Agreed. But don't diss him as a "Southerner," b/c he was from one of the infamous "border" states, and TN was the LAST state to formally secede and become an official member of the CSA, so, even tho he was south of the Mason-Dixon line, he was likely pretty mild, and dare I say, even-handed, by definition, having been raised in a border state in the 1st ½ of the 20th ce.?! More important, perhaps, is that he was ½ or ¼ Jewish and was raised Jewish attending synagogue weekly until he was age 11, and, .as a result of the discrimination he experienced later in life, he became a strong civil rights supporter before WW2! So, anyway, hence, he perhaps should be considered as not just another Southern apologist, but as someone uniquely qualified to right a "balanced" history of the war, something Bruce Catton & most modern historians rarely produce, imho. : )