JackADriscoll
Sergeant Major
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
That big curved sword is probably my favorite edged weapon of the war but are there any stories of crews using them for anything?
is there anything cooler looking than mounted artillery?They looked pretty cool on the occasional parade...
View attachment 557186
Otherwise seemed to prefer employing them in storage while drilling, campaigning, etc.
View attachment 557188
View attachment 557189
is there anything cooler looking than mounted artillery?
I'll have to find the stores, but I remember reading a few things about artillery batteries cutting their way out of a bind.
I will try.Do please post the citations. That would be a very remarkable thing to save into my artillery folder.
Thanx.I will try.
I do believe that there's at least one in this book. I'm currently forgetting which battery of the artillery regiments was the one involved.Thanx.
I do believe that there's at least one in this book. I'm currently forgetting which battery of the artillery regiments was the one involved.
![]()
The Army of the United States
books.google.com
I, too, would like to see at least one citation that doesn't include words like likely, probably, or possibly. For several reasons (misuse of gov't property, availability of fascine knives and other pioneer tools, etc.), I am having trouble accepting the fact that the foot artillery sword was used to cut brush. It's possible, but ...
It's unfortunate that Thillman in Civil War Army Swords (p.37), asserts without reference that "the sword blade provided a useful weapon and campaign tool". Without details, the statement not only begs the questions of where, when, and by whom, but also perpetuates what may be a falsehood.
Sometimes they used the swords to chop down dry weeds near their guns, so that a fire was not started when they went into action.That big curved sword is probably my favorite edged weapon of the war but are there any stories of crews using them for anything?
The Sgt. has the Artillery Sword hanging from the proper leather waist belt. The frog being integral with the belt, hanged from rings incorporated in the belt design. Some Confederate saber belts also used rings that were not sewn and riveted to the belt but were an interruption of the leather belt. I imagine the saber straps hanged from the rings similar to how the Artillery Sword Frog hangs from open rings. Interesting pieces of equipment.For those who are unfamiliar with artillery sabers & swords.
View attachment 565902
In this illustration the officer carries a light artillery saber & the sergeant has an an 1832 model artillery sword hanging from his belt. The white gaiters, brass shoulder scales, white traps & artillery sword are examples of garrison / militia gee-gaws that did not survive the first wartime field service.
Light Artillery Saber
View attachment 565900
Link to detailed photos & description;
Artillery Sword
View attachment 565901
The Model 1832 Artillery Sword is a copy of the Napoleonic era blade. It looks like a Roman Gladius. However, that is where the similarities end.
The thick heavy wrist busting blade with a cast brass handle / guard is actually a machete. It was made for chopping brush, not people.
I have one & can testify to the fact that nobody would willingly have it hanging on their belt if they could avoid it. The thing is clunky in the extreme. They disappear from photos very quickly.
. The sword is not the saber. Being that the artillery short sword was designed for camp usage, it is not a stretch to think artillery crews used it for that purpose. Who made all those fascines and gabions, and fortification parts that used saplings and smaller trees. With help of axes, men working together could clear fields of fire for the wood reinforced earthworks. And a line of sharpened stakes angled outward with abatis of various sizes trees with the branch ends sharpened and chained together pointing downrange. I don't see sabers taking on all that duty. Hatchets, axes, bowie knives, short swords, and sabers probably all came together when needed to be pressed into service.I, too, would like to see at least one citation that doesn't include words like likely, probably, or possibly. For several reasons (misuse of gov't property, availability of fascine knives and other pioneer tools, etc.), I am having trouble accepting the fact that the foot artillery sword was used to cut brush. It's possible, but ...
It's unfortunate that Thillman in Civil War Army Swords (p.37), asserts without reference that "the sword blade provided a useful weapon and campaign tool". Without details, the statement not only begs the questions of where, when, and by whom, but also perpetuates what may be a falsehood.