Desperate Measures: Self-Mutiliation to Avoid Service

lelliott19

Brigadier General
Moderator
* OFFICIAL *
CWT PRESENTER
Forum Host
Silver Patron
Regtl. Staff Chickamauga 2018
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Desperate Measures
When we study the common soldier of the Civil War, we often focus on stories of bravery, hardship, endurance, and such. Incidents of self-mutilation to avoid duty are rarely documented. I've seen notes suggesting that a soldier shot himself in the foot or hand before. But none as well-documented as well as this one.

Before we start, I want to be clear. The purpose of this thread isn't to sit in judgment of a long-dead soldier. Instead, it is to demonstrate a reality. Something that happened more often than people may realize.

Background
In 1861, 21-year-old James Robert Holcombe married Ellen Dura Sophia Clements in Georgia. On March 1, 1862, leaving his pregnant wife behind, James enlisted at Cedartown, Georgia. He joined the "Cedartown Guards" which became Company D of the 21st Georgia Infantry. He was described as 5 feet 11 inches tall, with a light complexion, blue eyes, and blond hair.

Once in Virginia, like many newly enlisted volunteers, James contracted some disease or camp illness. By April 21 he was admitted to Chimborazo Hospital in Richmond, where he languished sick for over three weeks before being returned to duty on May 14.

Baptism by Fire in the Valley
You might assume a soldier who resorted to "desperate measures" was a coward who never faced enemy fire but James Holcombe experienced combat. After recovering from his illness, he was rushed back to his unit just in time to join Stonewall Jackson's Shenandoah Valley Campaign. A roster of 21st Georgia combatants incudes the name "J Holcomb." There was only one man with the last name Holcomb in the regiment. Private James R. Holcomb was "present and engaged" at Front Royal and Winchester on May 23 and 24th, 1862. On May 27, just 48 hours after the victory at Winchester, he was admitted to the Winchester CSA General Hospital. He is not listed as wounded on the roster and there is no notation of the cause on the carded record.

1788736086649.webp


As this clipping shows, James was right there on the front lines. He watched his hometown buddies get torn apart, including his sergeant who was shot through the chest, and others bruised by exploding artillery shells. Maybe James didn't want to be next. Or perhaps something happened with his wife or the baby? And he felt he must go home? Whatever his motivation, James reached the breaking point in early July.

Self-Maiming: A Shot to the Right Hand
He placed the muzzle of his own musket against his right hand and pulled the trigger. He was sent to the 21st Georgia's regimental hospital. His middle finger and one of the bones in his hand were either carried away by the blast or surgeons had to operate to remove that part of his hand.
1788736338019.webp


Major Glover notes the evidence that sealed James's fate:
"He has lost the middle finger and metacarpal of the right hand by self-maiming, and deserted from the Hospital of the Regiment, about the 6th of July. His hand showed that he had shot himself, by the powder being upon and around the wound, which with his improbable statement that another had shot him, and his subsequent desertion shows that he was guilty of self-maiming in order to elude the battles of his country. Lives in Polk co Ga."

Heavy black powder burns and carbon tattooing on the skin only occurs at point-blank range. This was the exact forensic evidence Civil War surgeons used to catch members of what frustrated commanders sometimes termed "the foot-and-hand brigade."

Later Company Muster Rolls recorded the following: "Deserted. Sent to Hospital July 1862 last heard of in the mountains of Georgia."
1788737583407.webp


PostScript
James evidently managed to avoid authorities and vanished in to the mountains. Sometime prior to 1870, he took his family and migrated west to Warren, Bradley County, Arkansas where he lived a quiet, well-respected life as an Arkansas farmer. James outlived two wives and raised a large family before passing away March 8, 1927, at the age of 87.

For 65 years, he lived as a quiet neighbor, carrying a desperate secret that only a Georgia newspaper and his NARA compiled service record would remember.
 
The case of Pvte. James Robert Holcomb(e) demonstrates what differences can occur in the psychological profiles of soldiers in stressful combat conditions and that every individual has varying breaking points.

