Grant What the Halleck?!

Joined
Jan 24, 2017
When reading Ulysses S. Grant's memoirs, and discovering his relationship with Henry Halleck, I found myself perplexed. Much like Grant himself it seems.

It wasn't until I started reading Brooks D. Simpson's biography that some light was eventually shed on this perplexing relationship.

Below are my own notes in summary of what I've taken from the biography (Ch.8 Under a Cloud), which show the machinations at work behind the scenes after Grant's victory at Fort Donelson:

Grant declares to Julia that there are no two men he would prefer serving under than Halleck and McClellan! Neither returned the favour. Halleck had been telegraphing McClellan to replace Grant with his own choice of General while Grant had been marching and fighting. Halleck had also rushed to take credit for Grant's victory at Donelson. Lincoln submitted only one name for promotion and that was Grant's. He now outranked everyone in Halleck's Dept except for Halleck himself (as Major General of Volunteers).

Halleck became disgruntled and began grumbling about Grant. Halleck eventually accused Grant of 'neglect and inefficiency' which McClellan responded to by authorizing Halleck to place Grant under arrest 'if the good of the service requires it' and replace him with Smith. Stanton approved of these actions. Halleck welcomed and acted on the order placing Smith in charge and subsequently wrote to Washington suggesting Grant had 'resumed his former bad habits'. Grant was unaware of this missive as he opened Halleck's wire placing Smith in charge. It both puzzled him and pained him.

More telegraphs from Halleck arrived chastising Grant, while also twisting the circumstances of Grant's relief of command to be that of McClellan's doing and not his own. This last charge hurt Grant deeply and he asked to be relieved of duty under Halleck. Halleck advised Grant there was no 'enemy' standing between him and Grant, but a later investigation proved there was a disloyal telegraph operator who had been part of the problem in terms of communications. Either way, it was Halleck who set the wheels in motion regarding these events.

Grant smarted under further rebukes from Halleck, though he did not suspect Halleck was the author of his troubles. And once again asked to be relieved. He may have suspected Lincoln for the troubles that now beset him as he had offended some of Lincoln's close friends. Surely miscommunications with Halleck could not be the reason.

Lincoln instructed Stanton to request proof of the charges against Grant from Halleck. The request came in the wake of McClellan's removal from command and Halleck, having got what he wanted, rushed to cover his footsteps assuring Grant of command into the future. Grant was informed by Washburne's brother that he suspected personal jealousy was at the root of Halleck's behaviour.

Grant accepted Halleck's explanation with relief and didn't blame him, having thought highly of him at the time and believing he had shielded him from critics in Washington.


Grant asked twice to be relieved from duty, the first request being shrugged off by Halleck, when after further rebuke complaining of "the want of order & discipline, and the numerous irregularities in your command" Grant felt he could take no more and asked to be relieved a second time: "There is such a dispostion to find fault with me that I again ask to be relieved from further duty until I can be placed right in the estimation of those higher in authority".

As Grant waited for Halleck's reply, he pondered his future, "greatly mortified", as one officer put it, at Halleck's treatment of him. Once more rumors circulated that the real reason behind Halleck's action was that Grant had taken to drink again. The charge infuriated Colonel Webster. "It is vile slander, out of whole cloth," he explained in a letter home. "During all my acquaintance with him I have never seen him drink anything intoxicating but once, & then he put a little brandy into some medication to disguise the taste". Nor was Webster the only loyal friend. One afternoon a delegation of officers came aboard his headquarters boat. They had something for him - a presentation sword. Four men, including two named in the anonymous letter about irregularities forwarded by Davis, had chipped in to buy it. Colonel C.C. Marsh of the 20th Illinois, speaking for the group, commented that the sword had been some weeks delayed in coming, but that this had proven fortuitous, "because at this moment when the jealousy caused by your brilliant success has raised up hidden enemies who are endeavoring to strike you in the dark it afforded us an opportunity to express our renewed confidence in your ability as a commander". This proved too much for Grant. Never a master with the spoken word, he choked up, then left the room to hide his tears. When he returned, the sword was still there in its case, its ivory handle mounted in gold. Grant looked at Dr. John H. Brinton, the army's surgeon, who had found him on deck. "Doctor, send it to my wife. I will never wear a sword again".

Brooks D. Simpson, Ulysses S. Grant Triumph Over Adversity, pg 123-4.

So, having been perplexed, I am perplexed no longer. Henry Halleck had an issue with Grant, one that Grant couldn't understand, and the only possible explanation given seems to be an issue of personal jealousy. I wonder what others think?
 
Last edited:
Yet as time went by Halleck regarded Grant somewhat more favorably. I suppose Halleck thought Grant was superior to McClernand.
 
To me, there was a certain amount of jealousy involved - think Halleck wanted to try himself as a real battle field commander. He'd written the book on the subject, after all! He discovered he was not cut out for active ground command - Grant was. However, his insinuation that Grant might be drinking again was based on plans by Grant that he (Halleck) thought reckless and he knew why Grant had left the army before. McClellan's motives, as Grant mentioned in his memoirs, are a mystery! Both were likely really thinking of the good of the service, to give them the benefit of the doubt. The big favor he did Grant was to salvage Sherman. Halleck knew Sherman very well, and knew he deserved a second chance after his problem in Kentucky.
 
Halleck was a jealous and vain man who desired command but not responsibilty. He treated Grant poorly and attempted to stand on Grant's successes till he realized that his actions were being recorded and he would be held responsible. Grant was the better man and it showed.
Regards
David
 
I can definitely move this forward. Won't be able to argue against this until late late tonight or tomorrow morning. I'll keep it nice and friendly.
 
