McClellan Gene Thorpe defends McClellan - two op-eds

Glorybound

Major
Retired Moderator
Honored Fallen Comrade
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Location
Indiana
In defense of McClellan: A contrarian view

By Gene Thorp, Published: March 2, 2012

In May 1862, the one-year-old Confederacy appeared to be on the brink of collapse. The Union had produced a string of victories from the coast of North Carolina to the far West, and a massive Federal army had just reached the outskirts of Richmond, the rebel capital, ready to destroy the nerve center of the rebellion.

Since the fall, the Confederates had lost some 40,000 men, double that of their Union counterparts. The Confederacy, with less than half the population of the North, could ill afford to take such losses.

Then the tables turned.

By the end of August, the Confederates were in central Kentucky driving hard for Louisville. In the East, not only had the Federal army been thrown back from Richmond, but it also had been driven all the way to the Washington defenses.

Who or what was responsible for such a startling reversal?

Besides the brilliant maneuvering of Confederate Gens. Robert E. Lee and Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson, conventional wisdom has pinned the blame mainly on Gen. George B. McClellan, who led the Union offensive on Richmond.

His over-cautious approach, the story goes, kept him bottled up at Yorktown for a month conducting siege warfare on a rebel army one-fifth the size of his. He vastly overestimated the strength of the enemy and made irrational calls for reinforcements. When the rebels finally retreated to Richmond, he did not pursue quickly enough. After Jackson joined Lee in Richmond and drove back the Union soldiers, McClellan withheld reinforcements from Gen. John Pope for petty political reasons, contributing to his army's defeat.

But there is another way to look at the spring and summer of 1862, and in this version, the strategic mistakes are Lincoln's.

In early March, McClellan told the president of his plan to capture Richmond. His offensive force would steam down the Chesapeake Bay to the peninsula between the York and James rivers and assault the rebel capital. His defensive force would man the forts surrounding Washington and guard the two main approaches from the south — the Piedmont and the head of the Shenandoah Valley. At the start of the campaign, McClellan had almost 190,000 men at his disposal.

How much of McClellan's army should be allocated to defense became a serious point of contention with Lincoln, who was fixated on Washington's security. McClellan's lieutenants recommended 55,000 men, leaving the main assault force with 135,000 soldiers. The number could always be adjusted by McClellan, depending on Confederate actions. On April 1, McClellan sailed down the Potomac to prepare his assault.

Three days later, without McClellan's knowledge, Lincoln held back an additional 33,000 men from McClellan's attacking force. McClellan, who had already written orders for those men, was not aware of the new arrangement until he had reached the front.

He pleaded with Lincoln to release the troops. "I beg that you will reconsider the order . . . the success of our cause will be imperiled by so greatly reducing my force when it is actually under the fire of the enemy and active operations have commenced."

Lincoln was adamant: "You now have over 100,000 troops with you. . . . I think you better break the enemy's line from Yorktown to Warwick River at once."

At the time, though, McClellan had only about 58,000 soldiers, since many of his troops were either awaiting embarkation back in Washington or still in transit. In a private note to his wife, McClellan fumed, "I was much tempted to reply that he had better come and do it himself."

He hesitated. Although the rebel force that McClellan faced was far smaller, about 11,000 men, it held an excellent defensive position, most of it behind an impassable swamp and river, 100 to 300 feet wide. To break the Confederate line, McClellan's men would have to funnel into a two-mile stretch of fortified land, swept from three sides by heavy artillery, without the benefit of their own heavy guns.

Fearing a slaughter, McClellan settled in for a siege. Over the next two weeks, the remainder of his force arrived, but so did another 40,000 Confederates.

He learned then that the 88,000 men left behind had been removed from his control and put under the direct command of Lincoln's Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, a lawyer with no military experience. McClellan could no longer control the relegation of troops between his defense and offense.

Then, in a blow that affected Union commanders on every front, Stanton closed down all recruiting stations in the North. From this point on, each Union soldier who was lost — whether from combat or disease — would not be replaced. Four days after the order, 13,047 Federals fell at Shiloh. More than 70,000 would be lost before Stanton's order was rescinded three months later.

The new strategy played directly into Confederate hands. The horrible reversals over the winter forced the Confederacy to initiate a draft, which prevented those already in the army from leaving and brought into their fold most of the remaining southerners from the ages of 18 to 35. So as the Union Army shrank, the Confederate Army grew.

