Specific interest question.

Yes, battery-against-battery shootouts were quite common although there weren't entire battles just between artillery units (that I know of).
Thanks, the opening stages of Waterloo were kicked off by three shots from a cannon and then all hell broke lose, the French advance on Hougoumont and the Brit cannons let rip, the 'Emperor's Daughters' joined in, in total there was something like 410 cannons all firing at the same time. it must have been a tremendous sight not to mention the sound
 
i have two main interests in the civil war. the first has three features but i'll be brief.
A) artifacts, archeology , and geography.
i love seeing and touching things from history.
i often wonder, when i'm in a historical setting or even a place where no recorded events have occured , what might have happened there. who sat where i sat, and who trod where i walk. who built these things and why ?
the ultimate for me would be to find an artifact, like a watch or knife, that can be identified with a particular person. then study that person and find out all about him or her. when i was young you could still pry musket balls and bullets out of shiloh church walls.
i love thinking about what people had to do while looking at a certain piece of terrain or battlefield or ocean's and rivers.
B) i am mystified at what goes on in people's minds. i am struggling to understand the thoughts and actions of civil war era people and how we continue to justify and emulate them. i do not understand why we must justify actions that we know are wrong and dismiss them with "that was a different time". does time change what is right and what is wrong ? many thinkers of the time were simply wrong. it reminds me of Galileo and Copernicus and their controversies and how common sense and contemporary thinking can be wrong but supported.
 
i have two main interests in the civil war. the first has three features but i'll be brief.
A) artifacts, archeology , and geography.
i love seeing and touching things from history.
i often wonder, when i'm in a historical setting or even a place where no recorded events have occured , what might have happened there. who sat where i sat, and who trod where i walk. who built these things and why ?
the ultimate for me would be to find an artifact, like a watch or knife, that can be identified with a particular person. then study that person and find out all about him or her. when i was young you could still pry musket balls and bullets out of shiloh church walls.
i love thinking about what people had to do while looking at a certain piece of terrain or battlefield or ocean's and rivers.
B) i am mystified at what goes on in people's minds. i am struggling to understand the thoughts and actions of civil war era people and how we continue to justify and emulate them. i do not understand why we must justify actions that we know are wrong and dismiss them with "that was a different time". does time change what is right and what is wrong ? many thinkers of the time were simply wrong. it reminds me of Galileo and Copernicus and their controversies and how common sense and contemporary thinking can be wrong but supported.

You sound like my kindred spirit.
 
I became interested in the CW in junior high in the early 1960's -- great time for a CW beginner.

My focus of Confederate railroads developed from a US Navy career, mostly in logistics, and reading Black's Railroads of the Confederacy. The questions left in my mind were numerous and, after 20 years of research, many are still there -- unanswered.

My research has matured to the point that I will be publishing my first book, probably in January, with 2 more planned. Of course, my web site, www.csa-railroads.com, still gets most of my research time.
 
I became interested in the CW in junior high in the early 1960's -- great time for a CW beginner.

My focus of Confederate railroads developed from a US Navy career, mostly in logistics, and reading Black's Railroads of the Confederacy. The questions left in my mind were numerous and, after 20 years of research, many are still there -- unanswered.

My research has matured to the point that I will be publishing my first book, probably in January, with 2 more planned. Of course, my web site, www.csa-railroads.com, still gets most of my research time.

That's an interesting site, I had a quick look but I have added it to my favourites so I can revisit it later. I wish you all the very best with your new book.:thumbsup:
 
My interest in the CW began in high school history class. After I entered the work force and started getting paid vacations, I spent every vacation going to CW battlefields across the country. That eventually led to re-enacting, and THAT led to artifact collecting. After years of study and sightseeing I came to focus primarily on the Western Theatre of operations, probably because I'm from the West. 10 years ago or so I began to become obsessed with the Naval aspect of the War, specifically the Western Theatre again, the "Brown Water Navy". Stones River and Franklin are to me the most fascinating Western Battles to study. When it comes to the East, Antietam is my favorite, due to the preservation of the sight. We all love Gettysburg, and I am most fascinated by day #1, First Contact, as I am a huge Buford fan.
 
I came to focus primarily on the Western Theatre of operations, probably because I'm from the West.
mine were shiloh and lookout mountain (which usually meant the trip would take my family on into the smokies ((black bears at road side trash cans and natural water-slides were the real treat !)) .)
i was always conflicted though. things like ruggle's battery seemed to me irresistible and yet the south lost the battle. my dad was pretty good describing events and pointed to wallace as the hero of the hornet's nest and sunken road. but all i saw was this line of cannons. who could stand up to that !
same thing at lookout mt. as a kid looking down from the top, i could not understand how you could lose that position. missionary ridge did not concern me and seemed to me then as a consequent of look out mt. but i could not fathom my beloved rebels losing that place, where one man could hold up ten or twenty, especially since they were rebs.
so for battles those are my interests , even if only for sentimental and reminiscent reasons.
BTW i just learned that shiloh church was torn down or collapsed (there are different stories) shortly after the battle and was reconstructed. i don't know where i got the idea that there were musket balls in the walls unless it was part of the reconstruction. i haven't been there since i was nine. it might also have come from my older brother. he was a boy scout but not always truthful and liked a joke. i think it was from him that i got the idea to pry them out with a knife. the last time i remember being there was to pick him up from a boy scout gathering or jamboree. i remember they had recently paved a lot of the walk ways and my brother had to hike them. he took clamp on roller skates to do the hike. now i wonder if that happened ? :confused:
my point is that my memory stinks and i remember things that never happened or happened much differently. please excuse me , it is not intentional, it is just my bad memory. :frown:
 
