The commander at Ft. Henry was tasked with blocking union penetration of the Tennessee river when forced to evacuate the Fort he took his command to Ft Donelson.
Question why was this done. If his assignment was blocking transit up the river, should he not have fallen back to the next viable defensive position on the Tennessee river.
His assignment was a vital one as allowing unimpeded penetration of the river would allow union forces to go deep into the confederate heartland.
Were there orders if the fort fell or orders issued after it fell and were they carried out.
Or is this a case of no orders.
Who is responsible for the uncovering of the Tennessee river the Ft. Henry commander or the Department commander.
Question why was this done. If his assignment was blocking transit up the river, should he not have fallen back to the next viable defensive position on the Tennessee river.
His assignment was a vital one as allowing unimpeded penetration of the river would allow union forces to go deep into the confederate heartland.
Were there orders if the fort fell or orders issued after it fell and were they carried out.
Or is this a case of no orders.
Who is responsible for the uncovering of the Tennessee river the Ft. Henry commander or the Department commander.