8th U.S. Regular Infantry

Pennsylvania

Private
Joined
Dec 4, 2023
Location
Snyder County Pennsylvania
Hello, so I've been researching the U.S. regular infantry regiments lately particularly the 8th regiment and was wondering about their uniforms. since they were regulars was their uniform any different then that of the volunteer regiments? Such as things like fully dressed Hardee hats, dress coats and shoulder boards?

The main reason for my questions is because I have an ancestors that was transferred in October of 1862 from the 51st P.V.I. Co.E. to the 8th U.S. Infantry Co.A after the battle of Antietam. Thanks
 
Photo of a part the 8th U.S. Infantry in June 1863 from the LOC collection. It appears they are wearing the dark blue frock coats and light blue pants typical of the volunteer units.

8th-U.S.-Infantry.jpg
 
They would be uniformed in a similar manner with minor differences in details. They were subject to the same supply pipeline as the Volunteers. They may have been more likely to have the dreaded leather neck stock.


NOOOO!!! Not the neck stock!

Yes, the regulars were issued them. But they were for wear with the uniform, and not necessarily in fatigue dress. You can see in the image linked above of the 8th Infantrymen they are not wearing them (you can see their bare necks, and some shirt collars)...
1704689273337.png



Here's some men of Battery B, 1st US Artillery near Charleston in 1863 in fatigue dress, without the neck stocks...
1704689538867.png

1704689581821.png


The stock was worn with the uniform, particularly as the coat collars were cut at a slight angle. the stock covered the neck and shirt, etc.

1704689994833.png


1704690035276.png


Some volunteer units drew the neck stocks from the quartermasters, but as Mr. Gaede notes in this web article, they were not useful for active service in the field...

Gaede: the leather neck stock: military images...
 
I'm fairly certain that the Marine Corp were issued them quite consistently. The Regular Army came in second. And then the volunteer service came in last.

The thread from the forum does also cover this.
 
For the uninitiated the neckstock was a piece of formalwear that was popular in the 18th and early 19th centuries. The leather version used by the U.S. Army and Marine Corps was used manly for dress occasions, but also posture correction, and possibly offered some protection against sword blows.

If I can find the reproduction that I have, I'd share a picture of an example.
 
I'm fairly certain that the Marine Corp were issued them quite consistently. The Regular Army came in second. And then the volunteer service came in last.

The thread from the forum does also cover this.

The Marines were provided with the leather neck stock too, but like the Army, they did not ALWAYS wear them. Check out these Marines in full uniform at Washington.
1704814860957.png


Or in fatigue dress...
1704815008669.png


During the 1830s, veterans record that that the neck stock was almost ALWAYS worn. It was only a European military fashion, applied to American soldiers and Marines. It prevented the regular soldier from relaxing in ranks, or turning his head, etc. Viz. an aid in perfecting the drill and making "machine soldiers."

1704820433155.png


By the 1860s, however, they were less objectionable in design than previously, but still unpopular with the soldiers... From the British service.

1704815335198.png




The 1860s version were still issued to the regular troops after 1863:

1704815172786.png
 
The Marines were provided with the leather neck stock too, but like the Army, they did not ALWAYS wear them. Check out these Marines in full uniform at Washington.
View attachment 494875

Or in fatigue dress...
View attachment 494876

During the 1830s, veterans record that that the neck stock was almost ALWAYS worn. It was only a European military fashion, applied to American soldiers and Marines. It prevented the regular soldier from relaxing in ranks, or turning his head, etc. Viz. an aid in perfecting the drill and making "machine soldiers."

View attachment 494888

By the 1860s, however, they were less objectionable in design than previously, but still unpopular with the soldiers... From the British service.

View attachment 494878



The 1860s version were still issued to the regular troops after 1863:

View attachment 494877
I apologize if I made it sound like they wore them, or were supposed to wear consistently. That was not my intention. Thanks for the correction.
 
They look like they would be very unpleasant to wear on a hot summer day.

They evidently were, and were intended to be, lest the soldier appear comfortable.

Here's some German recruits drilling with neck stocks about 1840...

1704845570973.png


and some British infantry in the 1860s...

1704846436607.png


American troops in the 1860s didn't bother with the neck stock in active service for a couple of reasons. Comfort being one, but the fact you can't turn your head makes it difficult to act as "riflemen and light infantry" in the manner of Hardee's and Casey's tactics, etc.

Col. Freemantle of the British Army, noted of US troops in 1863...

1704845999611.png

1704846030055.png


1704845857688.png


1704846097900.png
 
Another question I have is Would soldiers be issued a fatigue uniform and a dress uniform or how did that work?

The Regular Army of the United States provided each soldier a uniform, and fatigue dress.

The uniform looked like this...
1704846863393.png

the fatigue dress was this, a forage cap in lieu of the uniform hat, and flannel blouse in lieu of the uniform coat etc.
1704847067137.png


Most US troops took the field in their fatigue dress...

1704846722960.png



The regulars were given an allowance of clothing, from the table shown in a previous post above. IF they had to draw more than what the table allowed, they were charged for it from their pay.

The Volunteer troops that composed the bulk of the Union army were not issued clothing like the regulars. They were allowed clothing money, at the same cost as the clothing allowance to a regular soldier. Most Volunteer units, after 1861, just purchased US Army clothing, particularly the fatigue dress. There were some units that insisted their men procure dress uniforms, but that was an exception rather than the rule. Any part of the clothing money not spent the soldier would evidently get in cash at the end of the year, etc.

1704847534007.png

1704847570923.png


Unlike the regular troops, who would be punished for discarding their clothing and equipment, the volunteer troops did so at will, as they technically paid for it, etc. But according to John D. Billings, the men and their officers were chock up the losses to "battle" and claim gratuitous replacements from the quartermasters...

1704847639091.png


1704847703381.png

1704847753195.png


The clothing money system did not survive the war.
A law of March 3, 1865 directed all volunteer troops in federal service would thereafter receive the same amount of clothing, in kind, as enlisted men of the same arm in the regular army.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top