Steam Engines

wausaubob

Brev. Brig. Gen'l
Member of the Month
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Location
Denver, CO
In Mark Wilson's book on the Business of Civil War, he described other applications of steam power that had nothing to do with ships on the water. By 1860 the use of steam power to operate spindles and looms was well established. But in the US the major artillery factories had steam powered cranes to handle the artillery pieces during the cooling process. The major wagon factories in Cincinnati and Philadelphia had steam powered saws to produce the lumber. In pegging and sewing shoes to produce marching boots by the millions, in the US there were steam powered machines to complete that task. With respect to producing the basics necessary for war, and getting those items to the forward depots the US had an insurmountable advantage. And that advantage was in addition to the ability to build steam sloops, ironclad steamboats, and steam transports, however many were needed, wherever they could be used.
 
After battles CSA farriers collected shoes from dead horses. No other source for premade shoes existed.

IMG_0051.jpeg

Patent drawing for horseshoe making machine.

On the other hand, the horseshoe machine patented in 1835 cranked out 3,600 an hour for the Union Army. This short article from American Farrier is an eye opener.

Link:

 
Many major newspapers on both sides were printed on steam presses. There were also steam engines for use on farms.
To get a good idea of the many applications of steam power in that era a person should search for that listing in the 1870 census. For many reasons, the 1870 census was a better depiction of the emerging capitalist economy.
 
In those days if you motorised something, that motor would be a steam engine. Most were large and heavy, so they were not applied to anything moving cross country. There were no electic motors yet and nothing that could be applied to smaller items. Most steam-powered items were fixed or large mobile items. The fastest were RR locomotives, but even they would have a hard time hitting an average of 30mph on most lines due to the terrain. They hated inclines. On most of the longer distance tracks, wood was the preferred fuel as it was more easily available. Traction engines/road locos were walking pace and required a well-made road or jetty. Fixed cranes were often steam-powered but, again, needed well-made foundations. The main use for steam at this time was for factories where power was distributed by gears and rotating shafts with chain or belt connectors. It replaced the traditional waterwheel and allowed factories to be placed away from a flowing water resource.

For most of these engines, coal was essential, as it was the most efficient fuel available, so steam power tended to develop around the sources of coal. It spread with railroads, but only within about 50 miles, depending on the terrain, the track and the locomotives used. However, wood was a reasonable alternative - provided the boiler was built to use wood.

Later, in the 1870s, they were used to power DC electrical generators, but high voltage AC generation - which was easier to send long distances through tranmission lines - was still many decades away.
 
After battles CSA farriers collected shoes from dead horses. No other source for premade shoes existed.

View attachment 550429
Patent drawing for horseshoe making machine.

On the other hand, the horseshoe machine patented in 1835 cranked out 3,600 an hour for the Union Army. This short article from American Farrier is an eye opener.

Link:

The problem with that is - there is no such animal as a standard horse. which means that mass produced shoes have to be sized and custom fitted to each hoof.
 
In those days if you motorised something, that motor would be a steam engine. Most were large and heavy, so they were not applied to anything moving cross country. There were no electic motors yet and nothing that could be applied to smaller items. Most steam-powered items were fixed or large mobile items. The fastest were RR locomotives, but even they would have a hard time hitting an average of 30mph on most lines due to the terrain. They hated inclines. On most of the longer distance tracks, wood was the preferred fuel as it was more easily available. Traction engines/road locos were walking pace and required a well-made road or jetty. Fixed cranes were often steam-powered but, again, needed well-made foundations. The main use for steam at this time was for factories where power was distributed by gears and rotating shafts with chain or belt connectors. It replaced the traditional waterwheel and allowed factories to be placed away from a flowing water resource.

For most of these engines, coal was essential, as it was the most efficient fuel available, so steam power tended to develop around the sources of coal. It spread with railroads, but only within about 50 miles, depending on the terrain, the track and the locomotives used. However, wood was a reasonable alternative - provided the boiler was built to use wood.

Later, in the 1870s, they were used to power DC electrical generators, but high voltage AC generation - which was easier to send long distances through tranmission lines - was still many decades away.
I don't know whether any American city was so equipped, but the London Hydraulic Power Company used high pressure water mains to power the London docks - cranes, winches, gates etc and to power lifts (elevators) in the buildings of the West end. The pressure was maintained by central steam pumping houses.
 
The problem with that is - there is no such animal as a standard horse. which means that mass produced shoes have to be sized and custom fitted to each hoof.

In support of your point; Burden's plant produced eight sizes of front shoes & five sizes of rear shoes. Then as now, the farrier adjusts the shoe to fit the hoof.

Link:

 
Last edited:
While the North had two arms factories, clothing factories, ammunition amd cartridge suppliers screw steamers - and tons of coal.
Had more of it, yes. Interpretation of some, South had none.

Might remember South supplied its armies for 4 years. Never ran out of arms or ammo. Most important thing was finance. Couldn't raise money. Recon why the North was so inept that it took so long to defeat the South? How many foreigners did they have to pay to fight for them. 25% of the South stayed in the Union. A large part of their Mfg capability. However Confederate States were able to adapt. 2 1/2 times the white population. All of these things contributed to a Northern victory.
 
I worked one summer for a local company that refurbished loom parts. We refurbished parts for cotton mills all over Georgia and east Alabama . The Atlanta Federal prison had a cotton mill for prisoners to work in. This was an old mill and had one large coal powered boiler that ran a steam engine. The driveshaft ran the length of the building belts going up through the ceiling and down through the floor.The whole building rocked with each revolution of the steam engine's fly wheel. Most cotton mills have tall smokestacks for their coal powered boilers. It made one heck of a racket.
 
After battles CSA farriers collected shoes from dead horses. No other source for premade shoes existed.

View attachment 550429
Patent drawing for horseshoe making machine.

On the other hand, the horseshoe machine patented in 1835 cranked out 3,600 an hour for the Union Army. This short article from American Farrier is an eye opener.

Link:

Author Wilson stated the US did not put horseshoes out to bid. There was one company that was dominant and the army ordered from them.
 
Steam engines combined heat, water and vibration. They needed constant maintenance. As the naval engineer Benjamin Isherwood observed, a steam engine that broke down frequently and needed special skilled repairs, was not very useful on a ship cruising the world's oceans. Creating a steam engine is only the first step. And with respect to steam power, the world's big cities, such as New York/Brooklyn had the advantage. Wherever there was the most work that city could attract the top engineers.
 
Author Wilson stated the US did not put horseshoes out to bid. There was one company that was dominant and the army ordered from them.

Indeed there was.

Link:

 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top