Barefoot ladies?

Good question about shoes. When the newly enlisted soldiers received their uniforms, they would have received the Army shoes. Presumably they might have sent their shoes back home with their other civilian clothes?

A lot depends on whether you're Union or Confederate. Assuming the farm wife and daughters were able-bodied enough and/or had the machinery to do farm work, Northern farms prospered during the war. (If they didn't, the women often ended up in the local poorhouse.) Mary Livermore, in her My Story of the War, talks about seeing women driving reapers and mowers in the fields as she traveled through the Midwest getting support for the Sanitary Commission. She also describes lots of farm women bringing in produce to donate to the big Chicago Sanitary Fair. In the Confederacy, it was a different story, especially for those living in war zones where everything was devastated and many women became refugees, as described in @Brendan's post above.

Many farm families made their own shoes, since they already had the raw material in the form of animal hides. So your farm girl may have had a pair of homemade shoes for farm work and a nicer pair (probably bought used from a peddler) for church and social events. There are lots of instances of women wearing men's shoes if they could find them in a smaller size. On a ghoulish note, in war zones, there was a lot of robbing of dead bodies after battles. (I'd rather not contemplate that one.)

Here are a few of the modern historical sources I've read:

Judith Giesberg, Army at Home: Women and the Civil War on the Northern Home Front. Especially confronts the poverty issue.

Judith Giesberg, Civil War Sisterhood: The U. S. Sanitary Commission and Women's Politics in Transition.

Nina Silber, Daughters of the Union: Northern Women Fight the Civil War.

While I've avoided the Confederacy, being a Union person, I have read that wonderful work on Southern women, Drew Gilpin Faust's Mothers of Invention: Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War.

The notes and bibliographies of these works are a great source for CW-era diaries, the best way to find out how women coped with the war. My impression, which may be incorrect, is that there are lots more existing diaries of Southern women than Northern. Diaries still keep popping up as people clean out their attics. Many out-of-print works are now available to read online.

My favorite diary is still Rachel Cormany's, in The Cormany Diaries: A Northern Family in the Civil War, ed. James C. Mohr. Left at home after her husband's enlistment with their baby daughter in Chambersburg, PA, ostensibly with her husband's family (who weren't much help), Rachel managed to survive by doing sewing and on what her husband could send her (much augmented when he became a commissioned officer in 1864). She was a college graduate from a coeducational university, highly unusual in those days. Also, Chambersburg was not exactly the safest place around since several Confederate invasions went through there.
 
Last edited:
I guess you can call and ask about the rules for footwear and it just may depend on the venue … Google barefoot and CW Reenactment under images and there are plenty. Being "authentic" is always the rule so maybe you can just be restricted from different areas if they do allow you to go barefoot. I'll be at a few more this summer and now you got me keeping my eye out for any! I will definitely be jealous because of my riding boots under all my numerous petticoats soaking wet as usual. :running: LOL
 
A lot depends on whether you're Union or Confederate. Assuming the farm wife and daughters were able-bodied enough and/or had the machinery to do farm work, Northern farms prospered during the war. (If they didn't, the women often ended up in the local poorhouse.)

This is where I'm coming from, though I portray a girl from a split family in Indiana. Not too shabby, not too high brow either. So I have boots and three dresses...but they don't fit as well as they ought. Working on that. :)
 
When your men been stealing my hogs:
20129v.jpg


Alfred R. Waud, 1863.
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/civwar/item/2004660977/
 
I've read a number of first person accounts from Union soldiers reflecting on the conditions of poor Southerners, and the lack of shoes is frequently mentioned, both among children and women, black and white. Here's one amazing account of a refugee camp for displaced Southerners in Stevenson, AL:

Our government established extensive camps for these war-stricken Southerners.