Confederates also were retooling their strategy. Instead of defending every locale throughout the South, they concentrated their armies on the most important strategic points, Richmond in particular.

After one month, on the night of May 4, the siege forced the rebels to retreat, and McClellan resumed his march on Richmond. Lee stripped troops from the Atlantic coast to the Shenandoah Valley to defend his capital. Confederate records show that in one month, the number of men in front of McClellan's now-95,000-man army swelled from about 56,000 to more than 115,000. McClellan, who thought that additional Confederates had arrived from the western theater to expand the total to 200,000, anxiously telegraphed Lincoln for reinforcements. He had been promised another 35,000 men when he reached Richmond, but barely 10,000 would ever arrive.

Lincoln and Stanton, meanwhile, failed to take advantage of the newly weakened Confederate fronts. Instead, they spent their time directing the Washington defense force as it got tangled up in a wild-goose chase pursuing Jackson's small army through the Shenandoah Valley. Even McClellan's rival, Gen. Irwin McDowell, could see the folly of the venture. Pleading with Lincoln not to redirect his troops from reinforcing McClellan, McDowell wrote, "I shall gain nothing for you there, and shall lose much for you here . . . it throws us all back, and from Richmond north we shall have all our large masses paralyzed."

Lincoln would not budge. When Jackson slipped away to join Lee at Richmond, more than 60,000 Union troops sat idle in the valley without an enemy to fight.

On Jackson's arrival, the great Confederate offensive to relieve Richmond began. Without reinforcements, McClellan found his supply line exposed. In seven days of bloody assaults, Lee hammered McClellan's line back to the James River between Richmond and Petersburg. There, Union gunboats prevented further pursuit. McClellan's army was defeated, but not destroyed.
Finally, Lincoln and Stanton gave up their roles as strategists and pulled Gen. Henry Halleck from the West to take over as general in chief.

Still within striking distance of Richmond, McClellan now suggested that his army be sent south to take the critical railroad junctions at Petersburg, Va., a strategy that Gen. Ulysses S. Grant would use two years later to win the war. But Halleck ranked the security of Washington higher and decided to advance on Richmond from the north with both Pope's and McClellan's armies. On Aug. 3 McClellan was ordered to withdraw from the Peninsula and join Pope.

McClellan has been accused of stalling, but moving a large army without notice is a complex undertaking. McClellan first had to bring back part of his army, which had advanced toward Richmond under Halleck's orders. He also had to evacuate some 12,500 sick, but few transports were available, most already in use moving another command or transporting prisoners of war.

Some of the largest transports could not reach his army because the James River was too shallow. When the army did move on Aug. 14, they had to march 40-55 miles to port.

McClellan sent his infantry before his artillery and cavalry, because the latter two required more time to ship. Almost half of his army got there before they were stopped by Jackson's men who, unbeknownst to Union generals, had slipped around behind Pope.

As 1,200 of McClellan's infantry rode the train to reinforce Pope, they found Jackson's rebels with ample artillery waiting for them. Without cannons, the Federals were sitting ducks and lost a quarter of their men before they could escape. For the next two days, McClellan refused to send the remainder of his forces forward until his artillery was ready to accompany them. A frustrated Halleck overruled McClellan and ordered his troops forward, leaving McClellan without an army. (When Pope was defeated, Lincoln returned the army to McClellan.)

After the battle of Second Manassas, Lee marched north into Maryland and Lincoln called on McClellan to stop the invasion. More accusations of slowness and stupidity were leveled against him, even though he became one of the few generals to defeat Lee, in the battle of Antietam [to be addressed in the next Civil War section in September.] Finally, after the November elections, Lincoln cashiered McClellan.

Two years later, McClellan became the Democratic candidate for president. An army of newspaper writers and politicians sympathetic to Lincoln went after McClellan's character, questioning and condemning every military action he had taken in his career.

Obscured by all this were some truly great accomplishments. Perhaps the most impressive was building an army from scratch and advancing it to within six miles of the Confederate capital at a cost of 10,000 men — all within the first year of the war. That same feat was only accomplished by one other Union commander — Grant, who lost six times as many men fighting a rebel army half the size and worn out by two years of fighting and attrition.

