HF Westerns

Historical-Fiction
I recently finished Quigley Down Under, and found out it is set in the 1860s! Even though he's using a Sharps 1874, the rest of the weapons are Colt Dragoons, 1860 Army revolver, 1858 Remington, etc., all period appropriate. Contrary to the excerpt below, I'd say the Sharps is the only anachronism.

View attachment 544903


In the story of the film, it struck me as an "experimental rifle" with "experimental ammunition"... converted from the "legendary" Sharps rifles of whatever time the movie is set in.
Viz. a "Quigley" Sharps...

1743632442343.png



Marston: "The legendary Sharp."

Quigley: "You know your weapons.
It's a lever-action breech loader. Usual barrel length's 30 inches. This one has an extra four.
It's converted to use a special .45-caliber, 110-grain metal cartridge with a 540-grain paper-patched bullet. It's fitted with double set triggers and a vernier sight.
It's marked up to 1200 yards. This one shoots a mite further."

Marston: "An experimental weapon...with experimental ammunition."

Quigley: "You could call it that."

Marston: "Let's experiment."
 
I was yesterday in Italy, I usually go there for some cigarettes and local beers (believe it or not, Italy has many interesting brands), I found this while shopping, tested already...it's tasty and farty (?)...

 
Audie Murphy playing Jesse James. I never knew that.
It's a very short appearence in the film. I'm still curious.
Guess it's an unofficial sequel to Kansas Raiders! It was directed by Budd Boetticher so it can't be all bad.

I first heard about it from the book Last of the Cowboy Heroes (it's about the Scott, McCrea, and Murphy movies.) I read it last September.
 
Well.....:unsure:

"Time for Dying" is Writer/Director Budd Boetticher's last film, and it's Audie Murphy's last film too. That's its claim to fame. Murphy produced the picture which was filmed in the summer of 1969. He was hoping to revive his business interests, and to make some more B-westerns. This production led to some litigation over financing, rights, etc. and was not released by the time of Murphy's death in 1971. Director Boetticher (d. 2001) opined in an interview he did the movie because he was friends with Murphy, that it was basically a "write off," and he considered the whole effort "tragic."

From October 20, 1973:

1744059788634.png
 
Last edited:
Ever wonder how the great directors like John Ford learned the trade of cinematography
telling the story visually was what made Ford great, he had no choice before the talkie


In an interview, fellow director Bud Boetticher recalled visiting Ford shortly before his passing. "listen, kid; if you ever want to be known as the best director in the world, always remember that everybody else is a son-of-a-___h."
 
Ever wonder how the great directors like John Ford learned the trade of cinematography
telling the story visually was what made Ford great, he had no choice before the talkie

All great directors are visual. Here's a great video essay on how Akira Kurosawa (who loved Westerns!) communicated through movement rather than talky dialogue.

 
Watched (again) yesterday "Many rivers to cross" (1955), starring Robert Taylor ; I guess people in the 50's may have love that film, it's fresh and "innocent", funny but neither clumsy (?), there's also a good cast, and decent sets (painted mostly, but it's fine).
I specially like the welcoming pannel , which says approximatly : without these women, few of us would be there today to see that film.

 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top