Pickett's Charge, failed because?

Lee's Pennsylvania incursion was prompted by a number of factors (among them seek needed food and forage, forestall Union offensives in Virginia, damage northern morale, relieve pressure at Vicksburg). Many of these wants were being achieved by Lee and his army and a clear battlefield victory over the AotP would have served as the icing on the cake, by demonstrating the strength of southern arms and the durability of an independent Confederacy. That would have made the incursion a real strategic success for the cause of the Confederacy had the ANV withdrew in triumph to Virginia, rather than in anguish and disgust.
Gotcha- but in the case of a victory, Lee still must withdraw……with a bad limp after Gettysburg. The South could ill afford such victories.
But it certainly could have wrecked Lincoln's re-election bid in '64. I guess the political ramifications may have warranted Lee's bold move.
Talking out of both sides of my mouth now- better hush!
 
but in the case of a victory, Lee still must withdraw……with a bad limp after Gettysburg. The South could ill afford such victories
An incursion (or raid) will necessarily end with the attacker returning to its safe haven after hopefully accomplishing the aims of the incursion. So a withdrawal by Lee and the ANV to Virginia after a successful engagement at Gettysburg would not be seen as an admission of defeat, but as a victorious fulfillment of the purpose of the Pennsylvania gambit. In reality, the ANV did indeed withdraw with a "bad limp" after Gettysburg because of the massive casualties it incurred and the failure to attain major goals. A speculative win by the ANV might still have resulted in large casualties, for which the south could ill afford. But that was Lee's modus operandi since the Seven Days, which left him no choice but to bear diminishing manpower at the expense of holding off northern power long enough in the hopes of achieving a political solution to attaining Confederate independence.
 
Read an article some time ago, a book too? I think. About how a large number of rebel soldiers just didn't make the charge. Stayed back, went off to the sides.
 
Read an article some time ago, a book too? I think. About how a large number of rebel soldiers just didn't make the charge. Stayed back, went off to the sides.
I hadn't heard of that before but it's perfectly believable, perhaps they started off in the charge but when they witnessed the carnage they lost hope and headed away to the sides in order to avoid the slaughter. I'm not sure if it would have even been possible to hang back, surely they would have been seen by those observing the battle!
 
I think this is an excellent point. I doubt he could have achieved a Cannae like victory, and the end result would be he bought some worthless ground he could not hold at a terrible price in casualties. Some people think it could have led to foreign recognition, but at this point that was simply not going to happen short of him taking DC or some other kind of cataclysmic event. And I think that is really the biggest flaw in Lee as a strategist.
It is funny how Cannae is in many ways seen as the victory to try for... considering that it did not in any way win the war for Hannibal.


anyway, was it actually Lee's job to think strategically like that?
I don't think so. To me Lee was just an army commander responsible for defending the CSA capital and borders.
It look to me like the main job of doing strategic planning should have been done by the war department/political leadership.
And they should then have told Lee what his orders where.

Since they failed to do so, it sort of fell to Lee to try define a strategy to win the war... without giving him the authority to carry his plan out.
 
I hadn't heard of that before but it's perfectly believable, perhaps they started off in the charge but when they witnessed the carnage they lost hope and headed away to the sides in order to avoid the slaughter. I'm not sure if it would have even been possible to hang back, surely they would have been seen by those observing the battle!

Plus heading away to the sides might get you killed even faster... some nasty fire coming to the flanks of the attack. Hanging back would have been bad for the ole 'honor'.
 
I hadn't heard of that before but it's perfectly believable, perhaps they started off in the charge but when they witnessed the carnage they lost hope and headed away to the sides in order to avoid the slaughter. I'm not sure if it would have even been possible to hang back, surely they would have been seen by those observing the battle!
I would appreciate if someone could remember this controversial theory from probably the early 2000.
 
I have just been reading some designer notes for a computer wargame discussing the effect of weather. It suggested that if it had been raining then 'the charge' may have had more chance if it was heavy rain so the approach would have suffer much less because of the effect of rain on black powder weapons.
 
I have just been reading some designer notes for a computer wargame discussing the effect of weather. It suggested that if it had been raining then 'the charge' may have had more chance if it was heavy rain so the approach would have suffer much less because of the effect of rain on black powder weapons.
Ifs and buts don't mean a thing.

