This seems like a good place to mention that Howell Cobb was the uncle of Mildred Lewis Rutherford, the Historian General of the UDC and a major figure in crafting and perpetuating the Lost Cause narrative in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
I could make a rather discourteous remark about how much of a shame that is, but I'll settle for noting that their eyes were what caught my attention as far as "family resemblance".
How about killing for Freeing Slaves and Preserving Unions? The Apostle Paul is on record as supporting the Fugitive Slave Law... centuries before it ever happened...
I'm sorry Diane left before the Secret Twenty guy got to who exactly the Devil is, in his version. ( One of him, I guess the other five are made up for ballast, all that ego, he'd fall over walking down the street and the rest are the voices in his head- shhh, they'll hear you ) Trying to figure out if it's to be Lincoln or if they're all implying the Forces if Darkness are his own little, awful elflings. Hmmmm.
Well, he's talking about Philemon 1 and Onesimus, the runaway slave that Paul sent back to his master. It's not as straightforward as one might think, though. The following is from Wikipedia, Epistle to Philemon:
The modern scholarly consensus is that Onesimus was a runaway slave who became a Christian believer. Paul sent him back to face his aggrieved master, and sought in this letter to effect reconciliation between these two Christians. What is problematic is how Onesimus came to be with Paul. Various suggestions have been given: Onesimus being imprisoned with Paul; Onesimus being brought to Paul by others; Onesimus coming to Paul by chance (or in the Christian view, by divine providence); or Onesimus deliberately seeking Paul out, as a friend of his master's, in order to be reconciled.
However, Onesimus' status as a runaway slave was challenged by Allen Dwight Callahan in an article published in the Harvard Theological Review. In this article Callahan notes that the weight of proving Onesimus' servile identity falls on verse 16 [for reference, verses 15 and 16: thou shouldest receive him for ever; 16 Not now as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved, specially to me, but how much more unto thee, both in the flesh, and in the Lord?]; beyond this "nothing in the text conclusively indicates that Onesimus was ever the chattel of the letter's chief addressee. Moreover, the expectations fostered by the traditional fugitive slave hypothesis go unrealized in the letter. Modern commentators, even those committed to the prevailing interpretation, have tacitly admitted as much."
It seems that while Paul was imprisoned in Rome for preaching Christ, he did not cease to preach the gospel; and under his preaching, a servant by the name of Onesimus was converted by Paul, and becoming a true child of God, he made it known to his spiritual father, "St. Paul," that he was a fugitive slave from the service of one Philemon. Onesimus became a great comforter to St. Paul, after his (Onesimus) conversion. Yet as soon as Paul learned that Onesimus was a fugitive slave, and had a Christian master, he rested not until he got Onesimus ofi' to his master Philemon, with the epistle alluded to; though he needed Onesimus much to 'wait on him, but he could not consent to keep him there without his master's (" Philemon") permission. Therefore he started him with the letter to his _master, and by that letter he intercedes between Philemon and his fugitive servant Onesimus, thereby to get Philemon to pardon his servant, and if he would do so, and take him back to his service, he (Paul) would pay for whatever 'Onesimus might have takenfrom his master previous to his flight. See 18th verse. "If he hath wronged thee, or oweth thee aught, put that on mine account."
How does this contrast with modern abolitionism, the underground railroad, the negro female conductor, andthe Boston congregation alluded to in a previous chapter.
This seems like a good place to mention that Howell Cobb was the uncle of Mildred Lewis Rutherford, the Historian General of the UDC and a major figure in crafting and perpetuating the Lost Cause narrative in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
The south...that seceded, that stole federal property, that fired on federal ships and seized federal forts, that imprisoned federal soldiers, that fired on Sumter, that started the war...the south. That is historical fact and whether you or others want to or not, it cannot be disputed. It...is...fact.
Yes, that is the normal American narrative(excuse) that someone else has always started it, never mind the provocations, interference, and interventions.
Yes, that is the normal American narrative(excuse) that someone else has always started it, never mind the provocations, interference, and interventions.
Yes, that is the normal American narrative(excuse) that someone else has always started it, never mind the provocations, interference, and interventions.
Probably so, do you know any Neo-Confederates? You seem to think you can pick them out of the woodwork. If you think I'm one then you've definitely flipped your lid.