Early Confederate Enfield - it's here!

scooter748driver

2nd Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Location
North Carolina
As stated in a different post, I recently (and surprisingly) won a Confederate Enfield at auction. The rifle arrived last week but I've just now had time to post about it and share some pics.

I won't go into the history of the Model 1853 Enfield or how they were acquired by the Confederacy as there is plenty already written here and in books covering that info in depth. However, I will post the auction description of the rifle:

Rare Confederate Inventory Numbered and Imported Pattern 1853 Enfield Rifle Musket - American Civil War

Description

.59 caliber. 39" round barrel. SN: NSN. Blued and color casehardened finish with brass furniture and walnut stock. Single shot muzzleloading percussion military rifle musket with the barrel secured with three rounded screw clamping bands. Lock marked in two lines forward of the hammer E.P. BOND/LONDON. Left breech quadrant with the correct London commercial proof and view marks and a single "25" gauge mark to indicate .577 caliber. A weak JS/ANCHOR inspection mark is present in the wood of the toe line behind the triggerguard tang, indicating it was inspected by Confederate arms viewer in England John Southgate. A single capital B is stamped in the wood forward of the buttplate tang, indicting that EP Bond was the "furnisher" of this gun to the Confederacy as part of the 2nd Sinclair, Hamilton & Company contract (October 1861-April 1862). The buttplate tang is engraved with the Confederate inventory number 8274. The gun retains the correct pattern folding leaf rear sight that is correctly graduated to 900 yards, the musket pattern combination fixed front sight and socket bayonet lug, both sling swivels and an older replacement iron ramrod of the correct pattern.

The Confederate central government received 30,000 "Long Enfields" as part of the 2nd Sinclair, Hamilton & Company contract in the fall of 1861, with deliveries completed by the spring of the following year. These guns were inventory numbered on their buttplate tangs from 1 to 10,000 with the addition of the suffix "A" below the number for the guns in the second group of 10,000 and the suffix "B" for the guns in the third group of 10,000. This gun was part of the first 10,000 guns delivered under that contract as there is no suffix present. A database of surviving Confederate numbered Enfields from this contract indicates that roughly 1% of the guns delivered are known to survive today, with approximately 300 in private and institutional collections. A total of 21 guns are known in the 8XXX range from that contract, with four of those being delivered by the London gunmaker E.P. Bond. Sinclair, Hamilton & Co relied upon five primary "furnishers" to deliver those guns, with the largest portion of the contract for 30,000 guns going to the Birmingham makers CW James (10,000 guns) and WC Scott & Son (8,000 guns). London makers Parker, Field & Son (5,500 guns), James Kerr (500 guns) and EP Bond received the balance of the contract. Bond delivered 6,000 of the 30,000 rifle muskets, making them the third largest supplier of the group, but only the source for 20% of all of the numbered Pattern 1853 Enfields supplied to the Confederate central government.

This gun was barn found some years ago and remains in essentially untouched condition other than some old wood putty in the obverse butt near the buttplate tang added to replace an area of loss by the person who found the gun. A rare opportunity to own a legitimate, if well worn, Confederate purchased Pattern 1853 Enfield Rifle Musket that was likely in the south early enough to see combat during the spring of 1862 when thousands of these guns fought during the Peninsula Campaign and the Seven Days in the East and at Shiloh in the West.

Condition Report
Good. Bore poor, heavily oxidized and showing no rifling, apparently bored to smooth after the war. Metal heavily oxidized with a thick, dark brown patina and some moderate pitting in the breech area with scattered pitting and some surface roughness scattered over all the metal surfaces. Typical of a gun that was both barn found and which saw substantial use, both during the war and in the years after. Markings remain clear and legible in the metal, weaker in the wood. Brass furniture with a dark, uncleaned patina. Lock remains mechanically functional. Forend cap is missing, along with the wood it was attached to, leaving the forend slightly less than one inch short of full length. Wood with moderate to heavy wear, some loss from burnout behind the bolster and numerous small holes from bugs, along with indications of having been wet at some time. Wood with added filler on the obverse butt as mentioned above. Otherwise with numerous bumps, dings and mars as would be expected.


The inspection and description of this rifle was done for the auction house by none other than Tim Prince of College Hill Arsenal, one of the contributors the the book The English Connection. As was stated in the other post, having such a renowned person as Tim Prince inspect and certify this rifle's authenticity is "gold." I have since corresponded with Mr. Prince and he was most helpful regarding this rifle and its origins/history.

