matthew mckeon
Guest
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
I've just finished William Lee Miller's "Arguing About Slavery," an account of the "gag rule" imposed by slaveowners in Congress to prevent any discussion of slavery or abolition, in the 1830s and 40s.
The hero is John Quincy Adams, already in his seventies, as he uses his prestige, parliamentary skills and sheer stubborness to eventually overthrow the gag, and restore the right of petition and freedom of debate in Congress.
Adams, sarcastic, snobbish, yet capable of compassion and kindness, is described as a enormously intelligent figure, linked to the revolutionary generation of his father and mother, as well as the generation going to fight the war: Adams remembered the Battle of Bunker Hill, and freshman Congressman Abraham Lincoln was in the House, when Adams died there, still in harness.
Adams envisioned civil war breaking out over slavery, and that slavery would be ended by a president using war powers. It was an idea that was "terrible" but the abolishing of slavery would be "a glorious end"
For all the serious themes, it is a fast moving, very enjoyable book, painting a vivid picture of the still rough hewn Congress, the eccentrics and heroes of the early abolitionists, and a good primer on republican politics, at its best and worst.
The hero is John Quincy Adams, already in his seventies, as he uses his prestige, parliamentary skills and sheer stubborness to eventually overthrow the gag, and restore the right of petition and freedom of debate in Congress.
Adams, sarcastic, snobbish, yet capable of compassion and kindness, is described as a enormously intelligent figure, linked to the revolutionary generation of his father and mother, as well as the generation going to fight the war: Adams remembered the Battle of Bunker Hill, and freshman Congressman Abraham Lincoln was in the House, when Adams died there, still in harness.
Adams envisioned civil war breaking out over slavery, and that slavery would be ended by a president using war powers. It was an idea that was "terrible" but the abolishing of slavery would be "a glorious end"
For all the serious themes, it is a fast moving, very enjoyable book, painting a vivid picture of the still rough hewn Congress, the eccentrics and heroes of the early abolitionists, and a good primer on republican politics, at its best and worst.