Perhaps the greatest testament came from Lee. According to Lee's son, on the afternoon of July 15, 1870, Lee visited his first cousin and lifelong friend, Cassius Lee. When the general was asked which of the Federal generals he considered to be the greatest, "He answered most emphatically 'McClellan by all odds.' "


http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...arian-view/2012/02/27/gIQAeSLqmR_story_2.html
 
In defense of McClellan at Antietam: A contrarian view

By Gene Thorp, Published: September 7

On Sept. 17, 1862, Gen. George B. McClellan stopped Gen. Robert E. Lee's first Confederate invasion of the North at the Battle of Antietam, the bloodiest day of warfare in American history. This narrow victory changed the course of the war.

Yet history has not been kind to McClellan. Politicians from the 1860s onward and countless historians have claimed he could have easily destroyed Lee's army during the campaign and ended the war in 1862, sparing the country another two and a half years of bloody conflict.

Their criticism stems from the belief that McClellan moved too slowly and cautiously to attack Lee. They assert that when a copy of Lee's plans fell into McClellan's hands, the Union general wasted precious hours before advancing. They declare that McClellan's forces outnumbered his foe's by more than two to one and by that metric alone, he should have decimated Lee's army.

They are wrong.

Contrary to what most of the literature will tell you, McClellan was not a hesitant fool. He did his best under challenging conditions.

Scarcely two weeks before the Battle of Antietam, he was a general without a command. He had once held sway over all the Federal armies, but during the previous six months every unit under his control had been transferred to other generals.

Most had been sent to reinforce Gen. John Pope as he fought Lee on the plains of Manassas. Pope, however, was thoroughly defeated, and his demoralized troops streamed back to the capital with the Confederates close behind.

In a moment of desperation, Lincoln returned the shattered remnants of Pope's army to McClellan, hoping its former commander could reinstill the high morale the troops had possessed a year earlier.

Read the full Washington Post Civil War 150 series.

When McClellan took charge of the Union forces on Sept. 1, he inherited four separate armies, thousands of untrained recruits and numerous other small commands that needed to be made ready in a hurry. To further complicate matters, three of his senior commanders had been ordered relieved of duty, charged with insubordination against Pope.

Acting quickly
Unbeknownst to the Federals, Lee had struck north into Maryland. The cavalry was the arm of the service most likely to discover Lee's change of direction, but when McClellan took over, there was virtually none available to him.

On paper, McClellan commanded some 28 cavalry regiments. But the disastrous Manassas campaign had worn out the horses of almost half the Union regiments, while most of the remainder were stranded at Hampton Roads by gale-force winds. For the first week of the campaign, McClellan could only count on perhaps 1,500 cavalry from two regiments and a few scattered squadrons from his old army to challenge some 5,000 Confederate cavalry soldiers screening Lee's army.

Despite these handicaps, in the week it took for Lee's army to march to Frederick, McClellan's army traveled an equal distance to redeploy on the north side of Washington. This was accomplished as he reshuffled commands, had his officers under charges reinstated and prepared to fill out his army with untrained recruits.

These new men, organized into 1,000-man regiments, would account for about a fifth of McClellan's force at Antietam. Northern recruiting booths had only reopened in July, and the first of these regiments were not assembled in their home states until mid-August. Before officers learned how to issue orders or their men learned to follow them, they were sent by train to Washington and immediately marched to the front. They would learn how to fire a musket as they marched to battle.

In the second week of the campaign, Lee's army suddenly left Frederick and marched west.
As McClellan's army advanced on Sept. 13, Union soldiers stumbled upon a four-day-old copy of Lee's orders in an abandoned rebel camp. Known as Special Order No. 191, this paper revealed that Lee had dangerously split his army into five parts. Three columns had converged on Harpers Ferry to capture the Federal garrison there, a fourth column was in Hagerstown, and a fifth column was acting as a rear guard near Boonesboro, Md. Historians have debated fiercely over when the Lost Order was delivered to McClellan.

In his landmark 1983 book, "Landscape Turned Red," Stephen Sears asserts that McClellan verified before noon that the papers were legitimate, then exhibited his usual excessive caution and failed to move his army for 18 hours. To back up this theory, Sears cites a telegram that McClellan sent to Abraham Lincoln at "12 M" — which Sears says stands for meridian or noon — in which McClellan confidently informs the president that he has the plans of the enemy and that "no time shall be lost" in attacking Lee.

After the book's publication, though, the original telegram receipt was discovered by researcher Maurice D'Aoust in the Lincoln papers at the Library of Congress. It shows that the telegram was sent at midnight (the word was written out) — a full 12 hours later than Sears thought.

