also an advocate for Hurlbut, and that didn't exactly produce great results for Hurlbut.
 
Fine points all. But if Grant gets fired by losing at Shiloh 1863 and Grant never happens. But your point is still good in that even then Grant might be at risk. Part of the problem that I don't think many today understand is the rivalry between Union armies. Grant is Army of the Tennessee and then it is Sherman's and then McPherson's, all picked to lead by Grant and Sherman. The Army of the Cumberland is the old Army of the Ohio and rivals even as far back as Fort Donelson where Halleck has to eat some crow and borrow two brigades from Buell to reinforce Grant's army which was too small to really take the fort. Buell gives Grant sufficient manpower for Shiloh's second day (even though Grant stated he would have attacked anyway and I think he would have). So you have some Army of the Ohio cred versus the Army of the Tennesse starting here but you can go back as far was Wildcat Mountain and Mill Springs in western Kentucky which were big Union victories for the Army of the Ohio and George Thomas. Fast forward to the siege of Chattanooga where the Army of the Cumberland was bottled up and over to save them comes the Army of the Tennessee and the 11th and 12th Corps of the Army of the Potomac. Now that adds another rivalry dimension here - these two Union corps from an army that had won basically one battle at the time and had been throttled in several others before this time versus Union armies of the west that had won every battle they had fought from the start. Thomas then makes Grant eat crow when his AOC shatters Bragg's center on Missionary Ridge while Sherman, the guy picked to do the main attack, gets slammed shut by Cleburne and other units.

This even manifests itself in the Atlanta Campaign where Sherman, ex-Army of the Tennessee, gives McPherson the cherry jobs while making Thomas and the AOC do the **** work and, as Albert Castel pointed out in his Atlanta writings, Joe Hooker's 20th Corps does a stellar job in this campaign, even more than the Army of the Tennessee and the vaunted 15th Corps of the AOC.

I think besides Elihu Washburne, who indeed is a key figure for Grant, once Grant gets Lincoln's attention, Grant has even bigger political cover.
Lincoln knew little about Grant. The agreement - brokered by Washburne- was that Grant being made Lt General would would keep him from challenging Lincoln. Grant wasn't politically ambitious but Washburne was. Grant was simply following a path made by Washburne.
Not pretty stuff but power politics rarely is.
What makes this worse I think is that it occurred during a War. Politics influenced the Mexican War as well.
The false notion is that only Grant could have won the War. Indeed the Confederacy had almost no chance after 1861. The last hope would have been Lincoln's defeat in 1864 but the fall of Atlanta snuffed that out.
Atlanta fell because of what happened in Tennessee 1863 - under Rosecrans.
Lincoln's main contribution IMO is that he would not agree to anything short of total victory with emancipation. That came at a high cost.
 
Lincoln knew little about Grant. The agreement - brokered by Washburne- was that Grant being made Lt General would would keep him from challenging Lincoln.
Any actual documentation for this claim? I think it is extremely insulting to Lincoln to claim that he made Grant the Lt General only for political reasons.
 
Folks - thanks for bringing up this topic about a general whom I have grown fond of over the many years and one that needed a fresh re-examination and thanks to David Moore we have one. I have been over the ground from Nashville to Chattanooga and from Chattanooga to Atlanta for decades just driving from place to place and leading Civil War tours of the Atlanta Campaign for years as well as the Tullahoma Campaign and even Chickamauga/Chattanooga twice (with the amazing Jim Ogden). I have led several Tullahoma tours for civilians including Dave Powell and Eric Wittenberg along with Army staff rides of the campaign. Michael Bradley is my mentor for this campaign as it was he who wrote the first book on the topic and and my behest, Blue & Gray magazine redid their Tullahoma Campaign issue some years ago with Mike writing it and I contributing with an article and the tour. This is simply a fascinating campaign and as one who also studies Napoleon and Frederick the Great, is one that both of them would have been proud to have lead.

