Virginia Cavalry Saber find

scooter748driver

2nd Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Location
North Carolina
A friend let me know about an auction this past Friday. I wasn't in the market for anything but thought I'd browse the listings to see if anything caught my eye. This did. It is a Virginia manufactured cavalry saber (Type 3 I think but that's a guess). As you can see it's in relic condition. I've seen a few for sale before and, while they are interesting sabers to me, they always seem to be priced ridiculously high even in relic condition.

On a whim I decided to place a bid on it just for the heck of it. My max was low and I thought if I won it great and if not then no big deal. Well, wouldn't you know it - I won it :smile:. What makes this special - to me at least - is that the spine is marked "4th Va Regmt." I have no idea how many of these were made by Virginia or how many went to this regiment, but I find it interesting to be able to identify the unit this one served with.

I haven't received it yet but when I do I'll post better pics. Here is a pic from the auction. I will probably leave it in relic condition, but I'd like to hear thoughts on having a handle/grip put on it. Think that would "ruin" it or take away from it??? Thanks.

VA saber.jpg
 
Last edited:
Congrats! I missed this but picked up another bargain at the same sale. Lot 92051 was listed as
"US NAVY M1860 NAVAL CUTLASS By AMES". Looking closer at the description, I saw the blade was stamped ""US A.D.K. 1864", which let me know that rather than an ordinary Navy M1861 cutlass this was one of the rare Army examples. Ames received a contact from the Army on 18 January 1864 for 300 Navy-pattern cutlasses which it delivered on 10 February. These Army cutlasses were issued to Col. William A. Howard's New York Volunteer Artillery Regiment's "marine artillery" units manning gun boats used on the James River and other streams. They differed from the Navy versions by having the inspector initials "A.D.K" (for Army inspector A. D. King) instead of "D.R." (Daniel Reynolds) stamped of the blade and pommel and "U.S." instead of "U.S.N."on the ricasso. The sword is in rather ratty condition as these usually are. It appears to be unique in that it still has the original wire wrap on the grip. All of the other example I have seen have had the wire wrap removed and the grips jacked as part of a post-war modification. It sold at the hammer price of 390 plus 20% buyers premium. Obviously neither the Auction House nor the other bidders recognized this as being a rare variety.
_nc_ohc=Q1414NJq_oYAX92pPsc&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Congrats! I missed this but picked up another bargain at the same sale. Lot 92051 was listed as
"US NAVY M1860 NAVAL CUTLASS By AMES". Looking closer at the description, I saw the blade was stamped ""US A.D.K. 1864", which let me know that rather than an ordinary Navy M1861 cutlass this was one of the rare Army examples. Ames received a contact from the Army on 18 January 1864 for 300 Navy-pattern cutlasses which it delivered on 10 February. These Army cutlasses were issued to Col. William A. Howard's New York Volunteer Artillery Regiment's "marine artillery" units manning gun boats used on the James River and other streams. They differed from the Navy versions by having the inspector initials "A.D.K" (for Army inspector A. D. King) instead of "D.R." (Daniel Reynolds) stamped of the blade and pommel and "U.S." instead of "U.S.N."on the ricasso. The sword is in rather ratty condition as these usually are. It appears to be unique in that it still has the original wire wrap on the grip. All of the other example I have seen have had the wire wrap removed and the grips jacked as part of a post-war modification. It sold at the hammer price of 390 plus 20% buyers premium. Obviously neither the Auction House nor the other bidders recognized this as being a rare variety.
View attachment 471656

Nice!!! I saw that one but not being well versed in cutlasses didn't recognize it for what it is. A great example of doing the research beforehand so that these hidden treasures don't slip by. That's how I ended up with a Confederate shotgun. Congrats!
 
A friend let me know about an auction this past Friday. I wasn't in the market for anything but thought I'd browse the listings to see if anything caught my eye. This did. It is a Virginia manufactured cavalry saber (Type 3 I think but that's a guess). As you can see it's in relic condition. I've seen a few for sale before and, while they are interesting sabers to me, they always seem to be priced ridiculously high even in relic condition.

On a whim I decided to place a bid on it just for the heck of it. My max was low and I thought if I won it great and if not then no big deal. Well, wouldn't you know it - I won it :smile:. What makes this special - to me at least - is that the spine is marked "4th Va Regmt." I have no idea how many of these were made by Virginia or how many went to this regiment, but I find it interesting to be able to identify the unit this one served with.

I haven't received it yet but when I do I'll post better pics. Here is a pic from the auction. I will probably leave it in relic condition, but I'd like to hear thoughts on having a handle/grip put on it. Think that would "ruin" it or take away from it??? Thanks.

View attachment 471633
Congratulations on your win. Being an untouched Third Model (evidenced by clip point of blade) probably made between 1816 to 1821. From a collector's stand point, it is considered best to enjoy it as found and not restore grips
 
For a cleaned-up version of the sword, also issued to the 4th Va Regt like the one above, go to the url:

Apparently there were only 4 regiments.

For a discussion of the Virginia Manufactory with pictures see url:

The site was destroyed by the construction of a new headquarters building for MeadWestvaco in 2009.
 
For a cleaned-up version of the sword, also issued to the 4th Va Regt like the one above, go to the url:

Apparently there were only 4 regiments.

For a discussion of the Virginia Manufactory with pictures see url:

The site was destroyed by the construction of a new headquarters building for MeadWestvaco in 2009.

The Regimental markings on the pre-war swords regard the cavalry regiments of the Virginia Militia in the ante-bellum period. From 1806, the militia cavalry companies in each Division of militia were to compose essentially a regiment. To this end, each regiment of militia within the division was to raise a company of cavalry:

1685796189850.png


From the 1819 Militia law, this continued:

1685794991919.png




The 4th Regiment of Cavalry (VA Militia) was among the militia mobilized during the Nat Turner rebellion in Southhampton County in 1831:

1685793885940.png

Alexandria Gazette, Dec. 9, 1831.

From the Virginia Militia laws: 1858 there were five regiments of cavalry, again, one to each division of militia.
1685794468226.png


The 4th Division of Virginia militia, to which the 4th Cavalry Regiment was attached, then consisted of:
1685794627667.png
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top