D'Aoust points this out in the October 2012 issue of Civil War Times in an article entitled " 'Little Mac' Did Not Dawdle."

The sequence of events most likely went like this: The Lost Orders were found "about noon," as confirmed by the unit commander, and reached McClellan shortly before 3 p.m., which is when he ordered his cavalry chief to verify that the paper was legitimate, and not some ruse planted by the rebels. Even before the orders could be verified, McClellan had the vanguard of the army, Burnside's 9th Corps, on the move at 3:30 p.m. These men filled the road west to Lee's rear guard at South Mountain well into the night. Near sundown, at 6:20 p.m., he began to issue orders for the rest of his army to move, with most units instructed to be marching at sunrise.

(They were roused from sleep at 3 a.m.) In the midst of this activity, at midnight, the general telegraphed the president to tell him what was going on.

No dilly-dallying there.

By 9 a.m. on Sept. 14, the first troops had climbed South Mountain and met the Confederate rear-guard in battle. By nightfall, McClellan's army carried the heights and forced a defeated Lee to find a new defensive position along Antietam Creek. McClellan pursued the next morning and within 48 hours initiated the Battle of Antietam, which forced Lee back across the Potomac River.

Underestimating the damage?
In his after-action report, McClellan claimed that his men buried 2,700 Confederates on the Antietam battlefield and captured 6,000 more. He could only guess at the number of wounded, but he estimated it was 18,742 men, using the ratio of killed to wounded for his own troops.

This stands in stark contrast to Confederate reports, which claimed losses of 1,674 dead, 2,292 missing and 9,451 wounded — a total of 13,417. Even discounting the wounded, the discrepancy between the two reports is almost 5,000 casualties.

Which is right? The burial grounds would indicate that McClellan's number is closer to the truth. More than 3,300 dead rebels specifically associated with the Antietam campaign can be found buried in the Confederate cemeteries in Hagerstown, Frederick, Shepherdstown and Winchester. This number is larger than McClellan's because it includes bodies buried by the Confederates themselves as well as those who died shortly after the battle.

As for the captured Confederates, McClellan's medical director, Jonathan Letterman, reported 2,500 wounded under his care following the fight. At least another 2,500 unwounded prisoners of war were transferred from the battlefield to Forts Delaware and McHenry, bringing the number of captured rebels to more than 5,000 — much closer to McClellan's figure than Lee's.

This would make what is already America's bloodiest day even more horrific than previously thought, and it would mean McClellan did more damage than he is credited with.

Underestimated strength
Perhaps the most important misconception is the number of troops Lee brought with him during his invasion. Most historians cite McClellan as having had 87,000 men and Lee around 40,000. These numbers are often used for the entire three-week campaign, with the Confederates sometimes credited with as many as 55,000 men, 15,000 of whom straggled off before the battle. But there are no complete returns for Lee's army until Oct. 10, 1862. Every historian's count is merely a best-guess estimate.

Lee filed his first return five days after the battle, noting the count is "very imperfect" and does not include cavalry or artillery. It states that on Sept. 22, he had at least 36,418 infantry. Adding a conservative number of 5,000 for the missing cavalry and artillery units would bring his total to about 41,000 troops at the end of the campaign.

Eighteen days later, on Oct. 10, Lee filed his first complete report, which showed 64,273 present for duty. This number is significant because Lee had not received a single new regiment to replace his losses; nor did he receive many, if any, recruits because the February draft law had already pulled every eligible man into the army by early summer.

If we add Lee's reported campaign losses of 13,417 (which, as already noted, are too low), it would show that Lee started the campaign with at least 75,000 men.

Most historians will explain this away by citing the Confederate claim that almost half of Lee's army — 30,000 soldiers — straggled behind. Where is the corroborating evidence? The Official Records show that some 5,000 rebels moved to Winchester at the start of the campaign, then on to Lee's army after Antietam, but what about the rest? How could any rebel straggle in Maryland — as many Confederates claimed — and not be captured by the Union army, which immediately occupied every post the retreating Confederates vacated? If the straggling took place in Virginia at the start of the campaign, who fed these 25,000-plus soldiers? Who led them? How did they all get back into Lee's army so quickly through countryside most had never been in?

The simple answer is that that Confederates had suffered a major loss and needed some way to explain it. While straggling undoubtedly occurred in the last few days before Antietam, 30,000 men were not missing for most of the campaign.

