Purchased a Saber this Week

Joined
May 8, 2015
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
This one has no provenance and very likely was never carried in battle, if it was carried at all, but it is gorgeous. It's a Clauberg Model 1860 presentation grade saber with gilt brass hilt, grip, mounts, and drag, and a "Damascus" blade with gold-washed etching. One side is inscribed "Never Surrender," and the other, "E. Pluribus Unum." This is the second sword I've purchased from Collectors Armoury CA, and I am very pleased with both purchases. (The "#13" in my slides is just my own collection inventory number.) My other saber, an 1863-dated Roby sword with a leather grip, has literally "been through the war," and it looks it, but that too has its own appeal.

1784995604435.webp

1784995653463.webp

1784995673897.webp

1784995694407.webp

1784995715957.webp
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is certainly is beautiful! Clauberg certainly did make some fine looking swords. My two sabers with the Massachusetts state seal etched on the blades were both done by Clauberg. One is very worn and virtually all the gold wash is now gone. Apparently the gold doesn't stand up well to constant use. My other sword, like yours, is virtually mint with strong gold wash and also some blueing on the blade, and was likely never used in the field. But neither of mine has the Damascus steel blade.
 
This one has no provenance and very likely was never carried in battle, if it was carried at all, but it is gorgeous. It's a Clauberg Model 1860 presentation grade saber with gilt brass hilt, grip, mounts, and drag, and a "Damascus" blade with gold-washed etching. One side is inscribed "Never Surrender," and the other, "E. Pluribus Unum." This is the second sword I've purchased from Collectors Armoury CA, and I am very pleased with both purchases. (The "#13" in my slides is just my own collection inventory number.) My other saber, an 1863-dated Roby sword with a leather grip, has literally "been through the war," and it looks it, but that too has its own appeal.

View attachment 585563
View attachment 585564
View attachment 585565
View attachment 585566
View attachment 585567
The sword arrived today and I am delighted with it, but I was mistaken about one thing: It's not a Model 1860, it's a Model 1840 wristbreaker with a 35" blade, a flat spine, 3/8" thick and 1.25" wide at the ricasso. I am even more delighted, as I hadn't had an example of the Model 1840 in my collection. Here is the corrected slide.

1785293662348.webp
 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
►About CivilWarTalk
►Contact the Webmaster
►Meet the Staff
►Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
►Register
►Browse Forums
►View Today's Discussions
►Search the Forum
Get Help
►FAQ
►Student Guide
►Forum Rules & Etiquette
►Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top