Curious to see these people I spent a day in camp at Stevenson. I saw hundreds of tall, gaunt, frouzy-headed, snuff-dipping, pipe-smoking, unclean women. Some were clad in home-spun stuffs, others in calico, others in bagging. Many of them were unshod. There were hundreds and hundreds of vermin-infested and supremely dirty children in the camp. Some families lived in tents, some in flimsy barracks. All lived in discomfort. All drew rations from the government. All were utterly poor. It seemed that they were too poor to ever again get a start in life. Haggard, wind- and sun-and storm-burnt women, their gaunt forms showing plainly through their rags, sat, or lolled, or stood in groups, talking drawlingly. Their features were as expressionless as wood, their eyes lustreless. I talked to many of these women. All told stories of murder, of arson, of blood-curdling scenes. One, gray-eyed, bony, square-jawed, barefooted, forty years old, clad in a dirty, ragged, homespun dress, sat on a log outside of a tent sucking a corn-cob pipe. Her tow-headed children played around her. She told me that before the war she and her husband owned a mountain farm, where they lived in comfort ; that they owned horses, cattle, and pigs, and raised plenty of
corn and tobacco. One day her husband, who was a Union man, was shot dead as he stood by her side in the door of their house. She buried him in a grave she dug herself. She and her children tended the crops. These were burned shortly after they gathered them. Then her swine were stolen, and her cows and horse driven off. Finally her oldest son, a boy of fourteen, was shot dead at the spring, and her house and barn were burned in broad daylight, and she and her children were left homeless and without food on a desolate mountain side. Many of her neighbors had been burned out the same day. They joined forces and wandered down the mountain, hungry, cold, with little children tugging at women's dresses, to a Union camp. From there they had been sent to Stevenson.

-Frank Wilkeson, Recollections of a private soldier in the Army of the Potomac
https://archive.org/details/recollectionsofp00wilk
Thanks for the link!

I have older relatives who were still too poor to afford shoes in the 40s in North Carolina, so I always assumed shoelessness would have been even more prevalent earlier.
 
Earlier this week I was reading an account of Cartersville Georgia 1864. I can't find the link in my history as I cleared the browser history but it referenced civilians and the wide use of sandals made from "scrap rope." This was a common practice in the environs of Texas and Mexico but that was the first time I'd read of such a practice anywhere else.

I've worn rope sandals and they will last a long time, they are not terribly uncomfortable. However, once they get wet the odor is... truly enlightening.
 
Rawhide (untanned animal hide, which would have been used to make shoes on the farm) also can get rather odoriferous when wet! I don't know if farm women making shoes would have attempted to tan the hides. Would they have used the Native American practice of treating the hide with the animal's brains and then smoking it?

As I pointed out, buying used clothing and shoes from door-to-door peddlers was a common practice. I read one account of a young wife who bought a used dress and made it over, only to once again remodel it into a wrapper (maternity dress). Of course women didn't discuss pregnancy (even in diaries) back then, but when she made the wrapper and then mentioned the birth of a baby five months later, the inference is obvious. (Source for this was a lecture by Elizabeth Stewart Clark at a workshop several years ago--she has made quite a study of the used clothing business.)

As I mentioned, I'm not too knowledgeable on the Confederate side, although I know that many of them had a hard time of it! So please consider my remarks as applying to Yankee women!

Thanks, @Brendan, for that Alfred Waud sketch! We owe so much visual knowledge to him and other sketch artists, since the photography of the time couldn't have any action in it due to the long exposure times required.
 
I was just thinking, would poor families have more than a single pair of shoes per person?

I had a conversation about this subject with my dad before he died, more than 30 years ago. When he was growing up in a small town working class neighborhood in the 1930's, the standard was two pair per person; one nice pair worn to church on Sunday morning all year long, and an ordinary pair used in cold weather only.

Contrary to popular belief today, my dad didn't recall seeing or hearing about any significant injuries; just the ordinary cuts and scrapes that you might experience on any part of your body from living an active outdoor lifestyle. He also didn't remember anyone seeming to be unhappy with the situation.

Many jobs required men to wear shoes every day, but they came off in the evening. Factory jobs required shoes, and protection was needed in animal pastures. Not just because it's disgusting to step in manure without shoes, but there was a risk of picking up a specific disease; a tapeworm that has been eradicated from the US in modern times. It's the only known disease to ever be spread by walking barefoot outdoors.

At CW living history events where the women are wearing house dresses, not dressed up to entertain guests, having all of them wear shoes indoors is not authentic. In all but the coldest weather, this would have served no purpose, social or practical.

There's been quite a bit of history revision on this subject, because people from the CW period nearly always put on shoes to pose for pictures, and we've been actively imposing modern values and preferences on historical people.

Unfortunately, you won't be allowed to do that; nearly all event rules say no barefooting! It's another one of those liability things--too much chance of broken beer bottles and such.

At all reinactment events? I seriously doubt that. The NPS has no such rules at battlefields. I've never seen a piece of broken glass at a CW battlefield. Bottles don't break when dropped in grass.
 