Plenty of eyewitness accounts support the 75,000 figure for Lee's army. Perhaps the most detailed comes from Dr. Lewis Steiner of the Sanitary Commission, who happened to be in Frederick on Sept. 10-11 as most of the Confederate army marched out of town. Steiner tried to count every rebel that passed him and concluded by the end of the two days that he had seen some 69,000 Confederates. However, he did not witness any cavalry or a division south of town that was also part of Lee's army. When the most conservative estimates for these troops are added to Steiner's numbers, they bring the total to well over 75,000.

So much for McClellan's outsized numerical advantage. The army he drove back was not much smaller than his own. He did it without proper cavalry support, with his superiors hoping to oust him and with a significant portion of his army untrained. And as it turns out, he inflicted more damage on Lee's army than anyone suspected.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...a0e5cc-f131-11e1-892d-bc92fee603a7_story.html
 
How much of McClellan's army should be allocated to defense became a serious point of contention with Lincoln, who was fixated on Washington's security. McClellan's lieutenants recommended 55,000 men, leaving the main assault force with 135,000 soldiers. The number could always be adjusted by McClellan, depending on Confederate actions. On April 1, McClellan sailed down the Potomac to prepare his assault.

I am writing this from work, without access to books etc., so excuse the generalities. But if memory serves me, McClellan "claimed" that he had left 55,000 to guard Washington. When Lincoln did a quick count of what was actually at or near Washington (close enough to actually defend the Capital), he discovered that what was left was nowhere near the magical 55k figure promised him by Mac. Some of the 55k had been counted twice, some were new units that hadn't even been equipped and/or sent to Washington, some were way out in West Virginia/The 'Valley' and some had indeed gone with Mac to the Peninsula. By Lincoln's reckoning, Mac had only left something like 20k to 25k at best for Washington's defense (please correct this figure...)

Cutting to the chase, Mac had basically lied to Lincoln. Lincoln (understandably) responded by demanding McDowell's corps. Given how bogged down Mac later became on the Peninsual, and given how far away (time wise) the AoP was when situated on the Peninsula (if Jackson had made a move towards Washington, how long would it have taken Mac to send reinforcements from the Peninsual...how long did it take Mac to send reinforcements to Pope???),his negligence in providing for Washington's protection is hard to understand.....and harder to forgive.

s.c.
 
Underestimated strength
Perhaps the most important misconception is the number of troops Lee brought with him during his invasion. Most historians cite McClellan as having had 87,000 men and Lee around 40,000. These numbers are often used for the entire three-week campaign, with the Confederates sometimes credited with as many as 55,000 men, 15,000 of whom straggled off before the battle. But there are no complete returns for Lee's army until Oct. 10, 1862. Every historian's count is merely a best-guess estimate.

There are a lot of numbers floating around concerning Lee's numbers at Antietam. Again, writing from work, so writing from memory. But I have seen some pretty well thought out and defended arguments that would put Lee's manpower at even less than 40k. It wasn't just normal straggling, or the odd soldier that refused to cross the river into Maryland. After leaving Frederick (and Lee's army had done nothing but fight and march, with little food, less clothing/shoes etc. prior to Frederick), many of the various pieces of the ANV were forced into virtually killing marches...particularly Jackson's divisions that followed a very round about route to get to Harper's Ferry. These men didn't fall out of the ranks (by and large) because they lacked courage - they fell out because they lacked shoes and their empty bellies lacked food, without which they could take only so many additional steps....the ANV almost literally bled men with every step after Frederick (but particularly McLaws' and Jackson's men). Lee asked his men to do the impossible. And these men came back to the ANV as quickly as they could in the days after Sept. 17th. Even on the 18th, Lee was adding men back to the ranks.

We all have our biases (I certainly do), but I personally have little patience for those that I think are trying to re-write history by claiming that Lee had 55K or more on Sept. 17th.
 
It seems very odd that Lewis Steiner should be considered the authoritative source on the strength of Lee's Army.
 
I can't get into the debate on the numbers, but I've always heard Little Mac explained as someone who did not think it was necessary to fight battles to win. You were supposed to outmaneuver you opponent and compel him to retire. This was the thinking in Europe when professional armies were expensive to train and equip, so were not risked in battle without the certainty of success. Large citizen armies changed all that. I do believe that the politicians hamstrung McClellan to the point that his effectiveness was compromised, but he must bear much of the blame for his caution and irrational overestimates of Confederate strength. I'm always stunned, though, when the armchair generals always give generals high marks for simply being aggressive and being willing to win by attrition. Such aggressive tactics cost the South far more than they did the North, and I think that fighting on the defensive was their best play. However, like chess players, the armchair generals don't seem to contemplate the horrors of battles like the Overland Campaign. That's what I like about McClellan--he doesn't believe in wasting lives.
 