As you can see from the condition report, the rifle isn't pristine. In fact, it's led a hard life. But I don't care. To me the condition makes it all the more special as it definitely has that "been there, done that" appearance. And for the price paid and it's rarity, I think it's a very fortunate find and purchase.

OK, enough bragging. :dance: . Here are some pictures of my newest Confederate item.

Model 1853 Type III and the banner she served
9F8D84AA-4CEE-4EFE-89FA-08B0703D35DE.jpeg


EP Bond London
10322F22-E853-4F36-B13B-013CD5EF0D54.jpeg


Proof Marks
FCE425FC-1634-46B7-B736-CBDCAC22CE93.jpeg


B for Bond, Rifle number 8274 of the first 10,000 of this contract
8E11F1BA-1ED8-4F07-B97B-4D1114DFD25E.jpeg


JS and Anchor
469548EC-5E4C-4843-8C95-9F5D339D1686.jpeg


Original site still there
4CDA2960-791C-4B27-92A2-8EEF62FACC14.jpeg


A well read book
4E03721F-80D7-4E4A-A2C2-9E0F3D1C2EED.jpeg



A9EAE263-3853-482E-B7D2-7E7F6E193E66.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The way that the civilian British arms industry worked was rather different to the US one. The name on the plate was the name of the gunMAKER - who did not 'make' the gun! The 'maker' was the guy who organised the making of the gun - the man with the money - the contractor, who may have made some of the parts. Each maker had a number of smaller sub contractors who made the individual parts, so the stockmaker's name may be found in the barrel or ramrod channel, stamped into the wood. The lockmakers name will be on the INSIDE of the lock plate and the barrelmakers name on the underside of the barrel. Names were sometimes replaced with initials. Brass accessories, bands and ramrods will be made by other firms who may stamp their initals on them.
These parts were brought together in one place to be assembled. There were no serial numbers on any P53s, they were just used on patented arms. Each part would be stamped with an 'assembler's mark' to aid reassembly. This was made with a flat blade and took the form of a series of | , \ , /, X or V on the underside of the barrel, in the barrel channel, on the edge of the lock plate and even on screws and other components - but always out of direct sight.
1728294395768.jpeg

The | | on barrel and breech plug are the barrel assembler's mark, completed before the rifle assembly.

Unlike military and Enfield-produced weapons there were no inspector's marks although some lock parts may bear them as they were using up stock. The barrels were civilian proofed in London or Birmingham (in this case London) together with the bore. (25-bore = .577").
CSA contracts - For the 2nd contract guns, all 30,000 were engraved with a number on the butt tang by the CSA inspectors - first batch of 10,000 number only, 2nd batch with an A underneath the number and the third batch with B underneath. This would be termed a 'tracking number' today. No other contract guns were so marked, so it is quite possible to have an 'E. P. Bond' without a number, however most will bear one of the CSA acceptance marks., usually behind the triggerguard tang or toe of the butt.

BTW - Ramrods will rarely match the gun. During the Civil War, in battle, you did not replace it under the barrel but stuck it in the ground, making a re-load quicker. After the firefight you picked the nearest one and fitted it to your rifle.

** That tang pin (the screw in the barrel tang) should be flush with the tang. It is either not screwed home - or a replacement.
 
so it is quite possible to have an 'E. P. Bond' without a number, however most will bear one of the CSA acceptance marks., usually behind the triggerguard tang or toe of the butt.
I have one of those. A EP Bond with 3 CSA markings but no serial # on the butt plate. Pics and comments posted back in March 2021 but you were not a member yet. Others thought the reason was CSA did not pay up in the end so it went to the Union or it was seized from a Blockade Runner. What's your thoughts?
 
I have one of those. A EP Bond with 3 CSA markings but no serial # on the butt plate. Pics and comments posted back in March 2021 but you were not a member yet. Others thought the reason was CSA did not pay up in the end so it went to the Union or it was seized from a Blockade Runner. What's your thoughts?
I have a Confederate CH1 marked Barnett P1853.
The butt plate is not engraved on these either.
 
I have one of those. A EP Bond with 3 CSA markings but no serial # on the butt plate. Pics and comments posted back in March 2021 but you were not a member yet. Others thought the reason was CSA did not pay up in the end so it went to the Union or it was seized from a Blockade Runner. What's your thoughts?
If the CSA didn't pay up - they didn't get them. Allegedly these 'spare' guns were bought up by Federal agents and sent to arm at least two complete Union regiments and replace older weapons in other units but with Union acceptance marks.

