Trivia 4-4-16 Identify

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow this one was a tough one! Perhaps the toughest yet! I recognized there sketch as one in a series of a few done and published in '61 & '62. But man was info tough to come by!

Fort Holt , " Colonel Cook commanding Post. The garrison consisted of a brigade - Seventh and Twenty-eighth Illinois and McAllister's battery"

The 64 pdr was named "Lady Grant", wasn't is effective as could have been in it's brief conflict appearances as they only had 32lb ammo to shoot :thumbsdown:

On the subject matter of this basically obscure battery, here is a wonderful link that includes several letters from a very young private in garrison at Ft Holt

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ilmaga/scott/newspapers/Thomasletters.pdf

and also a neat link to an expired auction of a Ft Holt Id'd soldier tintype with lock of hair included
http://www.collectibles-articles.co...FORT-HOLT-KY-w-ID-HAIR-LOCK_110707454405.html

And for those who had trouble finding some of the info, here is the OR
https://books.google.com/books?id=y7xZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=fort+holt,+ky+64+pdr+artillery&source=bl&ots=oP-vkY-jRb&sig=L5KXHBJE7Kowaw2FQp49FBW2vTg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihsZf2ovbLAhWE1CYKHSfeC1wQ6AEIJDAB#v=onepage&q=fort holt, ky 64 pdr artillery&f=false
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My compliments to a detailed and obscure question /picture hint. That is why it is "trivia".

1. Fort Holt, KY
2. Lt. George C. Gumbart Commanding Artillery, 2nd Illinois Light Artillery, Battery E
(and/or at different time)
Capt Ed McAllister, Commanding Artillery, McAllister's Battery, 1st Illinois Artillery, (see note sources)
3. 8" Colimbiad was a 64 pounder, the LOC titled "Sketch Plan,Columbiad Battery for Fort Holt" is dated July 18/64 ? after the war ? https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3954f.cw0220000/
found no nickname ? therefore by research or lack thereof would go with

3. "James Rifle", Model 1829 32-Pound Siege / Garrison gun rifled by the James method, (Charles T. James)
shot a 64 pound projectile shell, 6.4" bore

Unlike the "Lady Polk / or misquoted Lady Davis" nickname for the exploding gun at Columbus, KY Fort Haleck. :cannon:
I like all trivia entries with sources and links, as I learn the details of ACW, so here goes, a little long winded :running:

Fort Holt
kyhistory.pastperfectonline.com/webobject/A515E2A1-85DC-414F-BE5D-770139665034http://civilwartalk.com/attachments/4-4-16-jpg.96400/

Fort named for Joseph Holt

January 18, 1861 former Postmaster General is appointed Secretary of War (appointed to both by President Buchanan)
Lincoln removed him for Stanton late 1861, (some sources imply it may have been Holt's suggestion). Holt became Judge Advocate General 1862 - 1865, in late 1864 he declined Lincoln's offer to be appointed Attorney General.
http://www.mrlincolnswhitehouse.org...-generals-and-admirals-joseph-holt-1807-1894/

Fort Holt
usaflag.gif

(1861 - 1864), Wickliffe (Kentucky)
A Union fort that protected the military depot at Cairo, Illinois. The actual site has been washed away by the Ohio River.
http://www.northamericanforts.com/East/kywest.html#holt

FRANK LESLIE'S ILLUSTRATED NEWSPAPER, New York, NY, October 12, 1861

FORT HOLT KENTUCKY.
Cairo being the point d'appui of our Western military operations necessitates the establishment of other points to protect it. Hence Cape Girardeau on the north, Bird's Point on the west, Paducah on the east, and Fort Holt on the south. This latter fort is situated on the Kentucky side of the Ohio, and almost immediately opposite Cairo. It is named in honor of that noble Kentuckian, Joseph Holt, who during the short time he held the War Department after the defection of Floyd, endeavored to repair the damage caused by his fraudulent predecessor. Our readers will perceive that Fort Holt is rapidly becoming as impregnable as Cairo, which city it at once protects and is protected by. With Fort Holt and Paducah in our possession, troops can be thrown into any part of Kentucky to crush Secession and assist the Unionists. Our larger picture represents the troops landing on the Kentucky shore to commence the building of Fort Holt. The rapidity with which they have proceeded with their arduous task reflects the highest credit on their industry and skill.


