- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Location
- Fremont, MI
They (we) sure don't write like they used to ! Both Sherman (I did order the book of his letters yesterday) and Lewis. A couple of things that I found particularly interesting .....
He had an opportunity to be the #2 guy in the War Department when it was pretty clear that Cameron was on his way out so he might have been Stanton. He had an opportunity to lead the Ohio Volunteers before McClellen so he might have been him. He had an opportunity to lead the forces in Missouri before Lyon and we know what happened to him .....
I came to this book after reading Castel's Decision in the West and then bios of Logan, McLernand and Porter so it's been interesting to get all of their perspectives on Sherman.
My copy is a first edition so I haven't read Simpson's input into the edition that he edited.....I'll have to find an read that. I'm only up to McPherson's death at this point. I found it interesting that Sherman (and Grant?) apparenntly made an effort to take all the heat because the expected him to be the one to do good things after the war.
He had an opportunity to be the #2 guy in the War Department when it was pretty clear that Cameron was on his way out so he might have been Stanton. He had an opportunity to lead the Ohio Volunteers before McClellen so he might have been him. He had an opportunity to lead the forces in Missouri before Lyon and we know what happened to him .....
I came to this book after reading Castel's Decision in the West and then bios of Logan, McLernand and Porter so it's been interesting to get all of their perspectives on Sherman.
My copy is a first edition so I haven't read Simpson's input into the edition that he edited.....I'll have to find an read that. I'm only up to McPherson's death at this point. I found it interesting that Sherman (and Grant?) apparenntly made an effort to take all the heat because the expected him to be the one to do good things after the war.

