- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Location
- Denver, CO
Good post. I don't think Rosecrans ever contributed at the strategic level. But his operational plans in western Virginia and in Tennessee were well thought out. He was probably one of the best intelligence officers in the US army, until he underestimated the problems in northern Georgia.Some perspective on Rosecrans is in order. There was no operation in the Civil War that rises to the complexity, execution & strategic success of the Tullahoma / Chattanooga Campaign. All of Middle Tennessee & the gate to the Deep South, Chattanooga came under Union control without a large loss of life. The Army of the Cumberland was supported by a logistical complex stretching up river to Cincinnati OH. The Department of the Cumberland, that Rosecrans also commanded, had (+/-) 240,000 men. The massive logistical operation that Rosecrans created made everything that followed possible. That in & of itself was a stroke of strategic genius.
Contemporaneously, Lee had no logistical support a mere 41 miles north of the of the Potomac.
Once established in Chattanooga, Rosecrans faced a daunting tactical & strategic challenge. If you have never been there, wadding up a piece of stiff paper & loosely flattening out will give you an idea of what the area looks like. Complicating things, there were no accurate maps.
The A of the C's topographers were arguably the best at that time. Using a solar powered copy machine (+/-) 20,000 multicolored fully updated maps had been copied & distributed during the Tullahoma / Chattanooga Campaign. The area between Chattanooga & Atlanta was not properly mapped. Sherman said that without accurate maps, he would not have attempted the Atlanta Campaign. Unlike him, Rosecrans could not wait for, "…Sgt. Finegan & his motley crew to finish their work."
The challenge Rosecrans faced can be imagined via the currier line between Thomas' HQ & Rosecrans in Chattanooga. By mounted courier, it took 14 hours each way to transmit a message & receive an answer. The "should-done-this or Should-a-done that" experts never take that into account. One unfortunate courier stumbled upon an HQ after 36 hours in the wilderness & handed his dispatch bag regardless of which HQ it was. Logically, the only thing an army commander wanted to do was to get south of there where topological sanity returned. Logical engineer that he was, it probably did not cross Rosecrans' well ordered mind that Bragg would come north & fight a battle there. What Rosecrans' strategic vision for an Atlanta campaign are unknowable.
To my mind there was no best strategist. Grant fought a river war in the Mississippi valley. Rosecrans fought a rail road war. There was a littoral war. The march back & forth a dozen times war in Virginia was a singular strategic challenge. The only General who commanded armies & created a strategy across all of the distinct operating areas was Grant. He adopted Lincoln's insightful phrase, " If you can't skin, you can hold a leg." to describe his strategy for ending the war. Every Union army was ordered to maintain maximum pressure so as to leave no space for CSA forces to maneuver & support each other. As each was defeated, It freed forces up to contribute to the next operation. E.g., an entire corps was escorted to New Orleans from Muscle Shoals by 40 tin clads after Hood's defeat.
Nobody exercised a command like Grant did.
Note: Wittenberg's Tullahoma Campaign book is one everyone should have on their book shelf.
As I posted before, he needed to be more politically savy in standing up to Sec'y of War Stanton. Lincoln liked Rosecrans that General Rosecrans had made it to Chattanooga with his force intact. I have to agree with Grant's thinking. Once Rosecrans had occupied Chattanooga he should fortified it further and insisted on restoring the bridge over the Tennessee.