:thumbsup:
mine were shiloh and lookout mountain (which usually meant the trip would take my family on into the smokies ((black bears at road side trash cans and natural water-slides were the real treat !)) .)
i was always conflicted though. things like ruggle's battery seemed to me irresistible and yet the south lost the battle. my dad was pretty good describing events and pointed to wallace as the hero of the hornet's nest and sunken road. but all i saw was this line of cannons. who could stand up to that !
same thing at lookout mt. as a kid looking down from the top, i could not understand how you could lose that position. missionary ridge did not concern me and seemed to me then as a consequent of look out mt. but i could not fathom my beloved rebels losing that place, where one man could hold up ten or twenty, especially since they were rebs.
so for battles those are my interests , even if only for sentimental and reminiscent reasons.
BTW i just learned that shiloh church was torn down or collapsed (there are different stories) shortly after the battle and was reconstructed. i don't know where i got the idea that there were musket balls in the walls unless it was part of the reconstruction. i haven't been there since i was nine. it might also have come from my older brother. he was a boy scout but not always truthful and liked a joke. i think it was from him that i got the idea to pry them out with a knife. the last time i remember being there was to pick him up from a boy scout gathering or jamboree. i remember they had recently paved a lot of the walk ways and my brother had to hike them. he took clamp on roller skates to do the hike. now i wonder if that happened ? :confused:
my point is that my memory stinks and i remember things that never happened or happened much differently. please excuse me , it is not intentional, it is just my bad memory. :frown:

No problem, I enjoyed your story, it doesn't matter very much if those musket balls were genuine or not, the main thing is, it fired up a passion for the CW.
Still a kindred spirit.:thumbsup:
 
i have two main interests in the civil war. the first has three features but i'll be brief.
A) artifacts, archeology , and geography.
i love seeing and touching things from history.
i often wonder, when i'm in a historical setting or even a place where no recorded events have occured , what might have happened there. who sat where i sat, and who trod where i walk. who built these things and why ?
the ultimate for me would be to find an artifact, like a watch or knife, that can be identified with a particular person. then study that person and find out all about him or her. when i was young you could still pry musket balls and bullets out of shiloh church walls.
i love thinking about what people had to do while looking at a certain piece of terrain or battlefield or ocean's and rivers.
B) i am mystified at what goes on in people's minds. i am struggling to understand the thoughts and actions of civil war era people and how we continue to justify and emulate them. i do not understand why we must justify actions that we know are wrong and dismiss them with "that was a different time". does time change what is right and what is wrong ? many thinkers of the time were simply wrong. it reminds me of Galileo and Copernicus and their controversies and how common sense and contemporary thinking can be wrong but supported.
Having experience of warfare, I can, I think, understand the stark fear & narrow focus of battle. You are totally zoned-in on what's in front of you. But I too my friend share in your fascination with the archaeology & artefacts of a time long past.
 
When I reenacted, I couldn't spend much time researching what really interested me, antebellum slavery, because antebellum reenactments were rare and ones that included slavery were rarer yet. Plus being a white male, and generally not part of a group, I couldn't really portray anything functional and specifically connected to slavery. I had to fit in with the organizers' plans.

Every southern white male was connected to it somehow, and so at the better events, it's always there in the background--if I portray an innkeeper, a woman and her slave ask to stay; if I portray a doctor, a neighbor loans me her slave with a lantern at night, etc.

But doing non-portrayed research is so cool. It's like I'm free--free to look at the world from a black man or woman's view, from a slave trader's view, from an overseer or coffle driver's or banker's view, or abolitionist or underground railroad operator's view, without wondering how I'm going to convince a few dozen people and/or a suitable site to cooperate, and what role is there for a middle-aged white male.

I miss seeing and feeling the thrill of having what I studied come alive (not really the way it was, but to a limited extent--you know what I mean) but it's so much broader research now, not constrained by practicalities.

As far as why I research antebellum slavery... Isn't that what everyone wants to research? I mean, it's the center of the universe, the most interesting thing, right? Why would anyone have to ask, or want to research anything else? :happy::D :D
 
When I reenacted, I couldn't spend much time researching what really interested me, antebellum slavery, because antebellum reenactments were rare and ones that included slavery were rarer yet. Plus being a white male, and generally not part of a group, I couldn't really portray anything functional and specifically connected to slavery. I had to fit in with the organizers' plans.

