Opinion, could this be NBForrest?

chuck_1865

Cadet
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
NBForrestdag3.jpg

Hi Group!
I am a new to this forum, and I wanted to make this post to get your opinion, since I would consider you folks the most knowledgeable regarding people of the civil war. I recently bought a 1/9th plate daguerreotype. There are no markings on it, so I do not know who the photographer was, nor where it came from originally. The dag was likely made during the mid-1850s. The subject, or person photographed however, looks remarkably like Nathan Bedford Forrest. This dag would have been made when he was a successful business man in Memphis. At this time, he would have been in his mid-30's, and would look a little younger and less "saddle-worn" than in the war photographs we are used to seeing of him. The hair, cheekbones, eyes, and general appearance looks like him. So here is the question...Do you think the person in this daguerreotype is Nathan Bedford Forrest?

Thanks!
Chuck _1865
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not believe that it is. Most of the photos of NBF are know that is not to say that there is not an unknown one out there. I can't remember the guy who owns a bunch of the originals but I would say @diane would know his name.
 
I don't think so, although the similarity is remarkable. The upper edge of his mustache doesn't match Forrest. That's a margin of the facial hair that would seldom be cut with a razor. I'll defer to Diane's opinion.
 
I do not believe that it is. Most of the photos of NBF are know that is not to say that there is not an unknown one out there. I can't remember the guy who owns a bunch of the originals but I would say @diane would know his name.

Yes, there was a poster tagged nbforrestiv who was briefly on the N B Forrest Photos thread on that forum.

Well, I've seen a couple pictures of Forrest much younger than his war pictures, and at least one of him without his beard - which is kind of weird at first! This gentleman in the daguerreotype is not N B Forrest. It's not any of his brothers, either. It's a fine picture, though - good looking gentleman!
 
Well, I've seen a couple pictures of Forrest much younger than his war pictures, and at least one of him without his beard - which is kind of weird at first!
It's always so freaky to see men without their normal facial hair--or, if they're always clean-shaven, to see them suddenly sporting facial hair. :eek:

Is the beardless Forrest picture online anywhere? I don't think I've ever seen any photo of him without facial hair.
 
It's always so freaky to see men without their normal facial hair--or, if they're always clean-shaven, to see them suddenly sporting facial hair. :eek:

Is the beardless Forrest picture online anywhere? I don't think I've ever seen any photo of him without facial hair.

I believe this photo - a daguerreotype - was taken when he was between 20 and 24, and he looked a lot younger. (Forrest is one of those people you have a really hard time visualizing as a kid!) It's located inside an original copy of the Jordan and Pryor book, and so not available online. He has a very sharp chin and sensitive mouth, which in later years was carried with firmness.

It does look like him. Did NBF have brothers?

Forrest had five full brothers and three half brothers. None of them would be the right age for this photo - there was ten years between him and John, and the rest of the full brothers. Jeff was born when Forrest was 16. The Luxtons were way younger - two of them did serve in the last couple years of the war, being just barely of age. When the war ended, 44 year old Forrest's sister was 12!
 
I believe this photo - a daguerreotype - was taken when he was between 20 and 24, and he looked a lot younger. It's located inside an original copy of the Jordan and Pryor book, and so not available online. He has a very sharp chin and sensitive mouth, which in later years was carried with firmness.
Ah okay--thank you!

(Forrest is one of those people you have a really hard time visualizing as a kid!)
Hmm You know, I never thought about that before, but now that you mention it, it is hard to visualize him as a kid!
 
There is a little oddity that might be mentioned, about people from a certain area or region looking like they are related. Today it's quite uncommon, but back then it was almost the norm. People married with inter-related people, not necessarily a blood relation but somehow connected, and so it wasn't unusual for people to look alike. Abraham Lincoln, for instance, looks like a very unusual man with distinctive features - however, in the region of Kentucky where he was born, there were lots of men who looked exactly like him! His features were not unique there - in fact, there was one fellow who looked so much like Lincoln people thought he was Lincoln's real father. (Lincoln suspected that might be so himself!)
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top