The charge was doomed from the start , Poor decision making by Lee including and the fact he had nowhere near enough troops for the assault or to exploit any breakthrough.

Like Grant at cold harbour Lee presumed he could just throw bodies at a problem and he would succeed but unlike Grant Lee has seen first hand what a disaster an open field assault could be at Fredericksburg when Artillery could be used to its maximum effect.

No ifs or buts Lee messed it up his assault on the 2nd he was justified in his assault on the 3rd was not period imho.
 
Last edited:
Read an article some time ago, a book too? I think. About how a large number of rebel soldiers just didn't make the charge. Stayed back, went off to the sides.
There is some corroboration from contemporary Confederate accounts that indicate that a portion of men, particularly from Pettigrew and Trimble's Divisions, didn't advance past the Emmitsburg Road but instead went to ground in the slightly sunken road. In addition, there are accounts from Pickett's Division that they were leaking stragglers almost from the beginning. Captain Bright of Pickett's staff, wrote that when he returned to Seminary Ridge as the division was passing the Emmitsburg Road, he found scores of men loitering around in the woods along the ridge. Of course, he said that they were all North Carolinians but it's clear that they were Virginians based on where he went on the ridge.

Ryan
 
There is some corroboration from contemporary Confederate accounts that indicate that a portion of men, particularly from Pettigrew and Trimble's Divisions, didn't advance past the Emmitsburg Road but instead went to ground in the slightly sunken road. In addition, there are accounts from Pickett's Division that they were leaking stragglers almost from the beginning. Captain Bright of Pickett's staff, wrote that when he returned to Seminary Ridge as the division was passing the Emmitsburg Road, he found scores of men loitering around in the woods along the ridge. Of course, he said that they were all North Carolinians but it's clear that they were Virginians based on where he went on the ridge.

Ryan
That sounds a lot like what I read. And "why don't they come"...
 
There is some corroboration from contemporary Confederate accounts that indicate that a portion of men, particularly from Pettigrew and Trimble's Divisions, didn't advance past the Emmitsburg Road but instead went to ground in the slightly sunken road. In addition, there are accounts from Pickett's Division that they were leaking stragglers almost from the beginning. Captain Bright of Pickett's staff, wrote that when he returned to Seminary Ridge as the division was passing the Emmitsburg Road, he found scores of men loitering around in the woods along the ridge. Of course, he said that they were all North Carolinians but it's clear that they were Virginians based on where he went on the ridge.

Ryan
Again poor decision making by Lee to include many brigades that had been mauled on the 1st like Davis , Archer , Pettigrew , Brokenbrough , Scales , Their is no excuse.

Lee didn't have enough men for the assault which is the reason these tattered Brigades were included it was sheer madness imho.
 
Again poor decision making by Lee to include many brigades that had been mauled on the 1st like Davis , Archer , Pettigrew , Brokenbrough , Scales , Their is no excuse.

Lee didn't have enough men for the assault which is the reason these tattered Brigades were included it was sheer madness imho.
Agreed, Lt Col George Gordon had apparently warned picket that his men had been 'terribly cut up on the 1st and lacked the heart to go in again but regardless of his warnings the brigade was expected to attack. I think there's definitely some truth to the argument that Lee over estimated the ability of his troops to perform well given that they had already taken a beating.
 
Again poor decision making by Lee to include many brigades that had been mauled on the 1st like Davis , Archer , Pettigrew , Brokenbrough , Scales , Their is no excuse.

Lee didn't have enough men for the assault which is the reason these tattered Brigades were included it was sheer madness imho.
Closer examination of the troops selected for the assault. Heth's division was a wreck.
 
Again poor decision making by Lee to include many brigades that had been mauled on the 1st like Davis , Archer , Pettigrew , Brokenbrough , Scales , Their is no excuse.

Lee didn't have enough men for the assault which is the reason these tattered Brigades were included it was sheer madness imho.

It was a tall order for any body of troops. Even Pickett's Division, which was fresh, suffered from straggling during the advance.

Interestingly, some of Scales' men made one of the furthest advances of the left wing of the assault.

Ryan
 
Amazing the things I did not know. Didn't know that there was an author named George Rippey Stewart, who wrote a book called Earth Abides and also...drum roll please... a book on Pickett's Charge🤔
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top