Few Nice Pics To Enjoy

JWheeler331

First Sergeant
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Location
Louisiana
b666d3bf.jpg


4a9bf878.jpg


1b9a2505.jpg


781841f7.jpg


1a6469ae.jpg


Captain Charles & Sergeant John Hawkins, Co. E, 38th Regiment Georgia Volunteer Infantry, Army of Northern Virginia, CSA. John was KIA leading his company in a frontal assault at the Battle of Winchester.
1/4 plate ambrotype
 
That third guy down doesn't appear to have said "no" to any weapons the photographer used as props.

Three of them have jackets so tight, especially the first one who seems not be able to fully button it, that I wonder if the jackets were also photographer props.
 
That third guy down doesn't appear to have said "no" to any weapons the photographer used as props.

Three of them have jackets so tight, especially the first one who seems not be able to fully button it, that I wonder if the jackets were also photographer props.


I think the jackets were prob. theirs but some of those guns I would think were props.
 
this is probably a stupid question,but why did the photographer color in the gold buttons and the pink cheeks? Why didnt they attempt to color the whole image?
 
this is probably a stupid question,but why did the photographer color in the gold buttons and the pink cheeks? Why didnt they attempt to color the whole image?

It was common back then for people (not just just photographers) to color the cheeks and things like gold buttons and such.
 
Great Stuff thanks for posting these pictures. I agree with the contributer who pointed out how tight the uniform jackets were which is an obvious "tell" that they were props furnished by the photographer.
 
Why didnt they color the whole picture though?

I guess I dont really know for sure. I have seen it so many times. Usually on buttons and the cheeks. I think it was done just to enhance the picture. Its possibly that if they started trying to color faces and such that the photo would be covered and damaged.
 
I guess I dont really know for sure. I have seen it so many times. Usually on buttons and the cheeks. I think it was done just to enhance the picture. Its possibly that if they started trying to color faces and such that the photo would be covered and damaged.
Yea, thats understandable. Thanks for answering my dumb question. lol
 
I read somewhere but dont remember. Maybe someone will come along who knows. What I read was that they used some time of mixture of things to get different colors. I am sure it was time consuming.
ohh I see.. yea ill bet it took for ever just to do the butons and cheeks,maby thats why they didnt color the whole picture.
 
ohh I see.. yea ill bet it took for ever just to do the butons and cheeks,maby thats why they didnt color the whole picture.

I think that and the fact that they could possibly loose some of the facial features and such if they painted over them more. I have seen some older photos that had more color to them......they were larger pictures though.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top