I wish I had a know that my cousin was NFB back when I was in the C of C .I have been a member of the NB Forrest Camp 215 in Memphis since I was 16 when my Grandfather who was also a member signed me up.
Sorry, I thought you were talking about Loring.
Born & raised here, unfortunately, by my Kentuckian parents. Don't mistake me for a Yankee, though; I'm a proud Southerner born in economic exileJohnny Reb how did you wind up in Michigan? Must feel like a sore tail cat in a room full of rocking chairs!
Born & raised here, unfortunately, by my Kentuckian parents. Don't mistake me for a Yankee, though; I'm a proud Southerner born in economic exile![]()
That's what i see, whether in the news or even in this thread, see people who admit never being in SCV making allegations that as a former member wasn't my experience at all. So don't see how the SCV can refute imaginary allegations, nor see why they should waste time on them.I am saying the uneducated majority is the hate group .
They took down Andrew Jackson's statue in New Orleans and wasn't even a confederate.That's what i see, whether in the news or even in this thread, see people who admit never being in SCV making allegations that as a former member wasn't my experience at all. So don't see how the SCV can refute imaginary allegations, nor see why they should waste time on them.
The uneducated majority doesn't know what or who was dug up and they don't even care. But you can be sure they weren't vandalized any Yankees graves/. Monuments.iThev Yankees that burnt Atlanta and the rest of the state and began to burn South Carolina. I read that the Yankees having crossed the Savannah River made their way North and came across a beautiful church. The pastor had recently passed . The Yankees wanted the preacher to watch them burn his church to the ground. When they found out he was dead they dug him up and propped the casket open so he could see his own church burn down!! Weren't they specialYou see what I mean Uneducated Majority!!
I read that the Yankees having crossed the Savannah River made their way North and came across a beautiful church. The pastor had recently passed . The Yankees wanted the preacher to watch them burn his church to the ground. When they found out he was dead they dug him up and propped the casket open so he could see his own church burn down!! Weren't they special
As a matter of fact NBF wanted to be buried with his brothers in Memphis.
He was buried in Elmwood cemetery in Memphis Next to his other brothers. And his wife joined him later. After being buried , there was a great movement to put an Equestrian statue with NBF on and move them to a prominent park named Forrest Park. When it was suggested to put him back by his brothers it was decided that was not happening.Then why wasn't he? Why didn't the SCV honor his wishes?
Presumably his brothers were buried in a proper cemetery instead of a park.
We have a gen John B Gordon on an equestrian statue in front of the capital of Georgia. Don't know if he is under it or not. He was one of Lees most trusted generals.A fellow Walton County Governor He was in charge of rebuilding the capital after the town was torched. His name Was Henry McDaniel. Wounded at gettysburg. He came back after the war and built our capital with the gold dome, made from gold from our own mines in Dahlonega Ga.He was buried in Elmwood cemetery in Memphis Next to his other brothers. And his wife joined him later. After being buried , there was a great movement to put an Equestrian statue with NBF on and move them to a prominent park named Forrest Park. When it was suggested to put him back by his brothers it was decided that was not happening.
It was the Forrest family who made that decision, not the SCV.Then why wasn't he? Why didn't the SCV honor his wishes?
Well unfortunately when it comes to the modern SCV, anything they say is as unreliable and fanciful as what they call "history" articles in the magazine. Utterly worthless and easily disproven or contradictory.I don't know what resources you've consulted, but I have been able to document a consistent, continuous operation of the SCV as an organization using digitized records that are accessible online (including but not limited to online newspaper archives).
The SCV now has a book available for purchase that gives brief bios on every Commander-in-Chief since the beginning until now (which my own research that I did before the book was published has verified as accurate).
... as for the SCV logo, it doesn't go back to 1896 but it does go back at least to the 1920s; a picture of it is in the yearbook & minutes of the 31st SCV Reunion from 1926.
I study the battles and the Confederate soldiers to honor the sacrifices of the Southern soldiers and their families—including my families— without approving the institution of slavery.I would never join a group that reveres secession and the Confederacy (even if they do now also pledge allegiance to the US flag). I can see honoring one's ancestors but not the Confederacy.
I respect my ancestors, too (and some were slave owners). I just don't respect - and certainly don't revere - the Confederacy or what it stood for.I study the battles and the Confederate soldiers to honor the sacrifices of the Southern soldiers and their families—including my families— without approving the institution of slavery.
Just as in my genealogy research, I study wills, censuses and court files that document my ancestors owned slaves but without condemning them as criminals. I know some will never understand that I can respect my ancestors along with our American leads such as George Washington, etc.
If I used your own standard of research and applied it to what you have said regarding SCV history, I might come to the conclusion that anything you say historically can't be trusted...Well unfortunately when it comes to the modern SCV, anything they say is as unreliable and fanciful as what they call "history" articles in the magazine. Utterly worthless and easily disproven or contradictory.
I think that needs to be touched on, the magazine. You read historical articles in there, and anything in issues from the late-80's to mid or late 90's and they are top shelf with reliable sources. They are excellent articles, usually by qualified researchers.
Then you get to the 2000's, about the time the power struggle with that Sweeney feller and his cohorts seizing power of the SCV, (last I checked the CiC-ship still tends to rotate between his buddies and folks they approve of the "Louisiana cabal" I mentioned in a previous post), but after they took over, just about every article in that magazine is utterly worthless and fantasy.
There's always exceptions, but when I was still a member one issue a year, with only one article, would be good and the rest trash.
I remember one issue they had a picture of a Yank private saying it was a picture of a Confederate!
You can't trust anything they say historically to me.