tony_gunter
2nd Lieutenant
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Location
- Mississippi
McPherson landed at Lake Providence, scouted the terrain, and four days later said ahhhh heck naw and sent all but one company of Bissell's Engineers north to cut the river at Ashton. By early March, he reported to Grant that the canal would be viable in a week or so.
Looking at the papers in St Louis, I see reports that Bayou Macon is totally unsuitable as a route because it is too full of snags. But 1860 papers in Louisiana advertise steamboat travel as far north on Bayou Macon as Caledonia without the addition of water created by the canal carrying the floodwaters of the Mississippi. If I have the location of Caledonia correct, that's nearly as far north as Ashton. And I have an account from a wife of one of Bissel's engineers stating that the Sam Young steamed down to Lake Providence from Ashton shortly after entering Bayou Macon.
Were the Federals attempting to hide the viability of this route from the Confederates or from Federal high command?
Looking at the papers in St Louis, I see reports that Bayou Macon is totally unsuitable as a route because it is too full of snags. But 1860 papers in Louisiana advertise steamboat travel as far north on Bayou Macon as Caledonia without the addition of water created by the canal carrying the floodwaters of the Mississippi. If I have the location of Caledonia correct, that's nearly as far north as Ashton. And I have an account from a wife of one of Bissel's engineers stating that the Sam Young steamed down to Lake Providence from Ashton shortly after entering Bayou Macon.
Were the Federals attempting to hide the viability of this route from the Confederates or from Federal high command?