A Confederate Spencer!!!!

Rusk County Avengers

Captain
Muster Stunt Master Stones River / Franklin 2022
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Location
Coffeeville, TX
Well, after some sad news in another thread about my good friend Tom, who spent all afternoon mentoring me in the art of the relic hunt, plus he had lost his cantankerous 105 WW2 vet father, but good thing I ended up being the bearer of possibly AWESOME news for him today.

And he asked me to make sure @ucvrelics takes note of this and let it be known he's laughing and grinning about it.

This story begins about ten years ago, Tom was sitting in his now closed museum reading, me and others jabbering most likely, and he said he wanted to get a Spencer for his collection. Not too long afterwards, he found a very nice condition one, made in I think he said in 1864 by the serial number, (which is unique all by itself), and it sat rotating between his study at home and display in his museum.

Flash forwards many years, to two years ago, while he was set up at the local reenactment packing his displays, me waiting in line for a tintype of my glorious self, I had a though, asked, and he let me borrow it and be pictured in Confederate uniform with it for laughs. Oh how little did we know!!!!

20210606_154958.jpg


Flash forward again, about a month ago he told me he heard a book had been written on Confederate markings on collected and captured arms, "Sure" says I, and he asked if I could get him a copy and I told him sure thing, delivering it to him today, and practically gifting it to him free of charge.

Now what spurred this, was apparently I'm guessing at a gunshow he heard of the book and how a "Z" was a Confederate mark, and he's wondered if an "X" on a rifled M1842 was Confederate, (at least I think he said it was a rifled one), and he had been wondering for a good while what a "Z" stamped on his Spencer meant.

Needless to say, he is a VERY thrilled and happy man right now! We looked it over, and compared to the book and it looks right. Not that either of us has read it yet. And seeing how he acquired this Spencer ten or more years ago, long before the 2019 publishing of the well known book, I think it very possible this ain't fake.

20220619_125258.jpg


20220619_125126.jpg



20220619_125132.jpg


20220619_125218.jpg


Now I ain't an expert, I hope the ones we have chime in, (you too @Grayrock Volunteer ), and I know since that book came out I've felt like many that that means a lot of fakery is probably going on, but the years and so forth, plus Tom getting it at a bargain I bet knowing him, I'm inclined to think this is genuine. But I could be wrong, on these types of things on arms, I look to be wrong.

We got to thinking, given its exceptional condition, it may not of been re-issued. Tom was trying to figure out where it could've been captured, and my hypothesis is the failed Dahlgren Raid, or whatever it was called towards Richmond in 1864. Mainly as I think when glancing through Tom's new favorite book when it came in I think Richmond was where the "Z" was out of.

But I'll shut my trap, and let those of superior knowledge to mine have their say.
 
I have that book and have read it at length. From the pictures you posted it appears (to me at least, but I'm FAR from an expert) that it's a legitimate Confederate depot repair mark.

I have a Smith carbine that was captured and reissued, or at least went through the repair depot, that is marked the same way.

View attachment 443453

View attachment 443452
"A Smith.................that is marked the same way". Not so, the letter is 90 degrees rotated from the positioning on the Spenser (or, is it 270 ???).
 
And he asked me to make sure @ucvrelics takes note of this and let it be known he's laughing and grinning about it.
Interesting Spencer. One thing I have always thought was how did the South get ammo for these as well as the other carbines that had special cartridges. Tell Tom to "Keep On Keeping On"
 
Last edited:
"A Smith.................that is marked the same way". Not so, the letter is 90 degrees rotated from the positioning on the Spenser (or, is it 270 ???).
I'm going into the dubious realm of speculation here, but if we consider that the C&R system was in use for several years, is it not feasible that the direction the letters were stamped could have changed over time? Or could a letter stamped in-line with the trigger guard have meant one thing and one stamped latterally meant something else?

In Knott's book, photos of a number of examples are shown, and letters are shown stamped both ways. In fact, he shows some stamped Q laterally and one stamped in-line with the trigger guard. This tells me that both are legitimate.

In addition, Arizona Swords has two Z marked on the site, one latterally and one in-line.
 
Last edited:
I didn't take it to mean they were saying the Z stamp wasn't legitimate. As you point out there are numerous examples of the letters being oriented different ways. I took it that they were poking a bit of fun as the stamp isn't "the same" due to orientation. Of course if the legitimacy WAS being questioned Ill just smile and chalk it up to jealousy lol.
 
Interesting Spencer. One thing I have always thought was how did the South get ammo for these as well as the other carbines that had special cartridges. Tell Tom to "Keep On Keeping On"
I don't think they got the ammo period.:rofl:

I recall reading one reference of Terry's Texas Rangers having them, but not being happy as ammo was unobtainable.

As for this particular one, I halfway bet it never got reissued. I'd wager it got collected, polished bright, inspected, and then sat till Richmond fell. Its wonderful condition, no remains of finish that I can recall, lack of serious marring on the stock, point that way to me.

I'll pass word along to Tom next time I speak to him. I know he's gonna get a kick out my evening at work, as me going over there to meddle with guns and metal detectors instead of more Father's Day type of stuff got me into trouble with a girl.
 
IMHO the "Z" is a legitimate Louis Zimmer stamp. He was at the Richmond Arsenal from 6/61 to 2/64.

He may have done nothing other than cleaning the mud off or your carbine, or replaced a screw, cleaned the bore, etc.
The only ammunition available would have captured as none was made in the South.

The "Z" indicates only its presence at the Richmond shop but is no indication it was ever reissued.

If your job was that all day when confronted with piles of captured guns, you'd grab one, do something to it as necessary, and whack on your letter, in this case a "Z" in no specific orientation with the bore or trigger guard and do the next one, again and again. :cry:
 
IMHO the "Z" is a legitimate Louis Zimmer stamp. He was at the Richmond Arsenal from 6/61 to 2/64.

He may have done nothing other than cleaning the mud off or your carbine, or replaced a screw, cleaned the bore, etc.
The only ammunition available would have captured as none was made in the South.

The "Z" indicates only its presence at the Richmond shop but is no indication it was ever reissued.

If your job was that all day when confronted with piles of captured guns, you'd grab one, do something to it as necessary, and whack on your letter, in this case a "Z" in no specific orientation with the bore or trigger guard and do the next one, again and again. :cry:
I wonder how many Spencers have turned up with this stamp?

Also seeing how the serial number if I remember right places it made in early 64, this gun was practically brand new when it went through his shop, and would've had to be at the end of his job. Also kind of knocks this out of being captured in the Dalgren Raid.

Thanks for your input. Not my carbine however, but I think I will have to let it be known if I get left anything out of this old friend's collection, I want this one. Plus the "US" Charleville I've already pulled that with.:D
 
I wonder how many Spencers have turned up with this stamp?

Also seeing how the serial number if I remember right places it made in early 64, this gun was practically brand new when it went through his shop, and would've had to be at the end of his job. Also kind of knocks this out of being captured in the Dalgren Raid.

Thanks for your input. Not my carbine however, but I think I will have to let it be known if I get left anything out of this old friend's collection, I want this one. Plus the "US" Charleville I've already pulled that with.:D
A serial number of 50,000 would put this in late 64 at best, but most likely early 65. In fact, taking the highest M1860 serial number to be 62,000... and backing into the deliveries of carbines (see fig 4-4 p.72 in Marcot "Spencer Repeating Firearms"), that would put this one as delivered 12/23/64 or 12/31/64. So unless this one was delivered directly to the Confederacy, the amount of time it would have been spent in Confederate hands was minimal. Still a cool find and discovery
 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top