McClellan continues the War

Joined
Aug 10, 2021
Hey folks. This is something I've been thinking about for a while now and so I figured I'd put it out there for you all.

There has been plenty of what ifs about how if the 1864 campaigns went worse for the Union, McClellan might have won and he would have negotiated with the Confederates like the Copperheads wanted and allowed the South to achieve their independence.

What I'd like to hear your thoughts on is this. What if the campaigns of 1864 went bad enough for the Union for McClellan to win the '64 election, only for McClellan to decide to continue to prosecute the war? How might he have shaken things up? Would he have replaced certain commanders? How might his strategic vision have differed from what happened in reality?

Something else I'd love to hear is who you guys think McClellan might have chosen for his cabinet and if those choices might have even been accepted by what would have undoubtedly been a hostile, Republican, Congress.

Anyway, thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing your various thoughts as this is something I've been pondering a lot lately.
 
Hey folks. This is something I've been thinking about for a while now and so I figured I'd put it out there for you all.

There has been plenty of what ifs about how if the 1864 campaigns went worse for the Union, McClellan might have won and he would have negotiated with the Confederates like the Copperheads wanted and allowed the South to achieve their independence.

What I'd like to hear your thoughts on is this. What if the campaigns of 1864 went bad enough for the Union for McClellan to win the '64 election, only for McClellan to decide to continue to prosecute the war? How might he have shaken things up? Would he have replaced certain commanders? How might his strategic vision have differed from what happened in reality?

Something else I'd love to hear is who you guys think McClellan might have chosen for his cabinet and if those choices might have even been accepted by what would have undoubtedly been a hostile, Republican, Congress.

Anyway, thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing your various thoughts as this is something I've been pondering a lot lately.
Mac would've eased on emancipation, and there would've probably been a tighter leash on Sheridan and Sherman's policy.

I don't know his opinions on Grant, but he probably would've been kept. As for his cabinet, I doubt it would've been full of Copperheads, as people try to say about him. He was no traitor.
 
From the papers:

1693599255981.png

1693599337178.png

1693599371498.png


1693599424943.png

1693599458383.png

1693599558471.png

1693599625642.png

1693599686036.png

1693599743677.png

1693599816515.png


Boston Post, Sept. 12, '64.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top