I can't get into the debate on the numbers, but I've always heard Little Mac explained as someone who did not think it was necessary to fight battles to win. You were supposed to outmaneuver you opponent and compel him to retire. This was the thinking in Europe when professional armies were expensive to train and equip, so were not risked in battle without the certainty of success. Large citizen armies changed all that. I do believe that the politicians hamstrung McClellan to the point that his effectiveness was compromised, but he must bear much of the blame for his caution and irrational overestimates of Confederate strength. I'm always stunned, though, when the armchair generals always give generals high marks for simply being aggressive and being willing to win by attrition. Such aggressive tactics cost the South far more than they did the North, and I think that fighting on the defensive was their best play. However, like chess players, the armchair generals don't seem to contemplate the horrors of battles like the Overland Campaign. That's what I like about McClellan--he doesn't believe in wasting lives.

Yet McClellan commanded the US army in the bloodiest day of the civil war, bloodier than any single day of the Overland campaign, a day that wasted a lot of lives.
 
Most historians will explain this away by citing the Confederate claim that almost half of Lee's army — 30,000 soldiers — straggled behind. Where is the corroborating evidence? .... If the straggling took place in Virginia at the start of the campaign, who fed these 25,000-plus soldiers? Who led them? How did they all get back into Lee's army so quickly through countryside most had never been in?

There is corroborating evidence in the official records to support the claim that substantial straggling took place in northern Virginia.
 
One of the problems with McClellan's estimate of the forces in front of him was that it was more than the total CSA army's "present for duty" at the end of June of 1862 (169,943.) As the article notes, Little Mac thought he was facing 200,000. http://www.civilwarhome.com/armysize.htm

Settling in for a siege at Yorktown with a massive army while facing only 11,000 is a real resume killer...

I find it interesting that it wasn't until Mac was repulsed and in the process of being replaced that he would propose using his army. If it didn't make sense before, and he was so outnumbered (as the Mac and the author was/is telling us) then why would he choose to do that?
 
No sympathy here for little Mac. Reading his words of "saving the Union twice" at the time of Antietam w/out so much as one decisive victory,told me most of what I needed to know about the man. I am still glad he was around to turn the farm boys into soldiers.:happy:
 
I can't speak to the author's specific size estimates, but I've also noted the frequent under reporting of army size and casualties by Confederate armies in other theaters. While this was common for both sides, the degree of underreporting in Confederate sources is generally much greater. This can sometimes be explained by missing reports (key officers killed or commands detached.) Other times newly forming commands would be broken up by battle (happened frequently in 1861 and 1862 Confederate forces in Missouri.)

When there are known burials for the dead, at least their numbers can be better established as the author has done. This only sets the floor for minimums. In some theaters with small battles many of the dead were removed by relatives or buried by residents who cared for them at their nearby homes.
 
I am no fan of Mac's battlefield leadership, but he did have to put up with Halleck and the Lincoln administration.
 
One of the problems with McClellan's estimate of the forces in front of him was that it was more than the total CSA army's "present for duty" at the end of June of 1862 (169,943.) As the article notes, Little Mac thought he was facing 200,000. http://www.civilwarhome.com/armysize.htm
Not trying to defend Mac, but those numbers are incomplete.
The June 186 numbers come from this table:
http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/c...o=waro0127;didno=waro0127;view=image;seq=1188
which has a number of qualifiers to it -- doesnt include troops in Shenadoah or northwestern Virginia, the bulk of the Trans-Mississippi command, the Department of Henrioc, or Department of Southwestern Virginia.
 
Great post Lee! I don't agree with many of the assertions but I do agree Mac dealt with much interference from Washington. "Too many cooks spoil the broth."

IMO, I still think the turning point of the Peninsula Campaign was Jackson escaping Lincoln's and Stanton's trap in the Valley and falling on Mac's rear, rendering his supply line untenable. He also couldn't bring up his key weapons, the huge siege guns. He had to move to a secure base and in doing so had to move his army, making it vulnerable to attack, which is exactly what Lee did.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top