Jack Hinson, One Man War, great book

fwb35

Private
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Review by:

Robert B. Loring

"Jack Hinson's One-Man War," written by Lieutenant Colonel Tom C. McKenney, USMC (Ret), is the incredible story of a Southern civilian sniper operating during the American Civil War. Masterfully told, but difficult to research, LtCol McKenney has successfully brought to light this poignant tale of a grief-stricken man's need for revenge.

Jack Hinson, who was approaching 60 years old, was a successful farmer near the Tennessee-Kentucky border and a devoted family man. He was known as one of that area's leading citizens, until the "dogs of war" came calling. At first, and as did many farmers of that tumultuous period, Hinson attempted to stay neutral.

In early winter 1862, Ulysses S. Grant brought his gunboat-supported army to the walls of Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River. During the following battle Hinson road the lines and offered his eyewitness intelligence to both armies, and one to Grant himself. However, his slim-to-none hopes of staying neutral would abruptly change.

Like many other communities throughout the contested South, the times of regular combat quickly turned into irregular guerrilla warfare. Attracting semi-military forces and countless freebooters, the area residents witnessed innumerable acts of inhuman cruelty and injustice. Mayhem reigned upon the families living in this once peaceful and prosperous land.

On one horrific day a Union cavalry troop appeared at the Hinsons' door. They had captured two of Jack's boys. The boys, caught with hunting rifles, had been taken for suspected guerrillas and were summarily executed. Identified as Jack's sons, the patrol's lieutenant ordered his sergeant to impale the boys' decapitated heads on the Hinsons' front gateposts.

After the family buried their children's remains, Hinson swiftly turned his attention to exacting terrible vengeance. Hinson freed his slaves, moved his family west, and carefully oversaw the manufacture of a specially crafted sniper rifle. Certain that his surviving family was safe, he initiated his highly personalized war of retribution. McKenney writes, "Whatever the details, the Federals had sown the wind, and for the rest of the war, they would reap the whirlwind."
Hidden deep in Hinson's Scottish heritage resided the impulse for blood and retribution. The first person Hinson hunted down was the hated Union lieutenant; his second kill was the sergeant who seemed to take delight in impaling the boys' heads on the family's gateposts.

Moving freely throughout the wooded hills, Hinson continued his unique brand of warfare. He set up a camp at the base of what is now known as "Jack's Ridge," overlooking the northern flowing Tennessee River. There, at a branch known as Towhead Chute, the Union boats plowed upstream against the current. There, presenting a near stationary target, Hinson shot the boats' captains or other officers. As time passed and his killing reputation grew, he was hunted by the local army units and a combined Marine/Navy amphibious force.

In one truly remarkable moment in naval military history, the captain of a transport loaded with armed soldiers hove to and attempted to surrender. Thinking he'd been accosted by a swarm of Rebels, the captain beached his boat and rapidly struck his colors. Alone, with no infantry support, Hinson reluctantly passed on the offer and quietly faded into the countryside.

The author writes, "It was the only time in recorded history that a fully armed naval vessel with embarked combat troops ever surrendered to one man, and it was probably the shortest period of military confinement after being captured in combat."

Late in the war, Jack acted as a guide for General Nathan Bedford Forrest's operations in Tennessee and Kentucky. The author estimates that Hinson, who survived the war, had killed nearly 100 individuals, including some pro-Southern renegades who plagued his neighbor. After the war, Hinson presented his trusty sniper rifle to GEN Forrest. The reader will note that the rifle's "chain of possession" is carefully recorded in the appendix of the book.

McKenney spent 15 years researching the legend surrounding Jack Hinson's unique war experiences. His research was difficult because Hinson's surviving family was, at first, afraid of reprisal, while later descendants wished not to be remembered as being related to a bushwhacker. The book is a joy to read; whether you're an old military trained scout sniper, or a hard-charging Civil War enthusiast, you'll be captivated at this skillfully crafted literary masterpiece.


In this new biography, Jack Hinson's One Man War (Pelican Publishing, 2009), Lt. Col. Tom C. McKenney masterfully recounts Hinson's extraordinary feats as a lone Confederate sniper.

I just finished this book, is a great read.
 
Last edited:
Unattributed quote deleted by moderator jgoodguy


In this new biography, Jack Hinson's One Man War (Pelican Publishing, 2009), Lt. Col. Tom C. McKenney masterfully recounts Hinson's extraordinary feats as a lone Confederate sniper.

I just finished this book, is a great read.
Absolutely fascinating! GREAT post! What a story! Thank you! (...and who could blame him? His sons...)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a book in my kindle that may be the same one you are referring to. Fascinating read. Although Hinson extracted his share of revenge he suffered terribly losing his sons, his house, and land not to mention his family's hardships and grief but they stuck together and survived the war. My less than perfect memory says he had one son who was a very active Confederate guerilla that didn't survive the war and another that left home and enlisted in the ANV who did. I also liked the story of what became of Jack's rifle. Jack Hinson never enlisted in the Confederate Armed forces and he actually met and liked General Grant early in the war.