Several issues I see here that need to be addressed. I don't thatink that many of the posters have even been over the terrain from Murfreesboro to Chattanooga nor do I think some truly understand what Rosecrans was trying to really do in the Tullahoma Campaign. First, the reason why he delayed after Stones River to late June 1863 was several fold, logistics being paramount (and I rate him as the third best logistician of the Civil War). He had to rebuild railroads and bridges back to Louisville. The Gallatin South Tunnel, dropped by Morgan, needed rebuilding which took three months. The source of this headache was two-fold - CS cavalry raiders like Morgan, Forrest and Wheeler plus some guerrillas and the water levels of the Cumberland River from the Ohio to Nashville. No locks and dams like today - if you had little rain the water levels would be below the draft of large river boats which needed more than 7 feet under their keels. This was why Rosecrans started the extension of the Nashville & Northwestern RR from Kingston Springs west of Nashville to Johnsonville on the Tennessee River. This took months to build but as the Tennessee River was bigger than the Cumberland (and still is today) it was worth it and Johnsonville became a major Union supply depot for the Nashville Depot.

In addition to building up logistics, Rosecrans need to rebuild his cavalry arm and got David Stanley, a pre-war veteran of the US Army's 1st US Cavalry, to take charge of his cavalry forces that had been beaten like a drum by Confederate cavalry to that point. Rosecrans went to war with the War Department trying to get Stanley better horses (they kept giving him **** mounts which, as Rosey pointed out, cost the same as good mounts so why not get good mounts instead?) and, if not more cavalry units then things like repeating rifles to use as a force multiplier. His telegram exchanges with the WD show how out of touch the folks in Washington really were with the situation in Tennessee at the time - Henry Halleck *****ed about the cost of his telegrams! After one request for more cavalry, QM General Montgomery Meigs replied suggesting that Rosecrans put infantrymen into wagons to deal with raiding Confederate cavalry. His response was brilliant - "That would do well on Pennsylvania Avenue but not in middle Tennessee." After Rosey took Chattanooga, Meigs came down, saw the terrain first hand and apologized for not understanding what the Army of the Cumberland had been dealing with. Building up the cavalry was not only a protecting the logistics issue but it was also a striking arm issue and Rosecrans wanted his cavalry to be able to go on the offensive in conjunction with his army when the time came. Meanwhile, Stanley was forming a potent cavalry arm with excellent brigade commanders but mediocre division commanders Robert Mitchell and John B. Turchin, both of whom would later be replaced. By March 1863, Stanley told Rosecrans that his troopers wer eready to hit the field and their first misson was to test Bragg's defense line which ran from McMinnville in the east toward Columbia in the west. For several months, Stanley's troopers, sometime with infantry support, attacked points along the line which served to give his men needed field experience but also to gather intel as to where Bragg was the weakest. Turns out that after several victories against Bragg's right held by John Hunt Morgan, gave Rosey the seeds for where his Tullahoma planning was to attack with his main thrust. By contrast the Union attacks on Bragg's left, held by Forrest and Van Dorn (until his death) were repulsed virtually every time.

So now with his cavalry arm in place and his logistics secure and his army reinforced, Rosecrans planned to execute the Tullahoma Campaign The main attack would be by Crittenden's Corps moving east/southeast from Murfreesboro through Gillie's Gap with the goal being Manchester. From Manchester the next goal was Allisonia/Estill Springs which is where Bragg's railroad supply line crossed the Elk River. The goal was to force Bragg to fight for his line of supply on ground of Rosey's choosing and hopefully smash Bragg's army. The other Corps of Thomas and McCook were feints designed to fix Bragg's center in place with Granger backing up the cavalry movement towards Shelbyville. The friction of war set in on the opening day when it began to rain, and as Rhea noted here, a 500 year rain event, or as one of Rosey's men stated, "not just a regular rain but a Baptist downpour!" This slowed Crittenden, who had the toughest terrain to deal with (drive through this area sometime!!!) and he bogged down going only a few miles in several days. As we know Wilder blew through the defenses of Hoover's Gap and gave Rosey a big break and Rosey was swift enough of thought to move Thomas to the main force column and bring McCook over from Liberty Gap to follow behind him. Manchester was still the target but the rains just messed the roads and finally Bragg figured it out and reacted. So Rosey's plan was forced to change from smashing Bragg to getting him out of Middle TN altogether. This is what took place.