Interestingly, according to Maj. Thomas Glover's published order, it seems this officer was quick to deduce from the type of Holcombe's hand wounding, that it was a self-inflicted injury, despite the private claiming that another person shot him. (It's also noted in the official roster that this soldier was listed as 'wounded at Richmond' and 'sent to hospital in Jul. '62' before 'deserting in the mountains of Georgia'- see https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 @ p. 872). As Holcomb stated, could another soldier, friend or foe, have shot him at point-blank range?

It certainly appears that Pvte. Holcomb deserted for reasons unknown, but from the information seen, thought it is less than certain (based on the evidence viewed) that he self-maimed.

Holcomb also appears to have been deeply religious, judging by the inscription displayed on his grave marker. (See https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 ). He may have been a conscientious objector, even though he was present during Jackson's Valley Campaign, he might not have engaged in actual combat. If he held and followed deeply religious convictions at the time, is it possible that he prima facie told the truth in his statement 'that another soldier shot him' ?

Just putting this perspective out there, as a possibility to consider.
 
Last edited:
Honor is something which most Americans today don't understand and this is particularly true as to how it relates to past generations. My grandfather told me similar stories from his experiences in Vietnam. Thank you @lelliott19 for sharing this story.
I turned 15 as Vietnam ended but later I had to work with a retired Cop (he was a jerk and corrupt) that admitted he only became a Cop to avoid the draft because being in Law Enforcement apparently you were exempt from the draft. Retired now I work with an older retired guy that avoid the draft by claiming hearing problems during the physical. He had no problem with it since all his friends got drafted and never came back!
 
I turned 15 as Vietnam ended but later I had to work with a retired Cop (he was a jerk and corrupt) that admitted he only became a Cop to avoid the draft because being in Law Enforcement apparently you were exempt from the draft. Retired now I work with an older retired guy that avoid the draft by claiming hearing problems during the physical. He had no problem with it since all his friends got drafted and never came back!
Too bad. After all, someone had to take their place. Wonder if either of them ever thought about that.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if you could positivity avoid the draft as a police officer, probably need draft board to ok it, but more than likely they would. Necessary jobs. I actually have a certain group of relatives who's ancestors served with the 11th GA Infantry CSA during the War. These family members have never served in the military since then..At least they hadn't since I was a kid. They were all state or local police or firemen. They would not take a federal job under any circumstance. They didn't mutilate themselves and were not corrupt...put their life on the line all the time. They just put the Die in Die Hard.
 
The case of Pvte. James Robert Holcomb(e) demonstrates what differences can occur in the psychological profiles of soldiers in stressful combat conditions and that every individual has varying breaking points.

Interestingly, according to Maj. Thomas Glover's published order, it seems this officer was quick to deduce from the type of Holcombe's hand wounding, that it was a self-inflicted injury, despite the private claiming that another person shot him. (It's also noted in the official roster that this soldier was listed as 'wounded at Richmond' and 'sent to hospital in Jul. '62' before 'deserting in the mountains of Georgia'- see https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 @ p. 872). As Holcomb stated, could another soldier, friend or foe, have shot him at point-blank range?

It certainly appears that Pvte. Holcomb deserted for reasons unknown, but from the information seen, thought it is less than certain (based on the evidence viewed) that he self-maimed.

Holcomb also appears to have been deeply religious, judging by the inscription displayed on his grave marker. (See https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 ). He may have been a conscientious objector, even though he was present during Jackson's Valley Campaign, he might not have engaged in actual combat. If he held and followed deeply religious convictions at the time, is it possible that he prima facie told the truth in his statement 'that another soldier shot him' ?

Just putting this perspective out there, as a possibility to consider.
Thank you for bringing this thoughtful perspective to the thread! You hit on some excellent points that encourage us to look past the language of the "$30 Reward" bounty and consider alternative theories. The entry you pulled from Lillian Henderson's roster - where Holcomb was recorded as "wounded at Richmond" prior to the notation that he deserted. Perhaps at some point his wound was treated as a legitimate combat injury?

