To the bad, he was a man of his time, deeply ingrained in the notion that black people were meant to be slaves. We need to get over the politically correct current view and look at these folks in the context of their times. Was what he did bad? Yep. Was he any different than millions more who took Native American land and either continued a policy of extermination or sent them off to live on poverty-stricken reservations? (Custer, Howard, Miles, Terry,Sherman, MacKenzie, Grierson, etc.) He provided for his family (very well), treated women well, and as Ole mentioned, was sort of a butt--like Patton and a few more I can mention.