After this, Rosecrans had to rebuild track torn up by Bragg's retreat as well as bridges including the big one over the Tennessee River at Bridgeport which would not get rebuilt until the winter of 1863/1864. That all took time to do and about a month after Tullahoma had concluded, Rosecrans moved on Chattanooga and took it without a shot fired. The plan of using three or more maneuver columns worked twice for him as it gave the enemy pause as to where the real main attack was coming from. The issue in north Georgia was even bigger mountains and further apart gaps in them which gave Bragg the idea of defending in place and going after each column if possible. Plus he was massively reinforced. There is nothing that Rosecrans did here that I would not have tried as well. You have to balance risk with gains made by aggressive movement and what can possibly be achieved.

Rhea has waxed well here about the amazing traits of the Army of the Cumberland which, in my opinion as well as that of a couple NPS historians, Rhea and some others, was probably the most advanced of the Union field armies on several levels. Rhea's post about lines of sight communication with signal flags is key here and Rosey used the terrain to its best for this. Some years ago, Rhea too me to a ridge west of Murfreesboro to where one signal station was (and Granger's HQ if I have that correct). From the ridge top looking east you could easily see the cupola of the courthouse in downtown Murfreesboro, also a signal station and about ten miles further east Pilot Knob also a signal station and Rosey's final one of the line in that direction. To the west was Roper's Knob by Franklin and the signal line went even further west. So getting a message from the furthest west signal station to Pilot Knob would take only minutes. Rhea gave a signals demo to an Army staff ride I conducted some years ago and to this day some of the attendees who I am friends with remain amazed, one officer, now a major, actually writing a post-ride report about how the Army should go back to signal flags as a back up for comms today. Rhea has forgotten more about Rosey's Signal Corps than any of us has ever known to begin with and he remains by go-to guy for this for any tours/staff rides I do for the campaign.

Until you get eyes onto this terrain, drive around and through it and see the signal line hilltops, the road gaps and surrounding terrain you simply cannot understand the Tullahoma and Chattanooga Campaigns at all. Nor can you fully comprehend what Rosecrans was dealing with at the time. Again, Meigs apologized to him once he got down there and saw it for himself! Additionally, the land itself in the area in and around the Highland Rim is of a clay like consistency which, in heavy rains, turns to goo. Also, the limestone underpinnings of the top soil is very shallow and when it rains a good bit there even today the water backs up and causes flooding. Some years ago, after a couple days of rain, I took the Columbus, OH CWRT on a Tullahoma tour and one road that I wanted to use heading south from Christiana to the Railroad Gap was flooded so we had to drop that part. There was standing water everywhere that day! I have done another tour right after significant rain and the same thing happened which gave us all a good bit of detail as to what Rosey was dealing with when the campaign began.

Two last things. First, Rosey's Tullahoma Campaign began before the battle of Gettysburg by a week and ended on July 4th. This coincided with the surrender of Vicksburg and the end of Gettysburg (but not the long retreat). So Tullahoma was well within these other events. Secondly, one poster here noted that had Rosecrans moved sooner then Bragg could not have detached reinforcements to other places. Right before Stones River, the CS War Department ordered Stevenson's Division, Bragg's largest by far, to Vicksburg. Right before Tullahoma they ordered another sent to Mississippi and Grierson's Raid forced the break up of the CS Cavalry Corps with another division being sent to Mississippi. We will never know if the CS War Department would have left these units with Bragg had he moved sooner. But with the issues Rosecrans was dealing with that I have outlined above, I am not sure he could have moved sooner. The one battle that I think was most affected by the loss of troops was Stones River; Bragg really could have used that large division there.

Secondly, Brian Wills is a friend of mine and he heard my program on the Tullahoma Campaign given to the Cobb County CWRT in Georgia before Covid. I asked him his thoughts about Rosecrans and the Army of the Cumberland that he built with regards to George Thomas (whom Wills has written a bio) what Thomas would have thought about Rosecrans. He stated categorically that the AOC of Thomas was great because of Rosecrans and Thomas fully knew that and appreciated that.

Rhea has mentioned how the rank and file of the AOC felt about Rosecrans. Here is another source -
Major James Connolly, 123rd Ill. Mtd. Infantry (Wilder), "we don't look for defeat, we don't count on a retreat; with Rosecrans to lead we think we can go anywhere in the Confederacy."
All excellent and valid points. Politics caused the fall of Rosecrans. No less an authority than Garfield believed that.
A problem for Rosecrans today is that for many Grant has become the indispensable man. To really study and judge Rosecrans is to necessarily criticize Grant. That's not cool today.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top