Mixed blood is actually mixed blood, and certainly not representing of only one racial depiction......I assume of pure bloods? Which then begs of which race being pure.........Some people are fine with white people wearing blackface. Others not so much.
Ok....whats your point of posting this?![]()
Looking for people that do native portrayals | Reenactors Forum - Join, Drill, See the Elephant
Hello, I am interested in furthering a portrayal of a native (aka Indian) involved with the conflict. Thought it might be cool to portray someone who was a member if a homeguard unit out west. I have some information to draw from. My problem is no one here in Massachusetts does such a portrayal...civilwartalk.com
I posted it in April 2019. I suppose I was under the impression the thread had to do with Native Americans & the Civil War. Is there a problem?Ok....whats your point of posting this?
Begs the question however, how do you want your impression to be? Nothing against it mind you but you're narrowing your impression. Seeing as there probably are not as many Native American civil war reenactors you might be holding yourself back.
Written by AW Sparks....
In Chapter 5..we learn about Cooper' Indians..... "The Indian warriors, as I noticed were
well supplied with rations, and rode small ponies and were dressed in a garb ranging from a common gent's suit to a breech clout and blanket, most of the full bloods wore only the latter"
"their faces were painted in such a manner that many of them were frightful to even look upon, there seemed to be no particular design in the manner of their painting, but each one seemed to have been painted according to
according to the fancy of the artist"
"and some were painted black down to the eyes, then the balance of the
face red, and many hideous looking faces told of desperate purposes,
but if any of them bespoke any rank or had special meaning I failed to
learn them. Some had head coverings that were the skins from the
heads of buffalo, bear, panthers, cougars, calves, etc., and quite a
number wore the horns taken off with the hide of buffalo, and others
wore no head covering, only a single feather like it might be plucked
from the tail of a turkey, eagle, buzzard, or anything else that the
wearer might fancy. I noticed one old warrior on foot who carried a
long full stock rifle, he wore leggings and mockasins in addition to
his breech clout and a feather about four feet long that had been
taken from the tail of a peafowl was his complete wardrobe. He only
spoke one word in English and that was, No! We called him "Old Pap"
and he answered to the name with his positive No! to anything that was
spoken to him. There were quite a number of squaws that were among
the warriors in camps but how they traveled and when, I never learned
the Indians. No matter how full or scant his apparel was sure to have
the badge of red and blue on his arm. Their arms were as varied as
their apparel and were old rifle, guns and bows and arrows mostly, and
in this motleyed assembly we marched upon the enemy, a force I
suppose, all toll, would number from 2500 to 2800 men."
But all this is racist and made up right???? Guess the guy just felt like lying for some reason?
Quite a few wearing civilian garb.Some images of Choctaw, Caddo, Seminole, and Cherokee:
View attachment 482189View attachment 482190View attachment 482191
Unknown Choctaw. Unknown Choctaw. Unknown Choctaw.
View attachment 482192
Unknown.
View attachment 482193
Caddo.
View attachment 482194
Chickasaw.
View attachment 482195
Cherokees in D.C. in 1866.
The term is Wannabe or Iwishiwas.Mixed blood is actually mixed blood, and certainly not representing of only one racial depiction......I assume of pure bloods? Which then begs of which race being pure.........
The tribe portrayed in the post-war docudrama "F TROOP" was originally named the Fugawi.The term is Wannabe or Iwishiwas.
Guess wanting non historical representation of just pureblood would be a wannabe or Iwishitwas representation, as it wouldn't be actually accurate, as natives and whites had intermingled for centuries by ACW.The term is Wannabe or Iwishiwas.
One of my favorites!The tribe portrayed in the post-war docudrama "F TROOP" was originally named the Fugawi.
View attachment 515372
Nah, I'm just tired of White people wanting to be something they aren't. Some people are fine with people pretending to be something they're not. Simply stolen valor with a different target. That you might encourage such is expected.Guess wanting non historical representation of just pureblood would be a wannabe or Iwishitwas representation, as it wouldn't be actually accurate, as natives and whites had intermingled for centuries by ACW.
I have seen the term pretendian.Nah, I'm just tired of White people wanting to be something they aren't. Some people are fine with people pretending to be something they're not. Simply stolen valor with a different target. That you might encourage such is expected.
The term Natives use is Iwishiwas and Wannabe… oddly they seem less appreciative of such than you do. Likely because they are the ones feeling insulted.