When you look at the mechanics, Holcomb would have probably been carrying a Springfield or Enfield rifle-musket. The length of these makes it physically impossible for a soldier to hold that weapon and pull the trigger with their own finger to shoot themselves in the hand. To do it would have required a workaround. Possibly using the ramrod or a long stick.

What if Holcomb was telling the truth when he claimed "another had shot him." Looking at the sequence of events.... On June 27, 1862 at Gaines' Mill, Holcomb's regiment (21st Georgia) assaulted the Union right. They were funneled in a piecemeal charge through swampy, tangled creek bed under artiillery fire and musketry. Holcomb's commanding officer, Lt. Col. Hooper, was shot through the arm and the 21st GA lost heavily. The fighting July 1 at Malvern Hill was chaotic. If there was overlap and tangled lines, it's possible that a comrade standing next to him (or in front or behind) accidentally discharged his gun into Holcomb's right hand.

That would match the catastrophic damage (losing the middle finger and metacarpal) and the heavy black powder burns and "tattooing" that Major Glover used as evidence. If it was a friendly fire incident, your theory about Holcomb's religious character brings up another possibility: What if Holcomb chose to take the blame, rather than name the man who accidentlaly shot him? Faced with the accusations and the evidence, maybe Holcomb realized a court-martial would never believe him anyway? So he escaped the hospital and took his chances in the mountains.

We will probably never know exactly what happened, but it's why I love discussing these micro-histories here. Thanks again for digging up the roster.
 
Desperate Measures
When we study the common soldier of the Civil War, we often focus on stories of bravery, hardship, endurance, and such. Incidents of self-mutilation to avoid duty are rarely documented. I've seen notes suggesting that a soldier shot himself in the foot or hand before. But none as well-documented as well as this one.

Before we start, I want to be clear. The purpose of this thread isn't to sit in judgment of a long-dead soldier. Instead, it is to demonstrate a reality. Something that happened more often than people may realize.

Background
In 1861, 21-year-old James Robert Holcombe married Ellen Dura Sophia Clements in Georgia. On March 1, 1862, leaving his pregnant wife behind, James enlisted at Cedartown, Georgia. He joined the "Cedartown Guards" which became Company D of the 21st Georgia Infantry. He was described as 5 feet 11 inches tall, with a light complexion, blue eyes, and blond hair.

Once in Virginia, like many newly enlisted volunteers, James contracted some disease or camp illness. By April 21 he was admitted to Chimborazo Hospital in Richmond, where he languished sick for over three weeks before being returned to duty on May 14.

Baptism by Fire in the Valley
You might assume a soldier who resorted to "desperate measures" was a coward who never faced enemy fire but James Holcombe experienced combat. After recovering from his illness, he was rushed back to his unit just in time to join Stonewall Jackson's Shenandoah Valley Campaign. A roster of 21st Georgia combatants incudes the name "J Holcomb." There was only one man with the last name Holcomb in the regiment. Private James R. Holcomb was "present and engaged" at Front Royal and Winchester on May 23 and 24th, 1862. On May 27, just 48 hours after the victory at Winchester, he was admitted to the Winchester CSA General Hospital. He is not listed as wounded on the roster and there is no notation of the cause on the carded record.

View attachment 589313

As this clipping shows, James was right there on the front lines. He watched his hometown buddies get torn apart, including his sergeant who was shot through the chest, and others bruised by exploding artillery shells. Maybe James didn't want to be next. Or perhaps something happened with his wife or the baby? And he felt he must go home? Whatever his motivation, James reached the breaking point in early July.

Self-Maiming: A Shot to the Right Hand
He placed the muzzle of his own musket against his right hand and pulled the trigger. He was sent to the 21st Georgia's regimental hospital. His middle finger and one of the bones in his hand were either carried away by the blast or surgeons had to operate to remove that part of his hand.
View attachment 589314

Major Glover notes the evidence that sealed James's fate:
"He has lost the middle finger and metacarpal of the right hand by self-maiming, and deserted from the Hospital of the Regiment, about the 6th of July. His hand showed that he had shot himself, by the powder being upon and around the wound, which with his improbable statement that another had shot him, and his subsequent desertion shows that he was guilty of self-maiming in order to elude the battles of his country. Lives in Polk co Ga."