I feel that Hinson's greatest joy was acting as a guide for General Forrest and being there for Johnsonville where the General dealt massive destruction to the Federals and their supply dump on terra firma and ships on the water. I have no memory of another Confederate cavalry leader that captured and destroyed gun ships and or supply vessels. Jack was a driven man and a stone cold killer but unlike the Federals he never mutilated the bodies of his victims. After seeing this thread I may read that book a second time.
 
Unattributed quote deleted by moderator jgoodguy.

In this new biography, Jack Hinson's One Man War (Pelican Publishing, 2009), Lt. Col. Tom C. McKenney masterfully recounts Hinson's extraordinary feats as a lone Confederate sniper.

I just finished this book, is a great read.

It is indeed, I was so impressed that I presented a program based on the book to a local SCV camp about a year or so ago.
 
I haven't read the book but it sounds like a fascinating story. I can't help but think about his mindset- the initial quiet and conservative man- who didn't even want war or secession as described in the book jacket, the cold-blooded revenge, and the equally cold-blooded tragedies that happened that fueled the cold blooded revenge. It's so... unbelievable what war does to people- I guess this is one more story of someone's transformation. It must have been unbelievably hard for the author to find research- he sounds like even back in his day Jack Hinson was shrouded in mystery. What a remarkable man.
 
I really enjoy mysteries--and this story has more than it's share! I had no idea...I don't have children, but if someone hurt my sweet Bonny, I'd.....well, I don't blame Hinson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
What I found so interesting was he was a friend of Gen Grant, and that Grant had even been a guest in his home, he also had done some scouting for Union troops before they murdered and decapitated two of his sons.
 
Last edited:
What I found so interesting was he was a friend of Gen Grant, and that Grant had even been a guest in his home, he also had done some scouting for Union troops before they murdered two of his sons.
Really? WOW! "Blood runs thicker..." and...nice post!
 
Last edited:
What I found so interesting was he was a friend of Gen Grant, and that Grant had even been a guest in his home, he also had done some scouting for Union troops before they murdered and decapitated two of his sons.

How interesting! Did Grant know about what the Union troops had done- decapitating and putting on pikes?
 
How interesting! Did Grant know about what the Union troops had done- decapitating and putting on pikes?

hanna that question has been asked before. I don't believe Grant was in the area when Federal troops captured Jack Hinson's two sons who were hunting at the time hence the rifles. They were not uniformed Confederates nor were any of Jack Hinson's sons Confederates at that time. Grant was busy making his way to Vicksburg via Shiloh or Southern Tennessee if my less than perfect memory serves. Jack's first victims were the Federals who murdered and mutilated his sons.

Had he known I feel confident saying Grant "would not" have approved the way the Hinson family was treated but this was early in the war and General Grant's plate was quite full at the time. Grant was basically on his way up but he was not the commander of all Federal Armies in the field in all theatres like he was when he came East in "64."Atrocities were committed by both sides especially where Guerilla operations made up most of the fighting. One side sees innocents and or civilians attacked, people killed, homes and farms burned and reprisal followed outrage back and forth much like perpetual motion.






 
What was actually done under the orders of a commissioned Union officer was, the boys were tied to a tree, shot, then their bodies dragged thru the streets of their town, then taken to the families home where the entire family watched them place their decapitated heads on the gate posts in front of their house. The soldiers then wanted to take Mr Hinson but the family doctor who was there at the time persuaded the Union officer not to.

Its a great book that has much detail in it as to what was done to the civilians in that area of Tennessee. What is an even greater feat is how many Union soldiers were trying to hunt Mr Hinson down and never could, the reason the story was kept quiet for so many years is the family was afraid of retribution after the war.
 
How interesting! Did Grant know about what the Union troops had done- decapitating and putting on pikes?

OK now I will read my copy of the book after I finish the one I am reading now. I do not remember reading the Federals put the Hinson boy's heads on pikes but on the fence facing their home if my less than perfect memory serves. Later on Jack freed his slaves even giving his house to them as he nor his family could stay there any longer because the Federals were hunting him relentlessly. That didn't matter the Federals torched the home anyway despite the pleas and papers produced by the newly freed former slaves. I do believe they spared the barns though.
 
OK now I will read my copy of the book after I finish the one I am reading now. I do not remember reading the Federals put the Hinson boy's heads on pikes but on the fence facing their home if my less than perfect memory serves. Later on Jack freed his slaves even giving his house to them as he nor his family could stay there any longer because the Federals were hunting him relentlessly. That didn't matter the Federals torched the home anyway despite the pleas and papers produced by the newly freed former slaves. I do believe they spared the barns though.

There is even a sketch in my book showing the Union officer at the door and his troops behind him placing the boys heads on the gate posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
There is even a sketch in my book showing the Union officer at the door and his troops behind him placing the boys heads on the gate posts.

Hmmm let me check something. My book is Jack Hinson's One-Man-War by Tom C. McKenny. the jacket displays a man firing from an elevated position on a steam powered vessel on a waterway below him. It also says A Civil War Sniper. I don't believe the term sniper was used in the ACW.
 
Yes it is the same book I just didn't remember the illustration. I am going to read it the second time in the near future.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top