Lee's Forgotten Corps Commander

I thought I'd make a thread asking what people's opinions on Richard Anderson are. He was a very competent divisional commander from all I've read, but never showed true greatness as a corps commander. He is seemingly left out of most discussions regarding Lee's lieutenants.

Wasn't it General Dick Anderson who chased Grant through the Wilderness by cutting a road for artillery through the trees? I'm fairly certain he succeeded and did a good job keeping the AoTP occupied rather than moving forward unopposed. Seems like he did a good job.

Also, didn't General Anderson play a prominent role in the retreat of the AoNV during the Appomattox campaign?

My impression is that maybe Anderson was just more concerned about doing a good job than he was about engaging in rivalries to make himself look better at the expense of others. I can't recall anybody accusing him of ambitiously gunning for a higher/independent command. I think that he was a bit slow moving, but otherwise dependable.

Sometimes the absence of excessive notierity (good or bad) can be a good thing. I think General Anderson fits that bill.

There's most likely more to him than that, but that is my general impression of Anderson.
 
Wasn't it General Dick Anderson who chased Grant through the Wilderness by cutting a road for artillery through the trees? I'm fairly certain he succeeded and did a good job keeping the AoTP occupied rather than moving forward unopposed. Seems like he did a good job.

Also, didn't General Anderson play a prominent role in the retreat of the AoNV during the Appomattox campaign?

My impression is that maybe Anderson was just more concerned about doing a good job than he was about engaging in rivalries to make himself look better at the expense of others. I can't recall anybody accusing him of ambitiously gunning for a higher/independent command. I think that he was a bit slow moving, but otherwise dependable.

Sometimes the absence of excessive notierity (good or bad) can be a good thing. I think General Anderson fits that bill.

There's most likely more to him than that, but that is my general impression of Anderson.
Anderson always struck me as the quiet kid. You never hear much about him. He was an extremely effective divisional commander, though that is often left out. I think the only blemish of his career is Saylor's Creek.
 
Anderson always struck me as the quiet kid. You never hear much about him. He was an extremely effective divisional commander, though that is often left out. I think the only blemish of his career is Saylor's Creek.

I agree 👍.

He also apparently shared a close resemblance to General Lee, so that must have, at least, helped his career a LITTLE bit 😀
 
I do think Anderson was a solid commander overall but his division's performance at Gettysburg was not good. The coordination with Longstreet's Corps on Day 2 was poor with only 3 of his 5 brigades fully participating in the attack. Much of the fault was at a higher level with poor coordination between Longstreet and A.P. Hill whose corps Anderson's Div. had recently been reassigned to.

It has also been speculated that Anderson's 3 hour delay in getting his division to the front on Day 1 was critical in the ANV's inability to decisively follow up on their early success.
 
Last edited:
Richard Anderson may have participated in the first amphibious landing of the Civil War in the Battle of Santa Rosa fought in Florida in October 1862. His 1,200 man brigade crossed from the mainland to an island in steamers and attacked a Union encampment, destroyed the camp and attempted to lure the defenders of Fort Pickens to attack a defensive position he had established. Anderson was severely wounded in the arm during the attack. His performance boosted his reputation and his was promoted to divisional command in early 1862. His division fought well at Seven Pines where he earned the nickname Fighting Dick. He commanded the division holding the Bloody Lane at Antietam and Anderson was again wounded in the thigh and ankle. His removal from the field is one reason Bloody Lane was eventually overrun.

At Gettysburg he did not coordinate his brigades well during the attack on July 2nd. One brigade, Mahone's, did not even enter the fight. He fought well again in the battles of 1864 and at Saylor's Creek in April 1865 his division along with what was left of Pickett's was shattered as a fighting force when it was caught in a bad spot straddling a creek and routed by Union cavalry and infantry. Anderson was a good division commander who is overlooked compared to some of the more famous names in the Army of Northern Virginia.
 
Last edited:
Anderson was a better than average division commander but Gettysburg is a huge black mark on his record. Not only did he not coordinate with other commanders, he didn't even watch his division's advance and attack. Ambrose Wright sent back multiple aides to ask for support and found Anderson sitting on a log on the backside of Seminary Ridge, joking with his staff. That is nearly an unforgivable lapse in judgment for an otherwise able officer. As a corps commander after Longstreet's wounding, he did pretty well, getting his men on the road early and winning the race to Spotsylvania.

Ryan
 
As already noted, Anderson's major failing was day 2 at Gettysburg when portions of his division floundered in carrying out the en echelon attack against the Union line. (Although much of that failure can also be attributed to poor intelligence and oversight by both Lee and AP Hill). Conversely, Anderson had until then a generally good record as a division commander, and particularly during the furious Confederate counterattack at Chancellorsville on May 3rd. So despite Gettysburg, Anderson was a solid choice to take over command of the First Corps after Longstreet's wounding in the Wilderness. That seemed a smart move, as Anderson marched his corps expeditiously towards Spotsylvania Courthouse, thereby beating Grant to the important crossroads. Furthermore, his leadership throughout the Overland Campaign did not generate the type of opprobrium that Lee visited on the other corps commanders, Ewell and AP Hill. Anderson is unfortunately associated with the disaster at Saylor's Creek, although it's hard to discern what other recourse was open to the ANV on its last futile mission. Anderson was a modest, low-key commander, which sometimes was thought of as him being low-energy, a trait that did not sit well with the aggressive Lee and probably contributed to his lower historical profile.
 
"Fighting Dick" Anderson, isn't He the one who temporarily took over the 1st Corps for the wounded Gen. Longstreet? Lee must have seen something in him or was it just his seniority in rank that got him the job?
He did take over for the wounded Longstreet.

Lee actually seriously considered him for corps command in the spring of 1863 and probably would have tapped him if Ewell could not have taken the field. As it is, it worked out well since he was the only officer with division experience in the newly created Third Corps.

McLaws had rank on Anderson but Chancellorsville had shaken Lee's faith in McLaws and he was never really considered for promotion.

Ryan
 
"Fighting Dick" Anderson, isn't He the one who temporarily took over the 1st Corps for the wounded Gen. Longstreet? Lee must have seen something in him or was it just his seniority in rank that got him the job?
Lee most certainly saw something in Anderson, late in the war he was given the 4th Corps Command of the ANV, that was his first and last permanent appointment as a corps commander.
 
Anderson missed Appomattox by one day. His command was wiped out at Saylor's Creek so he became a commander without any command. Lee sent him home.Or is that an oversimplification?
I didn't know that Lee actually sent him home. I always assumed that at this point the ANV was falling apart and certain folks and commands were either captured or melted away.
 
Anderson always struck me as the quiet kid. You never hear much about him. He was an extremely effective divisional commander, though that is often left out. I think the only blemish of his career is Saylor's Creek.
1694106374688.png
 
Anderson missed Appomattox by one day. His command was wiped out at Saylor's Creek so he became a commander without any command. Lee sent him home.Or is that an oversimplification?
I do believe that is correct, although I have heard that he may have still been with the army and surrendered with it at Appomattox, what he was actually doing in that time is unclear, same with Bushrod Johnson.
 
I do believe that is correct, although I have heard that he may have still been with the army and surrendered with it at Appomattox, what he was actually doing in that time is unclear, same with Bushrod Johnson.

Gen. Anderson noted:

1694110302367.png

1694110329040.png


Anderson's early biographer C.I. Walker noted:
1694110427346.png


The same claims Gen. Anderson was on his way to join Johnston's army in North Carolina when he learned it too had surrendered, and he returned home...
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top