Kelly408
Private
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
- Location
- Columbia, SC
I thought I once, and only once, read that some canister was fused. I can't find anything on the internet that discusses it. Did I misunderstand what I read?
Right, because a rifle has very low windage (thus why it engages with the rifling) and even a smoothbore doesn't have very high windage. Cutting the fuze to 1/4 second would mean that the projectile would make it, what, well over a hundred feet away before exploding?Caseshot fired without a fuse doesn't burst in the barrel. It bursts ca. 20 yds downrange as the flame doesn't reach the bursting charge until after it has left the muzzle. The fuses were ignited be the flame of the main charge coming around the round after it left the barrel.
A round projectile that ended up with the fuze or fuze hole facing backwards would be ignited in the barrel.
Premature ignition was often due to friction between the rough inside of a projectile & the powder as it spun through a rifled bore. Coating it with 'asphaltium' I.e., naturally occurring asphalt solved the problem.Right, because a rifle has very low windage (thus why it engages with the rifling) and even a smoothbore doesn't have very high windage. Cutting the fuze to 1/4 second would mean that the projectile would make it, what, well over a hundred feet away before exploding?
I actually wonder if the cases of premature bursting inside the barrel of the weapon were largely the projectile being loaded improperly. A round projectile that ended up with the fuze or fuze hole facing backwards would be ignited in the barrel.
I know such an effect was actually used in the first armour piercing shells, the "Palliser" shells.Premature ignition was often due to friction between the rough inside of a projectile & the powder as it spun through a rifled bore. Coating it with 'asphaltium' I.e., naturally occurring asphalt.
I know such an effect was actually used in the first armour piercing shells, the "Palliser" shells.
Huh, there you go then. Fair enough.
If the round had been loaded backwards, the cannon could not have been fired. A smoothbore round & the sabot would have been beneath the vent & the gun would not have fired. Number three would have immediately known that the powder bag had not been pierced & the round would have been pulled. If by some bizarrely incompetent #3 happenstance the round had been ignited, nothing good could have come of it.Right, because a rifle has very low windage (thus why it engages with the rifling) and even a smoothbore doesn't have very high windage. Cutting the fuze to 1/4 second would mean that the projectile would make it, what, well over a hundred feet away before exploding?
I actually wonder if the cases of premature bursting inside the barrel of the weapon were largely the projectile being loaded improperly. A round projectile that ended up with the fuze or fuze hole facing backwards would be ignited in the barrel.
Perhaps it does, but then again if contemporary Civil War gunners used it in an emergency...Just out of curiosity, I referred the firing case shot without fuze idea to folks I know who have extensive live fire experience. To a man & woman it sounds absolutely crazy to them. I see no reason to disagree with them.
Just out of curiosity, I referred the firing case shot without fuze idea to folks I know who have extensive live fire experience. To a man & woman it sounds absolutely crazy to them. I see no reason to disagree with them.
Live firing black powder cannons then & now carries the same risks. Nobody who has ever loaded a fused round into a cannon & pulled the lanyard will tell you otherwise. Gotta admit, counting the seconds until the sharp POCK! In the sky is pretty cool.Probably does, but they're not engaged in combat are they?