NOT to be confused with Battery Holt near Cincinnati, f/k/a Three Mile Creek and Licking Point Battery
http://www.cincinnaticwrt.org/data/ohio in the war/1862 Defense of Cincinnati/iv_defenses.pdf

Stationed at Fort Holt
2nd Illinois Light Artillery, Battery E
Lt. Gumbart Commanding Artillery

"The Battery, ( E ) Lieutenant Gumbart commanding, moved to Cairo, September 14th; moved to Fort Holt and Jefferson, Ky., and then returned to Cairo. On November 1st, Lieutenant Gumbart's section went on an expedition to Bloomfield, Mo., and January 9, 1862, to Columbus, Ky., and returned."
http://civilwar.illinoisgenweb.org/history/a-002-lt.html

Stationed at Fort Holt
1st Illinois Artillery, Battery D
Capt Ed McAllister, Commanding Artillery, McAllister's Battery,
for a short period prior to engagement at Fort Henry
https://books.google.com/books?id=CnYVAQAAMAAJ&pg=P***0&lpg=P***0&dq=commander+fort+holt+battery+civil+war&source=bl&ots=3IybdYY2fA&sig=4NAhPFHQVMfxISVtK2ZvOJtU97I&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8tYef3fXLAhUBqx4KHeF4CT84ChDoAQgnMAI#v=onepage&q=commander fort holt battery civil war&f=false

"The regiment (7th IL Infantry) went into winter (1861) quarters at Fort Holt, Ky.,
Colonel Cook commanding Post. The garrison consisted of a brigade - Seventh and Twenty-eighth
Illinois and McAllister's battery. General Grant commanded the District of Cairo."

"By April 1862 both of these forts (Jefferson & Holt) were deserted. Fort Holt having been flooded out in the spring. Federal forces in far western Kentucky concentrated at Columbus and Paducah." Ft. Jefferson (& Holt)
Historical Marker Text, Fort Jefferson, Wickliffe, KY
15950707-9f4f-4abc-abcf-6db7a93d3b57.jpg


"By late September 1861, there were 3,595 federal troops in Fort Holt and more than 2,000 at Fort Jefferson. Refugees, mostly former slaves, flooded Union lines soon after the forts were established. They were put to work by General Grant on the fortifications at Fort Holt and worked felling trees and digging earthworks.

"Troops from Fort Jefferson and Fort Holt were sent to Elliott's Mill and involved in skirmishes and reconnaissance in late September 1861. Fort Holt troops later went on a September 26 raid on Blandville and arrested secessionists on September 26. All troops from Fort Holt went with General Grant and fought in the Battle of Belmont.

"Most of the troops from Fort Holt and Jefferson accompanied General Grant to Forts Henry and Donelson as the western theatre moved east and south. On January 10, 1862 Federal troops were sent to Fort Jefferson as a diversion to distract Confederates at Fort Henry and Donelson.

64- pounder James Rifle, , a model 1829 32-pounder rifled using the "James" (Charles T. James) method
used a 64 pound "shot" which was a projectile developed by James using his birdcage method "James pattern solid shot"
JamesShell.jpg
A James pattern solid shot. The "birdcage" at the base would have been covered by sheet lead which, upon firing the gun, would have expanded into the grooves of the rifling.

http://www.civilwarartillery.com/projectiles/halfshells/IIA9.htm

Edit - It appears that Lt. Gumbart commanded a battery at Fort Holt at one time, but not the battery that included the 64-pounder. "James Rifle" would be the generic name of the gun, but not the nickname by which this particular piece was known.

Hoosier
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fort Holt
Grant
Lady Polk

Edit - The Lady Polk was a cannon in the Confederate Army, named after Gen. Leonidas Polk's wife. It came to an inglorious end when it exploded during a demonstration firing in November of 1861.

Hoosier
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fort Holt
Lieutenant Wood
"Lady Grant"

Sources:
http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/1862/january/fort-holt.htm
http://smile.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_5_11?url=search-alias=stripbooks&field-keywords=grant+moves+south+bruce+catton&sprefix=grant+moves,stripbooks,174

Edit - Since there is ambiguity as to whether Lt. Wood or Capt. McAllister should have been considered to be in charge of McAllister's Battery, I will accept either one of those as a correct answer to the second part of the question.

While theoretically, Col. Cook as commander of the fort or Gen. Grant as overall commander of Union troops in the area could have been considered in charge of the battery, I think that the way the question was phrased, it was asking for the name of the person who had specific responsibility for that battery, not somebody in overall command. Thus, I am not accepting Cook or Grant as a correct answer.

Hoosier
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top