- Joined
- Feb 20, 2005
- Location
- Nashville
Forrest and Wilson at Sugar Creek
I'm trying to prepare a presentation on the battle at Sugar Creek, Tennessee Dec 26, 1864 for next week's SCV meeting at our camp. Interesting, to me at least, to look at the contrast in opinions between two opposing generals at the same event:
Forrest: "I halted my command at Sugar Creek, where it encamped during the night. On the morning of the 26th the enemy commenced advancing, driving back General Ross' pickets. Owing to the dense fog he could not see the temporary fortifications which the infantry had thrown up and behind which they were secreted. The enemy therefore advanced to within fifty paces of these works, when a volley was opened upon him, causing the wildest confusion. Two mounted regiments of Ross' brigade and Ector's and Granbury's brigades of infantry were ordered to charge upon the discomfited foe, which was done, producing a complete rout. The enemy was pursued for two miles, but showing no disposition to give battle my troops were ordered back. In this engagement he sustained a loss of about 150 in killed and wounded; many prisoners and horses were captured and about 400 horses killed. I held this position for two hours, but the enemy showing no disposition to renew the attack, and fearing he might attempt a flank movement in the dense fog, I resumed the march, after leaving a picket with orders to remain until 4 o'clock. The enemy made no further attack between Sugar Creek and Tennessee River, which stream I crossed on the evening of the 27th of December."
Wilson:"Darkness again put an end to the pursuit, but it was continued the next day to Sugar Creek, a clear beautiful stream of limpid water running through an unbroken forest to the river. All efforts to bring the enemy again to anything more than a skirmish were futile. The road was lined with abandoned wagons and broken down mules, giving conclusive evidence that the fighting of that campaign was at an end. Beyond the creek Forrest formed line and made a brief show of resistance, but a flank movement by Hammond's brigade easily turned him out of his position and sent him again to the rear under the cover of darkness. The country in which we found ourselves was the worst we had yet seen. It was entirely stripped of forage and supplies. Our own trains were far in the rear, or haversacks and forage packs were empty. There was absolutely nothing at hand except the beautiful clear spring water of Sugar Creek, but neither men nor horses could live on water alone."
I'm trying to prepare a presentation on the battle at Sugar Creek, Tennessee Dec 26, 1864 for next week's SCV meeting at our camp. Interesting, to me at least, to look at the contrast in opinions between two opposing generals at the same event:
Forrest: "I halted my command at Sugar Creek, where it encamped during the night. On the morning of the 26th the enemy commenced advancing, driving back General Ross' pickets. Owing to the dense fog he could not see the temporary fortifications which the infantry had thrown up and behind which they were secreted. The enemy therefore advanced to within fifty paces of these works, when a volley was opened upon him, causing the wildest confusion. Two mounted regiments of Ross' brigade and Ector's and Granbury's brigades of infantry were ordered to charge upon the discomfited foe, which was done, producing a complete rout. The enemy was pursued for two miles, but showing no disposition to give battle my troops were ordered back. In this engagement he sustained a loss of about 150 in killed and wounded; many prisoners and horses were captured and about 400 horses killed. I held this position for two hours, but the enemy showing no disposition to renew the attack, and fearing he might attempt a flank movement in the dense fog, I resumed the march, after leaving a picket with orders to remain until 4 o'clock. The enemy made no further attack between Sugar Creek and Tennessee River, which stream I crossed on the evening of the 27th of December."
Wilson:"Darkness again put an end to the pursuit, but it was continued the next day to Sugar Creek, a clear beautiful stream of limpid water running through an unbroken forest to the river. All efforts to bring the enemy again to anything more than a skirmish were futile. The road was lined with abandoned wagons and broken down mules, giving conclusive evidence that the fighting of that campaign was at an end. Beyond the creek Forrest formed line and made a brief show of resistance, but a flank movement by Hammond's brigade easily turned him out of his position and sent him again to the rear under the cover of darkness. The country in which we found ourselves was the worst we had yet seen. It was entirely stripped of forage and supplies. Our own trains were far in the rear, or haversacks and forage packs were empty. There was absolutely nothing at hand except the beautiful clear spring water of Sugar Creek, but neither men nor horses could live on water alone."