Heavy black powder burns and carbon tattooing on the skin only occurs at point-blank range. This was the exact forensic evidence Civil War surgeons used to catch members of what frustrated commanders sometimes termed "the foot-and-hand brigade."

Later Company Muster Rolls recorded the following: "Deserted. Sent to Hospital July 1862 last heard of in the mountains of Georgia."
View attachment 589318

PostScript
James evidently managed to avoid authorities and vanished in to the mountains. Sometime prior to 1870, he took his family and migrated west to Warren, Bradley County, Arkansas where he lived a quiet, well-respected life as an Arkansas farmer. James outlived two wives and raised a large family before passing away March 8, 1927, at the age of 87.

For 65 years, he lived as a quiet neighbor, carrying a desperate secret that only a Georgia newspaper and his NARA compiled service record would remember.
 
Honor is something which most Americans today don't understand and this is particularly true as to how it relates to past generations. My grandfather told me similar stories from his experiences in Vietnam. Thank you @lelliott19 for sharing this story.
When I was in Vietnam, we had a guy shoot himself in the foot with a .45 Automatic. I don't know if he was punished or not.
I often wonder what he thinks of himself today?
 
The case of Pvte. James Robert Holcomb(e) demonstrates what differences can occur in the psychological profiles of soldiers in stressful combat conditions and that every individual has varying breaking points.

Interestingly, according to Maj. Thomas Glover's published order, it seems this officer was quick to deduce from the type of Holcombe's hand wounding, that it was a self-inflicted injury, despite the private claiming that another person shot him. (It's also noted in the official roster that this soldier was listed as 'wounded at Richmond' and 'sent to hospital in Jul. '62' before 'deserting in the mountains of Georgia'- see https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 @ p. 872). As Holcomb stated, could another soldier, friend or foe, have shot him at point-blank range?

It certainly appears that Pvte. Holcomb deserted for reasons unknown, but from the information seen, thought it is less than certain (based on the evidence viewed) that he self-maimed.

Holcomb also appears to have been deeply religious, judging by the inscription displayed on his grave marker. (See https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044090078676&seq=888 ). He may have been a conscientious objector, even though he was present during Jackson's Valley Campaign, he might not have engaged in actual combat. If he held and followed deeply religious convictions at the time, is it possible that he prima facie told the truth in his statement 'that another soldier shot him' ?

Just putting this perspective out there, as a possibility to consider.
I believe that the record of self-mutilation is the truth.
 
It would also be technically true that "another person shot him" if he asked that person to do so and he complied (for whatever reason - on both their parts).

It's also difficult to commit suicide by shooting yourself in the head with a rifle, but I've seen autopsy photos where the person was successful and photos that showed how it was done. That's when I found out that the big manilla envelope in the case folder didn't have any words in it, just pictures. The pathologist didn't have any objections to me looking at them, though.
 
 
He may have been a conscientious objector, even though he was present during Jackson's Valley Campaign, he might not have engaged in actual combat. If he held and followed deeply religious convictions at the time, is it possible that he prima facie told the truth in his statement 'that another soldier shot him' ?
Interesting question. I don't think there was much recourse for a CO during the Civil War, especially on the Confederate side.
AR
 
When you look at the mechanics, Holcomb would have probably been carrying a Springfield or Enfield rifle-musket. The length of these makes it physically impossible for a soldier to hold that weapon and pull the trigger with their own finger to shoot themselves in the hand. To do it would have required a workaround. Possibly using the ramrod or a long stick.
My instant thoughts too, upon reading the report.
Unless he was ambidextrous, can imagine it would have been made extra difficult to exercise the action, if he were indeed right-handed (and used his uncustomary left-hand to discharge the weapon in such circumstances). Raises the question of whether he was right or left handed.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top