These guns were obtained in a series of contracts. The first contract were bought 'off the shelf' apparently and included all sorts of versions - including some old P53 type 2 ( spring retained bands) which were former military guns 'sold out of service' and marked as such with the service proofs lined out and civilian proofed for sale in Britain. The second was the first big, specially manufactured contract which is probably why they were numbered - to track them in transit. The last Batch (suffix 'B') are the rarest, probably because of the tightening of the blockade. Many were dumped at sea when chased by US ships.

** Note: Several separatist states also ordered their own guns and were marked as such before delivery. They all arrived at the same time and Ordnance grabbed the lot! Georgia, in particular, complained that it's guns, marked witha large G on the butt, were being issued to anyone by Ordnance. in answer, Ordnance sent some of these numbered rifles to Georgia where they were G-marked on the butt.

The contracts - and supply - continued without this marking, but a series of acceptance marks (JS+anchor, anchor+S, SHG+(number), SHC, etc) were devised for them and used on metal and wood. For instance, LAC (London Armoury Company) sent over 70,000 which were never serialled. One big headache for the collector is that no official records were kept or they were destroyed, so no one knows how many were actually delivered or received, although there are records of orders and production this side of The Pond.
 
I have one of those. A EP Bond with 3 CSA markings but no serial # on the butt plate. Pics and comments posted back in March 2021 but you were not a member yet. Others thought the reason was CSA did not pay up in the end so it went to the Union or it was seized from a Blockade Runner. What's your thoughts?
Remember, these early guns with the numbers engraved on the brass butt plate tang are the early ones. The tens of thousands bought later by the confederate agents DON'T HAVE THOSE NUMBERS. So, most of the confederate purchases have various inspection marks, but do not and should not have the numbers on the tang. Collectors like them, but if you've got a correct gun with three confederate inspection marks, you've got a gun what was inspected by a viewer paid for by confederacy.

But, there's no way to tell if it was paid for and shipped, or shipped and captured at sea and so never reached the confederacy.

You can be sure that a captured arm sold at admiralty sale would not have had the existing confederate viewers marks struck out.
 
If the CSA didn't pay up - they didn't get them. Allegedly these 'spare' guns were bought up by Federal agents and sent to arm at least two complete Union regiments and replace older weapons in other units but with Union acceptance marks.

These guns were obtained in a series of contracts. The first contract were bought 'off the shelf' apparently and included all sorts of versions - including some old P53 type 2 ( spring retained bands) which were former military guns 'sold out of service' and marked as such with the service proofs lined out and civilian proofed for sale in Britain. The second was the first big, specially manufactured contract which is probably why they were numbered - to track them in transit. The last Batch (suffix 'B') are the rarest, probably because of the tightening of the blockade. Many were dumped at sea when chased by US ships.

** Note: Several separatist states also ordered their own guns and were marked as such before delivery. They all arrived at the same time and Ordnance grabbed the lot! Georgia, in particular, complained that it's guns, marked witha large G on the butt, were being issued to anyone by Ordnance. in answer, Ordnance sent some of these numbered rifles to Georgia where they were G-marked on the butt.

The contracts - and supply - continued without this marking, but a series of acceptance marks (JS+anchor, anchor+S, SHG+(number), SHC, etc) were devised for them and used on metal and wood. For instance, LAC (London Armoury Company) sent over 70,000 which were never serialled. One big headache for the collector is that no official records were kept or they were destroyed, so no one knows how many were actually delivered or received, although there are records of orders and production this side of The Pond.
So guess I'll have to go with your last paragraph since it has the SHC on it with a crown over it and a arrow underneath it. Also TS in a circle and IC stamped opposite the lockplate.
 
So guess I'll have to go with your last paragraph since it has the SHC on it with a crown over it and a arrow underneath it. Also TS in a circle and IC stamped opposite the lockplate.
Those are also Confederate acceptance marks but - BEWARE - they are often forged - added to guns which never saw service in the USA. Or Britain, since a number are look-alike Indian arms - or the infamous 'Khyber Pass' copies.

*I once saw an advert on a US site for one and after the long sob story of Confederate supply lines, they mentioned the markings on the lockplate - a crown with P-H beneath it. After I finished laughing ... This was a British Parker-Hale repro made in the 1980s, certainly the lock but probably the whole gun! (They are excellent shooting guns however - and they are serialled)

1728379463749.png
 
Mine is also P-H.

I'd be inclined to have Bobby Hoyt insert a liner to restore the barrel.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top