Oh, and Mr. Simpson is the person who wrote that he believed Halleck's order to entrench was wrongly rewritten in the O.R. correct?
 
I would chalk it all up to the rather chaotic "politics" of the military in the earlier stages of the war. Grant had never achieved anything close to the rank he was thrust into, so he was bound to ruffle some feathers among the more established brass. I think for Halleck specifically Grant represented someone that showed initiative, too much in fact for a cautious General such as himself. He may have pegged Grant as a maverick and everything that occurred regarding communications, rumors etc. only served to "confirm" his suspicions. When it became apparent that Grant was more of an asset than a liability they developed a respectful relationship for the remainder of the war. Grant was honorable enough to respect Halleck "Old Brains" for his military acumen and his organizational skills as Chief of Staff at the end of the war were crucial. On a side note: Halleck married Elizabeth Hamilton (16 years younger) the granddaughter of Alexander Hamilton.

"Although he had impressive credentials, Henry Halleck was not an easy man to work for. The nature of his job and his personality often provoked antagonism, hatred, and contempt. Halleck's strengths were organizing, coordinating, planning, and managing. He could also advise and suggest, and he sometimes ordered subordinates where and when to make a move, but he never was comfortable doing it himself. Halleck seldom worked openly, and as a department commander, he was always at headquarters, separated and aloof from the men. His decisions were the result of neither snap judgments nor friendly discussion, but calculated thinking. He was also prone to violent hatred and never cultivated close relationships. Overall, he generated no love, confidence, or respect."

— Kendall D. Gott, Where the South Lost the War
 
More telegraphs from Halleck arrived chastising Grant, while also twisting the circumstances of Grant's relief of command to be that of McClellan's doing and not his own. This last charge hurt Grant deeply and he asked to be relieved of duty under Halleck. Halleck advised Grant there was no 'enemy' standing between him and Grant, but a later investigation proved there was a disloyal telegraph operator who had been part of the problem in terms of communications. Either way, it was Halleck who set the wheels in motion regarding these events.

I read the section of the Chernow biography that discussed the telegraph operator who didn't actually transmit the telegraphs that Grant intended to send to his superiors.

I am fascinated by this because:

1.) In Julia Grant's memoir, she wrote about how her own father sent a telegraph from Washington to Baltimore a year after the telegraph line was put into operation there, and how he received a response within an hour. The event was such a big deal for him that he kept the telegraph repeater tape and he brought it home to St. Louis to show it to his family.


2.) When Grant was stationed in Sackets Harbor in the 1850's, he was supposed to take leave to meet Julia at the train station in Detroit. Julia was supposed to send a telegraph to Grant from St. Louis before she left St. Louis on the train for Detroit. He was supposed to be in Detroit by the time that she arrived in Detroit. Well, Grant wasn't in Detroit when she got there. She had to travel alone to Sackets Harbor with an infant. The day after she arrived in Sackets Harbor, Julia's telegraph to Grant arrived in Sackets Harbor IN THE SNAIL MAIL.

3.) The Grants were becoming acquainted with a new piece of communications technology, and they were starting to depend upon this technology. Julia depended on the telegraph when she travelled to join Grant in the 1850's at Sackets Harbor. Grant depended on the technology (and so did his military career!) throughout the war, but especially in the pre-Vicksburg part of the war when he was trying to prove himself and rehabilitate his reputation. And on both of these instances, the technology failed them.

I found so many comparisons between the Grant family's dependence on the telegraph and some high profile communications failures that happened recently.
 
I read the section of the Chernow biography that discussed the telegraph operator who didn't actually transmit the telegraphs that Grant intended to send to his superiors.

I am fascinated by this because:

1.) In Julia Grant's memoir, she wrote about how her own father sent a telegraph from Washington to Baltimore a year after the telegraph line was put into operation there, and how he received a response within an hour. The event was such a big deal for him that he kept the telegraph repeater tape and he brought it home to St. Louis to show it to his family.


2.) When Grant was stationed in Sackets Harbor in the 1850's, he was supposed to take leave to meet Julia at the train station in Detroit. Julia was supposed to send a telegraph to Grant from St. Louis before she left St. Louis on the train for Detroit. He was supposed to be in Detroit by the time that she arrived in Detroit. Well, Grant wasn't in Detroit when she got there. She had to travel alone to Sackets Harbor with an infant. The day after she arrived in Sackets Harbor, Julia's telegraph to Grant arrived in Sackets Harbor IN THE SNAIL MAIL.

3.) The Grants were becoming acquainted with a new piece of communications technology, and they were starting to depend upon this technology. Julia depended on the telegraph when she travelled to join Grant in the 1850's at Sackets Harbor. Grant depended on the technology (and so did his military career!) throughout the war, but especially in the pre-Vicksburg part of the war when he was trying to prove himself and rehabilitate his reputation. And on both of these instances, the technology failed them.

I found so many comparisons between the Grant family's dependence on the telegraph and some high profile communications failures that happened recently.

To be fair, there was a huge improvement in the telegraph system through the war
 
I will follow up on the details about the telegraph operator. It appears there was some deliberate interference on his part.
 
I will follow up on the details about the telegraph operator. It appears there was some deliberate interference on his part.
Well, I can't find much more on this except there was a 'disloyal telegraph operator' in the mix and that 'there were also solid reasons for the mishap, including some erratic communications and the intercepted messages'. Apparently Halleck stated he'd addressed daily enquiries to Grant, but there are no records of these, so it appears he was also 'stretching the truth'.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top