Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am thinking that the biggest challenge would be determining how much native cultural items the men would have carried. These items were often customized per tribe via markings or bead work patterns.Hello,
For a while now I have been interested in doing a native portryal a member of a homeguard unit or maybe representing one of Stand Watie's men.
Down in Florida Seminole War reenactments are pretty popular and there's some groups doing that.
I have heard the same thing concerning eastern woodland tribesI am thinking that the biggest challenge would be determining how much native cultural items the men would have carried. These items were often customized per tribe via markings or bead work patterns.
On account that I read years ago stated that the various native factions identified each other tribally by sight. But... the source did not say how this was done.
That makes sense as most of the Oklahoma tribal factions in the civil war were originally eastern woodland Indians who had been deported during the 'Trail of Tears'.I have heard the same thing concerning eastern woodland tribes
A certain number attributed these deportations with the federal government and by extension, the Union.
Would be surprised if very many actually object to white native american portrayals. Think most realize the shortages of reenactors.I think they're finally getting actual Seminoles to portray the Seminoles too. Which is good - not only for better authenticity, but also because white guys portraying Native Americans doesn't fly very well anymore, no matter how sincere and sympathetic the portrayal.
I haven't done any of those events myself so I can't say first hand but I know a lot of guys that have and from what I gather they are very supportive of those events.Would be surprised if very many actually object to white native american portrayals. Think most realize the shortages of reenactors.
Would seem far preferable to ignoring their presence or participation.
A good tracker could identify a Lakota, Cheyenne or Crow by the moccasin they wore… and visually by the clothing and war paint. I've never understood it but I wasn't born and bred in that environment. Neither were many Indians today yet the hate between the Lakota & the Crow is still there and it is very real. That is but one example.I watched a YouTube video of a reenactor portraying a Wyandot (Huron) from the 1750s at an event at Fort Niagara . He had Wyandot ancestry through his grandmother and explained in detail the things he wore and carried. He said the quill pattern on his knife sheath would identify him as Wyandot to other woodland tribes. .
In the comments he got skewered for wearing the wrong sash , the wrong hair roach , the tinkling cones , etc . Most of these comments seemed to come from others with Native American heritage yet I wonder how they would know exactly what their ancestors wore in the 1750s. Would similar criticism happen to some one portraying NA Civil War reenactors ? I would think so.
In any case the subject of tribal recognition is interesting to me. Would beadwork worn identify a person as being from a certain tribe in the trans- Mississippi ?
I am aware of the Crow-Lakota issue. I am not aware of any issues amongst eastern tribal members despite centuries of intertribal warfare. Maybe it's because this happened a longer time ago .A good tracker could identify a Lakota, Cheyenne or Crow by the moccasin they wore… and visually by the clothing and war paint. I've never understood it but I wasn't born and bred in that environment. Neither were many Indians today yet the hate between the Lakota & the Crow is still there and it is very real. That is but one example.
To be fair, by the time of the CW mixed blood tribal members were a thing. One example comes to my mind is the author of a "Creek Warrior for the Confederacy" is a mention that he, (or a relative?) having red hair due to Scottish blood or something or other.All I can say is don't. There is little more insulting than a bad impression of your ancestors. Natives have been getting insulted for generations by white people there's no need to add to it.
Even if acting with genuine intent to get things right it's very easy to make a simple mistake and journey into insulting.
Honestly, I was insulted once by seeing a white guy pretending to be Indian and doing a REALLY bad job at it. Hollywood is not history and there were no Comanche with the CS.
Most Lakota I know believe there are enough of the Iwishiwas and Wannabe tribe already. No need for more. FWIW I got/ get along with the Lakota as well as I do because I know I'm not indian and don't t pretend to be. White man pretending to be Indian is no less insulting than a white guy putting on black face.
I never understood the degree of animosity between the Lakota and Crow. But boy howdy was it real, at least in the early 90's. Want to see blood fly just call a Lakota a "dirty Crow." And that was among HS kids.I am aware of the Crow-Lakota issue. I am not aware of any issues amongst eastern tribal members despite centuries of intertribal warfare. Maybe it's because this happened a longer time ago .