Lincoln (2012)

Upon reviewing 101combatvet's errant criticisms of the movie to me that the real problem isn't the authenticity of the movie, but that he dislikes the subject. There is nothing wrong with disliking a movie, it isn't going to be everyone's cup of tea. But when one dislikes a movie because it proves too accurate to fit with one's view of history...

Even so, it is not a documentary or a book, it is a movie for the general audience. That comes with advantages and disadvantages.
 
Upon reviewing 101combatvet's errant criticisms of the movie to me that the real problem isn't the authenticity of the movie, but that he dislikes the subject. There is nothing wrong with disliking a movie, it isn't going to be everyone's cup of tea. But when one dislikes a movie because it proves too accurate to fit with one's view of history...

Even so, it is not a documentary or a book, it is a movie for the general audience. That comes with advantages and disadvantages.

Now you're a mind reader.... wonderful. :confused:
 
I didn't have to read minds, I just read your posts where you gave your reasons. Then I read the posts that effectively refuted the claims you made, yet your opinion has not changed when the errors of your observations were brought to your attention.

No errors on my part. So you are saying that Stevens sleep with his house keeper? Really? How would you know? :bounce:

And because your grandfather could recite Yankee Doodle Dandy you believe a soldier could have recited the Gettysburg Address to Lincoln in 1864. Sure..... :nerd: just not logical for the period in question.
 
Well, I've seen how this sort of thing plays out with you before 101combatvet, when you were claiming Lincoln had 300 Sioux executed or some such, despite extremely well documented evidence to the contrary. This seems to be a similar episode where your logic disconnects from reality.
 
Well, I've seen how this sort of thing plays out with you before 101combatvet, when you were claiming Lincoln had 300 Sioux executed or some such, despite extremely well documented evidence to the contrary. This seems to be a similar episode where your logic disconnects from reality.

He should have paid his bill..... it would have saved a lot of lives.... or do you disagree with that also?
 
Apparently, it didn't get much attention during the war.... afterwards yes.

New York Times, November 20, 1863...
Gettysburg_Address,_New_York_Times Nov. 20, 1863.jpg
 
Read those "facts"... they don't address what I have posted... nice spin though.

101combatvet,

Actually, they have.

You stated in your previous post:

"Blacks in the House when the vote is cast...really?"

A verifiable source was given that showed blacks were in the House when the vote was cast, to include Charles Douglass, son of the abolitionist leader, Frederick Douglass.
(Source: Final Freedom: The Civil War, The Abolition of Slavery, and the Thirteenth Amendment, by Michael Vorenberg.)

You said you had a problem with the idea of:

"Celebrations in the streets after the passing of the 13th Amendment."

A website was provided that showed Northern newspapers reporting celebrations on the passage of the 13th Amendment, from within the House chamber itself, to the firing of a 100 cannon salute, to celebrations in the city of Washington itself.
http://www.newsinhistory.com/blog/us-congress-passes-13th-amendment-abolish-slavery


You stated you had a problem believing that:

"White soldiers reciting the Gettysburg Address... what country bumpkins could do that? The last lines by the Harvard grad."

A website was provided showing that the sweeping statement by you that apparently all Union soldiers were country bumpkins shows that there were many educated soldiers in the Union army, with quite a few from Harvard who were more than capable of reading, memorizing, and repeating the Gettysburg Address in its entirety, as the speech was reported in almost every Northern newspaper of the time which were avidally read by Union soldiers.
http://news.havard.edu/gazette/story/2012/03/blue-gray-and-crimson/


You stated you had problems with the movie version of:

"The peace negotiations...covered in another thread."

The thread was provided so any and all at this forum could view it and make up their own minds on how close the actual Hampton Roads Peace Conference was compared to the movie script.
http://civilwartalk.com/threads/the-hampton-roads-conference-as-presented-in-the-movie-lincoln.78373


You had problems with the movie version of:

"Thaddeus Stevens sleeping with his black house keeper - unproven."

A website was provided about that house keeper, Lydia Hamilton Smith so others of the forum could make up their own minds on that topic, even though your initial assumption appears to be correct.
http://stevensandsmith.org/


You seem to be unconvinced of the idea that:

"Black (Union) soldiers speaking like Harvard grads."

You make a follow-up comment that most black "USCT reenactors I've met over the years don't talk smack like that." So present-day USCT reenactors are somehow, in your opinion, representative of the nearly 180,000 Civil War era USCTs in the way they spoke in the 1860s? An interesting personal opinion that takes nothing into account nor references any of the free blacks or former slaves that resided in the North and more than likely had no 'southern' accents nor gives any reference to the blacks that were enrolled in Northern colleges, such as Oberlin College in Ohio for one. The fact of the matter is, just like the story of Thaddeus Stevens sleeping with his black house keeper is uproven, so is your theory that "Black soldiers speaking like Harvard grads" is also unproven, merely an opinion you have given to express your dislike of the movie.

You also are uncomfortable with the idea of:

"Tad's collection of glass negative plates depicting slaves."

Well, here my search did hit a dry hole, as I cannot find any sources or references that state consicely shows Tad Lincoln had a "collection of glass negative plates depicting slaves." But when I watched the movie, I didn't get the impression of a "collection" more than I did a few pictures, one in particular showing a slave.

But hey, I guess its all in the eye/opinion of the beholder/movie-goer. :smile:

There is one thought that I come away with after doing all this research on your opinions you expressed above in your previous post.

Certainty is not proof.
Insistence is not fact.
Opinion is not evidence.

Sorry you didn't enjoy the movie more.

Sincerely,
Unionblue
 
And because your grandfather could recite Yankee Doodle Dandy you believe a soldier could have recited the Gettysburg Address to Lincoln in 1864. Sure..... :nerd: just not logical for the period in question.

More than logical and very much reported in the press at the time.

The Gettysburg Address (Newspaper reactions to the Gettysburg Address).

"On the day following the Gettysburg dedication, many of the nation's newspapers reprinted the speech, along with the one given by Edward Everett..."

Read the rest of the article and see what newspapers had to say about the address here:

http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/gettysburg/ideas_more.htm

The fact of the matter is, the speech was widely published, and there is more than a good chance that the speech could be memorized by some Union troops, who read newspapers avidly and whose camps were often followed by newspaper vendors.

Unionblue
 
Soldiers read the newspapers A LOT, and had discussions about what they read. We do it online - they did it face to face. When they were in camp for any length of time, there wasn't much else to do.

And unlike our kids, rote learning was something you did. All the time. Memorizing. Which I frankly think is a really good thing. None of my kids have that skill.....well, until they get to me.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top