A little help needed

Chres

Cadet
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Hello all,

So I stumbled upon this weapon and being no expert of Civil War weapons systems am a bit stumped as to what it is exactly. To the best of my knowledge it is a Confederate Mendenhall, Jones & Gardner. I would guess that it was manufactured at the Deep River Armory at Jamestown in Guilford Country N.C. I would not presume to know any more. I thought it was a .58, however the overall length of weapon is 55 inches where the overall length of the .58 they manufactured was 48 3/8 inches. Is there someone who can give me a bit more info?


Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • 15320491_10154931926363029_1526844991_n.jpg
    15320491_10154931926363029_1526844991_n.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 229
  • 15327774_10154931926343029_1435501976_n.jpg
    15327774_10154931926343029_1435501976_n.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 243
  • 15328211_10154931926338029_384655307_n.jpg
    15328211_10154931926338029_384655307_n.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 213
  • 15328412_10154931926458029_1013475327_n.jpg
    15328412_10154931926458029_1013475327_n.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 238
According to Confederate Rifles and Muskets the lock markings on your rifle are in agreement with early production Mendenhall, Jones and Gardner Type II rifles. As you stated, the barrel should be 33 inches long with a .577 caliber bore. However, it appears that you rifle has had the original military barrel replaced with a civilian barrel. The lock has been milled to allow for the use of a "drum" style percussion bolster that is typical of many civilian arms. The hammer is likewise a replacement.
Unfortunately Murphy and Madaus do not have an example of a Guilford marked Type II lock, but other features on your gun are correct for a MJG rifle. I cannot tell from the pictures, but I am assuming that the butt plate is iron.
It's a real shame that the barrel is not original to the gun, but you still have a very cool and seldom encountered CS rifle there. Thanks for sharing with us.

Cheers,
Garrett
 
According to Confederate Rifles and Muskets the lock markings on your rifle are in agreement with early production Mendenhall, Jones and Gardner Type II rifles. As you stated, the barrel should be 33 inches long with a .577 caliber bore. However, it appears that you rifle has had the original military barrel replaced with a civilian barrel. The lock has been milled to allow for the use of a "drum" style percussion bolster that is typical of many civilian arms. The hammer is likewise a replacement.
Unfortunately Murphy and Madaus do not have an example of a Guilford marked Type II lock, but other features on your gun are correct for a MJG rifle. I cannot tell from the pictures, but I am assuming that the butt plate is iron.
It's a real shame that the barrel is not original to the gun, but you still have a very cool and seldom encountered CS rifle there. Thanks for sharing with us.

Cheers,
Garrett


Thank you so much! I am very impressed with your knowledge.
 
A very interesting rifle; welcome to the forums!
 
Hi Chres, the makers of your rifle began operations in 1862 and obtained a contract from the state of North Carolina for 10,000 pieces. It originally was a full stock with two flat brass bands and brass trigger guard. There will be serial numbers appearing on screw heads as well. You've got a great piece. Regards, Dale007
 
Hello all,

So I stumbled upon this weapon and being no expert of Civil War weapons systems am a bit stumped as to what it is exactly. To the best of my knowledge it is a Confederate Mendenhall, Jones & Gardner. I would guess that it was manufactured at the Deep River Armory at Jamestown in Guilford Country N.C. I would not presume to know any more. I thought it was a .58, however the overall length of weapon is 55 inches where the overall length of the .58 they manufactured was 48 3/8 inches. Is there someone who can give me a bit more info?


Thank you!
 
This one's tuff. There are many confederate rifles that fit the general configurations of the one in the images you have posted. The rifle in your post would have originally looked like a M1841, aka Mississippi rifle. It was one of the most copied styles of the Confederacy. In making copies of the M1841, confederate contractors generally omitted the patch box as your image shows. Likewise, the lock plate, side plate and trigger guard are like the 41, which shows in your images. What's missing are the rest of the fore stock and the 2 barrel bands that would have held the barrel and also the band springs. M.J.&G. made lock plates that were used by a number of these contractors. What makes this tuff to pin point is the barrel. It should have a bolster on it, not a drum as in your image. That tells us the barrel is not the original barrel to the gun.
Also, the lock plate has been re-cut to accept the drum. Originally, the top of the lock plate would have been flat and the bottom of the bolster would have rested on this surface. The next thing of note is the hammer. It's not the correct style for these military locks. Also, look at the difference in patina between the lock plate and the hammer. They're two different colors. This gun may have been a N.C. contractor M1841 style rifle but re-built post war for hunting. Now, here's one other possibility. The Florence armory near James Town in Gilford County made M.1841 rifles, but is reported to have made an unknown number using miscellaneous and re-claimed parts. If so, this would explain the use of a barrel fit with a drum, then having to cut out the lock plate to make the whole thing fit together, which would have been total acceptable in those times. Hope this helps the discussion...
 
Welcome from Pittsburgh...can't add to the conversation other than to tell you that you have a great looking rifle, and I'm a little jealous.
 
While the barrel and hammer are not original to a Type II rifle, you have a very rare lockplate and stock there. MJ&G only made 360 rifles in 1862. In fact, if I'm reading the picture right, the serial number is "342" and this rifle was delivered to the state of NC on 18 December 1862. If you look at my avatar, that's a reproduction MJ&G Type II I built.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top