If you've ever had a 1200-lb. horse step on your foot. . . . It's bad enough when you're wearing shoes! Our farm girl wouldn't go barefoot around the team that was pulling the wagon or the reaper, either (draft horses weigh about 1800 lbs.).
I have! Not fun at all. That's why I suggested boots (hence mentioning Augusta's character) if portraying being in the fields...it helps with the dirt/mud/rocks/insects not getting in your shoes too...unless your feet are so calloused they're used to the terrain and have an older broken equine pulling the plow but there are a LOT of other pathogens a human can pick up from soil! However once it's plowed the other issues still exist and may get worse as the crops get higher and the insects flourish....let alone snakes. That's why I pity the barefoot soldiers! Now being barefoot out of the fields is a different story....especially since there was no germ theory back then.
The wealthy equestrian side saddle women portrayal requires riding boots like @Equestriangirl93 and myself.
 
Last edited:
I had a conversation about this subject with my dad before he died, more than 30 years ago. When he was growing up in a small town working class neighborhood in the 1930's, the standard was two pair per person; one nice pair worn to church on Sunday morning all year long, and an ordinary pair used in cold weather only.

Contrary to popular belief today, my dad didn't recall seeing or hearing about any significant injuries; just the ordinary cuts and scrapes that you might experience on any part of your body from living an active outdoor lifestyle. He also didn't remember anyone seeming to be unhappy with the situation.

Many jobs required men to wear shoes every day, but they came off in the evening. Factory jobs required shoes, and protection was needed in animal pastures. Not just because it's disgusting to step in manure without shoes, but there was a risk of picking up a specific disease; a tapeworm that has been eradicated from the US in modern times. It's the only known disease to ever be spread by walking barefoot outdoors.

At CW living history events where the women are wearing house dresses, not dressed up to entertain guests, having all of them wear shoes indoors is not authentic. In all but the coldest weather, this would have served no purpose, social or practical.

There's been quite a bit of history revision on this subject, because people from the CW period nearly always put on shoes to pose for pictures, and we've been actively imposing modern values and preferences on historical people.

Being that there was no germ theory back then that's understandable. One can pick up pathogens from the soil...especially where there is a lot of animal manure around.

At all reinactment events? I seriously doubt that. The NPS has no such rules at battlefields. I've never seen a piece of broken glass at a CW battlefield. Bottles don't break when dropped in grass.
 
I have! Not fun at all. That's why I suggested boots (hence mentioning Augusta's character) if portraying being in the fields...it helps with the dirt/mud/rocks/insects not getting in your shoes too...unless your feet are so calloused they're used to the terrain and have an older broken equine pulling the plow but there are a LOT of other pathogens a human can pick up from soil! However once it's plowed the other issues still exist and may get worse as the crops get higher and the insects flourish....let alone snakes. That's why I pity the barefoot soldiers! Now being barefoot out of the fields is a different story....especially since there was no germ theory back then.
The wealthy equestrian side saddle women portrayal requires riding boots like @Equestriangirl93 and myself.

Speaking of snakes--I was just looking back over Mollie Sanford's journal of her life on the frontier (Nebraska and Colorado) and came across this passage dated 30 June 1857:

I killed a rattle snake today, a huge one, with eleven rattles. But for its timely warning I might not be here to tell the tale. I was in my bare feet going down the path to the creek, and almost stepped upon it. The "rattles" are preserved as a trophy and his defunct snakeship hung on the limb of a tree, a warning to all of its kind. Only to think of being out here among wild cats, wolves, and snakes!!
This was of course very specific to her going down to the creek. She mentions wearing shoes quite a bit, and in fact later mentions she and her sister wearing men's boots out of fear of snakes. In Colorado Territory, she encountered Indian interpreter John Smith, who for a $5 gold piece procured her a pair of "very pretty" moccasins which she immediately put on and wore home. Sold and traded by local Native women, moccasins seem to have been a popular item among both women and men in Colorado at the time.

https://archive.org/details/molliethejournal013087mbp
 
Speaking of snakes--I was just looking back over Mollie Sanford's journal of her life on the frontier (Nebraska and Colorado) and came across this passage dated 30 June 1857:

I killed a rattle snake today, a huge one, with eleven rattles. But for its timely warning I might not be here to tell the tale. I was in my bare feet going down the path to the creek, and almost stepped upon it. The "rattles" are preserved as a trophy and his defunct snakeship hung on the limb of a tree, a warning to all of its kind. Only to think of being out here among wild cats, wolves, and snakes!!
This was of course very specific to her going down to the creek. She mentions wearing shoes quite a bit, and in fact later mentions she and her sister wearing men's boots out of fear of snakes. In Colorado Territory, she encountered Indian interpreter John Smith, who for a $5 gold piece procured her a pair of "very pretty" moccasins which she immediately put on and wore home. Sold and traded by local Native women, moccasins seem to have been a popular item among both women and men in Colorado at the time.

https://archive.org/details/molliethejournal013087mbp
Great find!
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top