Sharps New Model 1865?

Real or replic?

  • Real Sharps

    Votes: 9 75.0%
  • Replic Sharps

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 3 25.0%

  • Total voters
    12

Sgt_Elias

Private
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Hello,
this rifle was sold to me an an Palmetto Sharps, but the seller dont really know it, he got it for selling it from an widow of an colleague.

I researched alot the past days, and don't find much informations.

Experts say that it must be an real Sharps, theres no replica ever made in .52 with all these markings.

Sadly some parts are missing, swivel bar, saddle ring and the orginial rearsight... just have an repro sight on it.

But i think its not an problem, find all parts instead of the sight for small price.

So, any opinion if that really an original, or an very good replica?

It haves alot of markings, small parts have an c, p or r stamped.

Best regards, David

IMG_1427.JPG
IMG_1428.JPG
IMG_1429.JPG
IMG_1435.JPG
IMG_1436.JPG
IMG_1437.JPG
IMG_1438.JPG
IMG_1439.JPG
IMG_1415.JPG
 
Last edited:
Thanks Mr. Steele :smile:

I dont know much about Sharps atm....

Whats the difference between M1863 and New Model 1865?

Just checked the serial number, its fit to M1865, and on the barrel it looks like an 5 at the end, not an 3

I think its the find of my life... just paid 240 Euros for it

Best regards, David
 
Last edited:
I was just about to ask what is the difference between the Sharps' New Model 1865 and the Sharps' New Model 1859.
One of the latter sold for £1500, in a local auction, back in July of this year. I handled the Carbine and overall it was in very good condition.
 
Thanks Mr. Steele :smile:

I dont know much about Sharps atm....

Whats the difference between M1863 and New Model 1865?

Just checked the serial number, its fit to M1865, and on the barrel it looks like an 5 at the end, not an 3

I think its the find of my life... just paid 240 Euros for it

Best regards, David
The differences are absolutely minimal and related to ease of production.

Most M1865 were converted to .50-70, those remaining in percussion usually made it into the hands of Indian Scouts during the various Indian Wars. Quite a few were sold to the French just prior to the Franco Prussian War and like the Spencer were highly regarded by those that carried them. That it managed to survive two World Wars and the anti-gun frenzy of Europe is interesting.

It is in nice condition and for 240 Euros you made out like a bandit, I would expect it would fetch 3-4 times that in the US.
 
Thanks again :)

Oh, you can buy an 1865 for under 1000 USD? An regular replica costs more than 1000 here.

So, do i have an 1865 or 1863?

Do you know the exact differences?

Best regards, David
 
Thanks for all the great Informations :)

So, what means the R.L.S. marking?

Just found out it is from Captain Robert S. LaMotte... but what it means?

Best regards, David
 
Does the forend have burn signs? The lever-to-block link and nipple look new/repro. Beautiful piece. You want a nice rear sight go to gunsamerica.com and search for sharps rear sight. Orlandof is the guys handle, and wouldn't reply to any of my emails, so I bought a cheaper one on eBay. He probably had too many hagglers like me bothering him. Price is $180.
 
Hello,
this rifle was sold to me an an Palmetto Sharps, but the seller dont really know it, he got it for selling it from an widow of an colleague.

I researched alot the past days, and don't find much informations.

Experts say that it must be an real Sharps, theres no replica ever made in .52 with all these markings.

Sadly some parts are missing, swivel bar, saddle ring and the orginial rearsight... just have an repro sight on it.

But i think its not an problem, find all parts instead of the sight for small price.

So, any opinion if that really an original, or an very good replica?

It haves alot of markings, small parts have an c, p or r stamped.

Best regards, David

View attachment 169625 View attachment 169626 View attachment 169627 View attachment 169628 View attachment 169629 View attachment 169630 View attachment 169631 View attachment 169632 View attachment 169635
Nice piece! Looks like 'the real deal' to me....
 
If you can, remove the forend screw, press on the spring and remove the band and forend. You can confirm the receiver and barrel are the same serial number. Barrel number is maybe 2-3 inches forward of the screw base.

Don't know if you stated above, but do the forend and/or stock have any pressed-in factory markings? I'm working on a '59 carbine restoration and needed many parts. Forend has a mark on the bottom rear nearest the block.

You'll need a high magnification glass to check out some numbers. What I've noticed with screw heads is that the repros have a tree ring effect. Could be wrong, but good bet. The tang screws look questionable.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top