Every southern white male was connected to it somehow, and so at the better events, it's always there in the background--if I portray an innkeeper, a woman and her slave ask to stay; if I portray a doctor, a neighbor loans me her slave with a lantern at night, etc.

But doing non-portrayed research is so cool. It's like I'm free--free to look at the world from a black man or woman's view, from a slave trader's view, from an overseer or coffle driver's or banker's view, or abolitionist or underground railroad operator's view, without wondering how I'm going to convince a few dozen people and/or a suitable site to cooperate, and what role is there for a middle-aged white male.

I miss seeing and feeling the thrill of having what I studied come alive (not really the way it was, but to a limited extent--you know what I mean) but it's so much broader research now, not constrained by practicalities.

As far as why I research antebellum slavery... Isn't that what everyone wants to research? I mean, it's the center of the universe, the most interesting thing, right? Why would anyone have to ask, or want to research anything else? :happy::D :D
Arlington House in Birmingham does an antebellum Christmas re-creation every year over a two or three week period. It has come under fire kinda like Paula Deen, but i think it still goes on .
http://www.birminghamal.gov/about/city-directory/arlington-house/
 
African American history is one of my biggest interests. This obviously intersects with the Civil War in many significant ways from slavery to how slaves were used by the Confederates (both taken to support the war effort and those left to support the homes allowing more Confederate whites to enlist), to Contraband camps, to free Blacks in both the North and the South, etc.

I wouldn't call myself an expert however, just the an area of history I focus on probably more than others.
 
I know you didn't ask me but back in the day it would have taken about five and a half seconds to travel one mile and about thirteen to travel two miles. Muzzle velocity was about 1215 fps but of course velocity started dropping as soon as the projectile left the muzzle.

Here's a handy set of tables at a site that has a lot of useful information:

http://www.civilwarartillery.com/tables.htm

Edit: and here's a cool set of videos showing live fire from both the target and then from the battery. You can count the seconds.

I've read soldiers' accounts of the sounds the projectiles make when they're in flight. Quite interesting watching this video.
 
My two ancestors service has moved me in the direction of spending more time on cavalry (Silas in 13th PA Cav) and Vicksburg (Sterling in 43rd TN Inf). I still spend a lot of time on history of the entire war. Lately I've taken to biographies and am reading "Rebel Yell" by S. C. Gwynn.
 
I grew up in a neighborhood being developed on a battlefield, although we weren't sure of the battlefield's precise location. I gradually became aware of the skirmish / ambush / guerrilla style of war that was typically fought in central Missouri. There is a lot of oral tradition about the war because so many incidents happened in my home town. I am surrounded by all of this and I just gradually wanted to learn more and more about it. The interest in the war caused by its 150th anniversary made a wealth of information very easily accessible. It was easy to become fascinated by incidents that happened right around the area where I live.
 
I grew up in a neighborhood being developed on a battlefield, although we weren't sure of the battlefield's precise location. I gradually became aware of the skirmish / ambush / guerrilla style of war that was typically fought in central Missouri. There is a lot of oral tradition about the war because so many incidents happened in my home town. I am surrounded by all of this and I just gradually wanted to learn more and more about it. The interest in the war caused by its 150th anniversary made a wealth of information very easily accessible. It was easy to become fascinated by incidents that happened right around the area where I live.
I imagine that you have stumbled upon a few artefacts in your time. :smile:
 
I imagine that you have stumbled upon a few artefacts in your time. :smile:
A few, but nothing significant. As my street was extended or as housing lots were excavated for foundations, we found the occasional horse shoe or minnie ball.

Here's what we found LOTS of: Native American stone age tools--spanning perhaps five or ten thousand years of occupation on the same ground. This is not unique to my boyhood neighborhood. This is common all up and down the Missouri River drainage.
 
A few, but nothing significant. As my street was extended or as housing lots were excavated for foundations, we found the occasional horse shoe or minnie ball.

Here's what we found LOTS of: Native American stone age tools--spanning perhaps five or ten thousand years of occupation on the same ground. This is not unique to my boyhood neighborhood. This is common all up and down the Missouri River drainage.

Very similar to Britain in the respect of tools, over the years I have found Neolithic flint tools, axe heads, scrapers and arrow heads although the arrowheads date from a slightly later period. Sometimes we can find bits of Roman pottery and old coins a few months ago I found a small section of Roman chainmail armour, I dredged that from a river with a magnet.
 
I am blessed with living where many of the major battles are within less than an hours drive. My interest has become personal accounts from the local area. Everything from what they had for breakfast to how they felt about the war. In some ways knowing that meat was hidden it the attic of the house next door is as interesting (I've climbed up into that attic) as knowing that Grant sat and whittled during the Wilderness.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top