USS Galena

I have a post on my website about a surviving 100-Pounder Parrott of Galena:

https://www.santee1821.net/preserve...fle-of-uss-galena-in-newmanstown-pennsylvania

Among printed sources, there is none better than:

Canney, Donald L. The Old Steam Navy: Frigates, Sloops, and Gunboats, 1815-1885. Naval Institute Press, 1990.

I also found this page in the April 19th, 1862 edition of Scientific American to be helpful in explaining Galena's armor.

coo.31924080787702-seq_248.webp
 
Keep in mind that the Galena built in 1861-1862 and the Galena as "rebuilt" in the 1870s are two entirely different ships. Just as happened with Constellation in the 1850s, the Navy took an old ship, kept the name, and used repair funds to build an entirely new ship. Your top two photos show the ironclad. The bottom photo shows Galena as rebuilt, but in fact she is an entirely new ship.
 
The Galena and New Ironsides* were both built as trial competitors to Eriksonn's Monitor designed to take on CSS Virginia, but were 'standard' steam-screw ironclads with wooden hulls and took much longer to complete.
1782558155774.webp


Both were built as sloops, barque-rigged sea-ships. Since they were complete AFTER the battle of Hampton Roads, they were eventually de-rigged and used as mobile battery siege ships against Confederate coastal fortification. Galena was re-commissioned in barque-rig in March 1865 and used as a Gulf coastal blockade vessel and was damaged in the Battle of Moblile Bay. She was repaired but decommissioned later. Condemned by survey in 1870, Galena was broken up in 1872 at the Norfolk Navy Yard.
(A new Galena was commissioned in 1880)

1782557570010.webp


*New Ironsides was decommissioned in April 1865 and was destroyed by a fire on 16 December 1865
 
In all seriousness, with respect to the Galena's position at Glendale and Malvern Hill, it's visited primarily because it is the flagship; McClellan goes to consult with Rodgers, and Rodgers' flagship is the Galena.

It was in optical telegraph (semaphore) contact with Malvern Hill. We have records of many messages sent back and forth, so this seems pretty clear and unambiguous. The messages seem to have taken only a few minutes to transmit in any given case, because we have at least eleven messages sent during the time McClellan is on the Galena and he's not on board for all that long.


There is a mistranslation with regards to what the Comte du Paris said, it is a type of conjugation exclusive to French.
"Lorsqu'on à mène pendant quelques jours une vie aussi rude, l'on se sent tout dépaysé en arrivant sur un navire ou tout est propre, ou les officers ont ligne blanc et ou l'on trouve subitement un bon dîner et du bon vin."
What he says is odd is being on a ship where "you can get" a good meal with good wine, rather than saying that there actually was one that they partook from.

It is possible that McClellan actually did eat on the Galena, but to my understanding the Comte du Paris does not say that he does.



As a warship the Galena seems to have been fairly capable; she's more vulnerable than other ironclads but less vulnerable than unarmoured sloops. She duelled Drewry's Bluff and took 44 hits, of which 13 penetrated the armour, but I rather suspect that those hits would have been more damaging if she didn't have the armour, so what I wonder is if she fell victim to the "all or nothing" fallacy where armour that does not completely protect is seen as of no value.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top