Providence Tool Company Markings

bayonet

2nd Lieutenant
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Anyone have a pic or in your collection of the markings on both sides of the blades of swords/sabers made by Providence Tool Company? Thanks
 
Anyone have a pic or in your collection of the markings on both sides of the blades of swords/sabers made by Providence Tool Company? Thanks
Here you go.
1705786225593.png

1705786269833.png

1705786349644.png

1705786373897.png
 
I tried to hunt down my Providence Tool Company saber with scabbard but was unsuccessful. It's around somewhere. I was able to find a relic Providence Tool Co. saber that has no grip and is missing several inches off the end of the blade. The tag attached to it indicates it was found on a battlefield around Vicksburg. The company stamp on one ricasso and the U.S. and 1862 on the other are all but illegible. There is a JM stamp on the pommel. The edge where the blade was snapped off looks weathered, so it probably lay on the battle a little while before it was collected.

IMG_6276.jpeg
IMG_6279.jpeg
IMG_6280.jpeg
IMG_6278.jpeg
IMG_6285.jpeg
IMG_6287.jpeg
 
You might find the old thread on the Providence Tool Company of interest.




IMG_0890.jpeg
 
You might note two things from the responses so far, one is the backward slant of "PROV." The other is the year, 1862. Looking at the Providence section in Thillmann's book on cavalry and artillery swords it appears that the majority of cavalry swords were delivered in 1862. Could the slanting PROV. be the adding of a company to an existing "TOOL CO." stamp? There also seems to be more than one way the fuller is stopped near the hilt.
 
You might note two things from the responses so far, one is the backward slant of "PROV." The other is the year, 1862. Looking at the Providence section in Thillmann's book on cavalry and artillery swords it appears that the majority of cavalry swords were delivered in 1862. Could the slanting PROV. be the adding of a company to an existing "TOOL CO." stamp? There also seems to be more than one way the fuller is stopped near the hilt.
Yes thanks the slant of PROV was well noted. Plus I wanted to be sure on the date since for some reason many fakes and repros are dated 1862.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top