rgtaylor61
Corporal
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2021
- Location
- South Carolina
Looking for any information on WF Dawson Company E 31st Tennessee Infantry
Looking for any information on WF Dawson Company E 31st Tennessee Infantry
thank youOnly 16 when he enlisted! (actually he was 16 in 1860, so older when enlisted)
View attachment 531963
Not sure...the newspaper article lists a 123rd infantry which to my knowledge never existed..perhaps its a typo. Everything else looks accurate though. I've long been interested in the Gibson county regiments and his pension application lists him being at Franklin (another obsession)Not sure if the following is the same or a different W.F Dawson:
![]()
William F “Doc” Dawson (1844-1916) - Find a Grave...
Find a Grave memorial for William F “Doc” Dawson born 10 Apr 1844 and died 15 Oct 1916. Buried at Double Springs Cumberland Presbyterian Cemetery, Humboldt, Gibson County, Tennessee, United States of America, North Americawww.findagrave.com
Confusing story, actually. Col Thomas J Freeman was the commander of the 22nd Tennessee Infantry, but Capt. S. H. Hale was not an officer in that regiment. That was because, in mid-1862, the 22nd Tennessee got consolidated with the 12th Tennessee Infantry, of which S. H. Hale was a lieutenant in Company I. However, I can't find a William F. Dawson in any Tennessee regiment other than the 15th, 48th, or 50th, but since they don't have him in the 12th, 22nd, or even the 31st I think there might just be missing info.Not sure...the newspaper article lists a 123rd infantry which to my knowledge never existed..perhaps its a typo. Everything else looks accurate though. I've long been interested in the Gibson county regiments and his pension application lists him being at Franklin (another obsession)
The confusing records and discrepancies is a constant frustration of mine but I must love the torture because I keep coming back. His pension application clearly states Company E 31st Tennessee (a Regiment I'm particularly interested in)Confusing story, actually. Col Thomas J Freeman was the commander of the 22nd Tennessee Infantry, but Capt. S. H. Hale was not an officer in that regiment. That was because, in mid-1862, the 22nd Tennessee got consolidated with the 12th Tennessee Infantry, of which S. H. Hale was a lieutenant in Company I. However, I can't find a William F. Dawson in any Tennessee regiment other than the 15th, 48th, or 50th, but since they don't have him in the 12th, 22nd, or even the 31st I think there might just be missing info.
Doesn't really help much, but hope that clarifies the newspaper article a bit.
Yes in his pension application that comes up and several regimental members state that he in fact was with them later on. its interesting how many discrepancies there are in the cards and how conflicting they are not to mention the variances in spelling of names. Its truly addicting to research this stuff and very fun. I'm new to it but love itThe cards for W F Dawson in the 31rst show him enlisting September 2, 1861 in Trenton (Gibson County). May 20, 1862 he went out on a sick leave. That sick leave was later reclassified as a desertion. "Deserted and went home" is the succinct note at the bottom of the last muster roll for Dawson.
It would not be an unusual pattern for someone to enlist early in the War, become ill, go home, and decide to join a more local unit instead of returning to their original company.
I really appreciate this input. I've really spent time trying to see if my ancestor William W Taylor of Company E was at Franklin. WF Dawson being there dies help as William Taylor was with the 31st two weeks later when he was captured at Nashville.Trying to reconcile the above viewed discrepant information from various sources, showing the different units in which he supposedly served.
Seems the information showing W. F. Dawson served in Co. E, 31st TN Infantry, is confirmed as solid.
This finding is supported by eliminating the other units (i.e. 13, 16 & 123 TN) mentioned above that he supposedly belonged. Could not find his name appearing on the regimental rolls of either the 13 or 16 TN, and the 123 TN never existed.
From the information provided above, it seems Dawson enlisted (at least initially, on Sep. 2, '61) in Co. E, 31 TN. If he did 'desert and go home' at some time afterwards, it may have been late in the war after Franklin (as it's apparently listed in his pension application, that he was present there). Can recall reading that following Hood's Nashville Campaign, survivors in Confederate regiments were furloughed (for 30 days), before returning to their units. Decimated units were subsequently consolidated (e.g. the 4, 5, 31, 33 & 38 TN were consolidated by the time of Bentonville) and moved to NC to join 'Joe' Johnston. (Dawson may have taken his furlough in this period, and not returned to his unit).
Also thought the 'W. F. Dawson' shown in the Find-a-Grave listing displayed in Post #4 above is probably your man. The newspaper obit. attached clearly contains an inaccurate reference to a non-existent unit and its commanders. This is likely a GIGO situation, whereby someone fed wrong information to the newspaper publisher at the time. Given the inclusion of the nickname 'Doc' in this listing, wonder whether he became a doctor postwar.
Changing membership of units (from 31 TN to 12 TN Cavalry) with a period of absence in-between, makes sense if it's the same person being discussed.I don't think the desertion was late in the War. Dawson served about 8 months and went home on furlough due to illness. The date for his leaving is given as May 20, 1862. He never returned from that furlough and his status was changed to deserted. Nothing in his CMSR indicates the 31st saw him after his sick leave began.
If he joined the 12th Cavalry in October of 1863 he would have been in that unit at Franklin, if they were there.
Suspect this sort of situation might have been quite commonplace, especially among the ranks of the Confederate army in the extensive western theater later in the war - i.e. soldiers taking leave from their originally enlisted units to return home, then returning later to serve in another unrelated outfit that was perhaps loosely organized or consolidated.Colonel E. Egbert Tansil of the 31st Tennessee actually had a similar situation to Dawson -- Colonel Tansil transferred to Forrest's cavalry after Chattanooga.
Colonel Tansil's situation was related to the plight of the many supernumerary officers when Bragg's army consolidated in on itself over and over again. IIRC, Colonel Tansil was forced to transfer after his 31st Tennessee was consolidated with the 33rd Tennessee, and Colonel Warner P. Jones of the 33rd placed in command. As well as Wilson, Bell, and Nixon, already mentioned, the same occurred to Colonels R. F. Looney (38th TN), J. S. Dawson (46th TN), and Mathias Martin (23rd TN). However, in many cases, the men of their old regiments joined them -- records indicate this to be especially true for Colonel Nixon's 22nd Tennessee Cavalry.Suspect this sort of situation might have been quite commonplace, especially among the ranks of the Confederate army in the extensive western theater later in the war - i.e. soldiers taking leave from their originally enlisted units to return home, then returning later to serve in another unrelated outfit that was perhaps loosely organized or consolidated.