HF Jack Hinson Novel

Historical-Fiction
it was never reported in the ORN
So I'm the Captain of a Union gunboat and will write a detailed report about an old man on the riverbank capturing my boat single-handed, or my Commanding Officer will write such a report. :bounce::dance::dance::frantic: I seriously doubt every incident during the war made it to the OR.
 
Last edited:
So I'm the Captain of a Union gunboat and will write a detailed report about an old man on the riverbank capturing my boat single-handed, or my Commanding Officer will write such a report. :bounce::dance::dance::frantic: I seriously doubt every incident during the war made it to the OR.
So this is another one of those claims that just because there is no evidence, doesn't mean it wasn't true.

This is not how History works. If Hinson had actually been terrorizing Union gunboats, or Union troops, there would have been evidence.

And if Hinson actually took a shot at a gunboat, he probably heard a loud "tink!" as the bullet hit the side, and then ran home to carve another notch.
 
Kentucky Historical Society recognizes the Sniper. Department of State of Kentucky.

 
Kentucky Historical Society recognizes the Sniper. Department of State of Kentucky.

Please find quote by me or anyone else stating that Jack Hinson didn't exist or never sniped anybody.

q=tbn:ANd9GcQ3r_BA6miULtIdxTcuuGcjTEiAt21nJrI9lg&s.jpg
 
So this is another one of those claims that just because there is no evidence, doesn't mean it wasn't true.

This is not how History works. If Hinson had actually been terrorizing Union gunboats, or Union troops, there would have been evidence.

And if Hinson actually took a shot at a gunboat, he probably heard a loud "tink!" as the bullet hit the side, and then ran home to carve another notch.
I went through the LOC newspapers and found one reference to a John Hinson in Tennessee, and it had to do with chancery court.

Obviously his activities were not reportable.


Screenshot 2025-01-30 161237.png
 
Anybody familiar with WWII knows that pilots routinely claimed more kills than were actually verified. If Hinson is claiming kills from a distance of a half mile on boats we have a similar problem. It's not like his retriever was bringing them back to him.
I read the McKenney book in November and I recall some part of him saying Jack "waited" to see if the guy was dead (I couldn't find it, but stuff about notches I did find were on pages 277 and 292-293). Of course, the victim of a nonlethal gunshot wound doesn't automatically get up and treat his wound like a cut. In other words, how do we know they were dead?

I still don't understand how stopping at 36 automatically means he killed more and lost count. An honest person would say he shot 36.

Hinson's notches:

G0523-NOTCH-3.jpg
 
Please find quote by me or anyone else stating that Jack Hinson didn't exist or never sniped anybody.

View attachment 537071
Read the thread you posted! You said he didn't 36. You said none were in the ORs.

Posting a Historical marker about a subject you posted is "Stawman Argument"? Others have stated the whole story is a Myth. Guess the Kentucky Historical Society is "Lost Cause"? LOL
 
Read the thread you posted! You said he didn't 36. You said none were in the ORs.

Posting a Historical marker about a subject you posted is "Stawman Argument"? Others have stated the whole story is a Myth. Guess the Kentucky Historical Society is "Lost Cause"? LOL
Clearly I said he at least shot or killed 36 (I erroneously said 37).


Screenshot 2025-01-30 163841.png


Plus I posted a claim saying he killed 36, saying it was reasonable.


Screenshot 2025-01-30 164041.png


You need to go back to school to learn reading comprehension.

Your strawman was saying that I and others denied Jack Hinson killed anyone. No one ever said that. And I never said anything against the KHS. They said 36, not the 100 you and others are pumping.
 
Considering the backflips to defend the Hinson legend, need I remind anyone that the source, book by Tom McKenney, is full of made-up stuff? He has details he could not possibly have known, mostly in the last few chapters set during the War. How does he know what Jack did, or ate, or thought, or felt, or who he shot, or how he did it, or--in some cases--what he said? He was writing fiction for sixty pages, not counting when he did it elsewhere in the book. Anyone interested in honest history would never have done that.
 
Do you know what his "research" was? There's a CWT member who has met the author and discussed his "research" with him. That member has posted about the "research". Let's just say that if he spent 15 years doing that level of research he's in the wrong line of work.
You're going to rely on one of the most biased members on here to discount someone else. Pretty Rich.
 
Do you know what his "research" was? There's a CWT member who has met the author and discussed his "research" with him. That member has posted about the "research". Let's just say that if he spent 15 years doing that level of research he's in the wrong line of work.
Family folklore is not infallible. There's a legend on my mother's side about a Union colonel I have found no evidence of, so it's probably not true. I have not written a book on it.

Remember how Alex Haley made all that money off Roots and it turned out almost everything about Kunta Kinte was a lie? Haley truly believed it because he wanted to.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top