Here are a few links that provide a good overview,I'm truly serious about studying up on Native American Confederates.gotta go for now.
Here are a few links that provide a good overview,
http://alexandriava.gov/historic/fortward/default.aspx?id=40164
http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/pearidge/pea-ridge-history-articles/cherokeespearidgehess.html
http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/c/ci011.html
http://www.civilwarhome.com/nativeamericans.htm
Totally lost me here. It's much simpler to be Norwegian.Oh, not all of them were! The whole list is Quesemegan, Seecock, Semack, Narragansett, Cherokee, Pamunkey, Catawba, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Etaw, Cheraw - that's dad's. Mom's is Konomihu, Okwanuchu, Shasta, Applegate Shasta, Takelma, Shoshone, Karuk, Yurok and possibly a stray Rogue River but we're not sure about him. The BIA wants you to prove blood degree back to your great-grandparents but all those tribes meant droplets except for the Karuk. Happened to have the blood degree for them. The eastern tribes did a lot of moving and getting moved and I guess my ancestors believed in being neighborly!That blood degree thingie by the government is how you get four by four Indians like me who can't join a tribe, and people who would lose their Indian blood with a paper cut as tribal members. It's a weird system!
p s
Oops...forgot the Huron and the Abnaki...
Nothing wrong with a thread on CSA Indians. At the same time we should keep in mind quite a few fought for the Union and per the books "The South Bitterly Divided" and "Civil War in the West" CSA Indians did plenty of wrong to Indians that did not want to fight for the CSA. Also many Indians defected to the Union an example is the Indians who joined the 3rd Indian Home guard. It is not a simple story. Also we should keep in mind that in no way did the CW keep both CSA forces and Union forces from killing Indians that they considered hostile.
Leftyhunter "
Good points. Just to muddy the waters up even more Of the 12k Indians who fought for the CSA how active where they? It has been said that the pro-CSA Indians in the IT where more of a nuisance and were inactive a great deal of the time. How effective where the Indians has conventional infantry? I don't know but at Pea Ridge they may of inspired the Union troops to fight harder. On the other hand CSA Hampton's Legion seems to of done well. We forgot to mention the Lumby Indians of Nc who where conscripted to build coastal fortifications and then fought during and after the CW against the local whites. I will try to do some research this weekend. This week I have a lot of work but no doubt it is has we both agree a far from simple story about Indians and the CW.In I.T., Native Americans considered the evacuation of Union forces from I.T. as abandonment--a violation of treaty terms. "Policywise", the Union did nothing to entice Native American nations/tribes/bands (https://archive.org/details/chickasawnations00malo) ... on the other hand, and to the credit of the C.S.A., the Confederacy did, as policy, encourage Native American cooperation. Marcy 12, 1861, President Davis established a Bureau of Indian Affairs to establish official relations with Indians (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_m031261.asp). In early 1861, Davis chose Albert Pike as a delegate to the tribes East of the Mississippi River. One particular treaty, with the Choctaw & Chickasaw, offered the opportunity for an entitled representative in the House of Representatives of the Confederate States of America. This was just one term, out of 64, of that particular treaty. Another interesting term would allow an Indian Nation to become a Confederated state-- if they voluntarily chose to. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_with_Choctaws_and_Chickasaws) Many Native Americans, mostly from the Five Civilized Tribes, had mixed ancestry ... which means they would have family ties to non-Indian families of the South rather than the North. Consider all these factor, out of much more that needs to be detailed, it is easy to see why the Indians mostly chose to fight on the side of the Confederacy.
In the southwest, Confederates & Apaches were in conflict, but that's not saying much when the Apaches were in conflict with all outside influences--including other tribes in that area. The Union, however, did commit one of the worse atrocities during the Civil War--the massacre at Sand Creek, Colorado Territory in '64. Black Kettle's Indian group was pro-Union, in a manner of speaking, but members were still murdered by the forces of U. S. Colonel John Chivington. I have yet to undercover U.S. policy about Indians during the Civil War but it seems the country had designed plans against the Indian (West of the Mississippi) right before the outbreak of the War--based on materials I have read.
A good number of Indians also fought for the Union--probably the best known was Ely S. Parker. I have read that roughly between 3000-6,000, more or less, served the Union ... around 12,000 or more for the Confederacy. (I am currently counting all individual Native American Civil War records found on fold3.com)
Native Americans on both sides, and the unfortunate neutrals who were caught in the middle, did commit atrocities--or had atrocities occurred against them. The story of Opothleyahola's neutral group is a sad case, but it appearts in August 1861 that Opothleyahola's group sided with the Union--the Confederacy would consider it an act of war.
Yes, it is certainly true that its not a simple story ... one I'm willing to figure out the details, even if it takes years. New information is bound to show-up and shed light on this little told story of the War.
A general thread for Native Americans during the Civil War ...
The Thomas Legion ( Confederate 69th NC ) Made up of Cherokees and Whites from the western North Carolina & eastern Tennessee mountains
http://history-sites.com/cherokee/thomasle.html
http://www.archive.org/stream/historiesofsever03clar#page/n853/mode/2up
![]()
James R. Love
Residence Jackson County NC; 27 years old.
Enlisted on 4/27/1861 as a 3rd Lieut.
On 4/27/1861 he was commissioned into "A" Co. NC 16th Infantry
He was transferred out on 10/5/1862
On 10/5/1862 he transferred into "A" Co. NC Thomas's Legion
(date and method of discharge not given)
He was listed as:
* Wounded 5/31/1862 Seven Pines, VA
Promotions:
* 1st Lieut 4/25/1862
* Capt 6/30/1862
Sources used by Historical Data Systems, Inc.:
- North Carolina Troops 1861-65, A Roster
(c) Historical Data Systems, Inc. @ www.civilwardata.com
Ah, this is nice! Love these pictures. You don't often see them.
I'm a full blood but my ancestors hit all 500 nations! I'm a member of the Karuk tribe of California. My grandfather was born in 1849, Choctaw mother, in Kentucky. Around 1864 he signed on with Forrest - his five brothers were already in his escort. They were not tribal but were wealthy horse breeders, which is how Forrest came to know the family. Some Chickasaw relations had a cotton plantation somewhere outside Memphis - some of them came on, too. There were two Oklahoma Choctaw cousins as well, who were US marshals. They'd been Choctaw Light Horse. I know the Mississippi Choctaw require you to be half to join - I inquired several years ago when I found my great-grandmother was Choctaw. I believe they also require you to speak the language? I'm always interested in that as I teach three river languages here.
The Thomas Legion ( Confederate 69th NC ) Made up of Cherokees and Whites from the western North Carolina & eastern Tennessee mountains
http://history-sites.com/cherokee/thomasle.html
http://www.archive.org/stream/historiesofsever03clar#page/n853/mode/2up