Member Review McClellan's War, by Ethan S. Rafuse

Maybe heart of the reason the Republicans formed in the first place was the Whigs and Democrats weren't sufficiently different.
The Whig Party really fell apart because it could not reconcile its northern and southern wings, with their respective views on slavery and its expansion. The Democratic party was also divided between north and south on the question of slavery, which led to a partial breakup in 1860. In the presidential election of that year, competing candidates, Douglas representing the north and Breckenridge the south, both stood for election.
 
The Whig Party really fell apart because it could not reconcile its northern and southern wings, with their respective views on slavery and its expansion. The Democratic party was also divided between north and south on the question of slavery, which led to a partial breakup in 1860. In the presidential election of that year, competing candidates, Douglas representing the north and Breckenridge the south, both stood for election.

Your post is all technically correct.

What I am suggesting is that maybe there's more to it.
 
Your post is all technically correct.

What I am suggesting is that maybe there's more to it.
Insights into McClellan's personality and his command decisions are surely not reliant on a simple explanation such as his Whiggish upbringing. That was one factor among many, and maybe not even the most important. Rafuse does a good job at delving into McClellan's family background and politics; but as you previously noted, McClellan's overriding concern was in maintaining the Union and the Constitution as it was, and not in conducting a harsh war against civilian resources and property (i.e., slaves). That guiding principle was probably more common than not among Northerners in the early years of the war, so in that regard McClellan was not necessarily out of the mainstream thinking.
 
The fact that he didn't have the experience for the responsibility thrown at him was never addressed in this book, I don't recall, but Grant did say that part of Mac's challenge was that he was too young for the responsibility and unlike all of the other great Union generals at the end of the war, he did not fight his way along and up.
Grant and Sheridan were comparable in experience. I don't think Sherman had the same level of experience, but Sherman's obsession with the details of movement was enough to compensate for any lack of experience. One of Confederate General Joe Johnstons problems was that he understood what it took to maintain an army, and many other Confederates were unwilling to address those matters rationally.
 
If an officer went to California and performed competently, it was evidence of their understanding of the basics. McClellan hated his survey assignment in what became Washington and may have skipped some of the work.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top