Gettysburg 88

iron bender

Corporal
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Location
Texas
Found a couple pics from the 125th. Me (13 year old drummer) and my buddy David, and a unit pic. Probably half the guys in this pic were a couple years out from getting to go play sandmen in Kuwait then Iraq

IMG_0992.webp


IMG_6612.webp
 
I was there with Holmes' Brigade from Missouri, with additional friends from Illinois, Iowa, Arkansas, Kansas, Colorado and Oklahoma who fell in with us. We had enough to form two companies. Here I am leading one of the companies as part of the Iron Brigade during the first day reenactment:
View attachment 585809
Remember when that marching line of Black Hats just kept going and going and going? Didn't we all feel 9 feet tall that day?
 
Our unit above got folded in with the bucktails. I think I may still have mine in a box somewhere. We were a mutt group of the older Regular Army guys from Ft. Riley, Ft. Hood, Germany, and then my young buddies from Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi. We tried to max three or four events a year. Pleasant Hill and Vicksburg were always on the list (no Vicksburg in 88)
 
I didn't get there. I went down with the color guard!
Our company was on the right flank, and there was a danged old 24pdr howitzer on the slope behind us firing over our heads. The concussion like'-to lifted the hats off our heads! Retreating into the woods was a more reasonable choice. I assumed it was to be a "historical" scenario where we would drive some rebels back, possibly capture their colonel, then be forced to retreat. How naive.
 
Our company was on the right flank, and there was a danged old 24pdr howitzer on the slope behind us firing over our heads. The concussion like'-to lifted the hats off our heads! Retreating into the woods was a more reasonable choice. I assumed it was to be a "historical" scenario where we would drive some rebels back, possibly capture their colonel, then be forced to retreat. How naive.
As I recall, the 2nd day scenario was broken pretty badly. We were pulled off the line and marched around to the back because some opposing Confederate commander had a habit of breaking scenarios and flanking. So we spent a while in like a reserve position. It did allow a cool 50 yard line view of the inside of the Federal line. I don't remember much besides a lot of dust and smoke, and a commander riding by on a white horse.
 
The Union artillery was in two parallel lines because there were so many guns. We were in the second line nearest the spectators. While we had a good view of the battle, the downside is that the spectators kept crowding into us, despite ours and the organizers' best efforts to keep them back. I remember one guy mouthing off about how he had paid to see the battle and didn't like being told to stay back. Several of the guns, including ours, stopped firing because of the safety issues.
 
I was there with Holmes' Brigade from Missouri, with additional friends from Illinois, Iowa, Arkansas, Kansas, Colorado and Oklahoma who fell in with us. We had enough to form two companies. Here I am leading one of the companies as part of the Iron Brigade during the first day reenactment:
View attachment 585809
This is all a lot better than my perception of 80s reenactment has been - I for all I know, might be looking at the campaigners of '88 in these images, as you might be somewhat aware that 80s-90s reenactment now has a reputation for supposedly being very low quality and "farby" these days, at least among those of us who were not there to see it. All of these would, at least look better than any Mainstreamers today. Love all these pictures, especially the one you've posted here.
 
Actually, I think you are looking at the campaigners of '88. Only the word wasn't in general use yet. We called ourselves "the authentics." (Take a moment to breathe in the hubris.) The "authentic/campaigner/progressive/hardcore" movement was really in its infancy at the time.
 
Actually, I think you are looking at the campaigners of '88. Only the word wasn't in general use yet. We called ourselves "the authentics." (Take a moment to breathe in the hubris.) The "authentic/campaigner/progressive/hardcore" movement was really in its infancy at the time.
Right, this is the way I have understood it at the time. It's nice to be able to directly confirm that.
 
Right, this is the way I have understood it at the time. It's nice to be able to directly confirm that.
The difference at the time wasn't museum quality uniforms or the gnat's eyelash level of detail that characterizes the movement later on. Really the only thing separating a "hardcore" from everybody else back then was that we used the equipment the way it was designed to be used. We ate hardtack and fatback out of our haversacks. We drank the water in our canteens. We carried our stuff in our knapsacks or in bedrolls. I was using a bedroll at the time. Using the gear gives it an authenticity that can't be simulated.
I was operating with the principle at the time that it is better to do without than use the wrong item. I didn't have period-correct underwear. They were hard to find and expensive. Yeah, you can see where this is going. So a week at Gettysburg in the summer: heat, dust, sweat, wool. I was chafing. Big time. Walking like I'd joined the cavalry. Some people say they walked a layer off their brogans at Gettysburg. I think I walked a layer off my thighs. Perhaps my operating principle was a little extreme...
 
Actually, I think you are looking at the campaigners of '88. Only the word wasn't in general use yet. We called ourselves "the authentics." (Take a moment to breathe in the hubris.) The "authentic/campaigner/progressive/hardcore" movement was really in its infancy at the time.
In the early '80s the difference between those novices who claimed to be "Civil War reenactors" and those who strove for greater authenticity was already vast. Our unit was as authentic as possible in those days. Our captain, who had been reenacting since 1964, suggested we attend an event in southern Illinois to support a local unit which had joined us on occasion. They were striving for greater authenticity, but it was an uphill battle in their area. As a result we attended our first "farb fest." It was an eye opener to those of use who had never attended one. As an example, the "unit" that camped next to us consisted of two young men in cavalry uniforms -- the Umpti-Umpth Illinois Regiment. And they came equiped with a quarter-scale Parrott rifle which they were very proud of, since they knew that cavalry often had their own artillery. Of course they had no horses. They were likeable and very sincere, so we said nothing to burst their bubble, but they were typical (you should have seen the Confederates). The Rebs were also typical for the time; as soon as we pushed their line back in the "battle," their "wounded" played Possum and opened fire on us from behind. I'm sure today's "authentics" (we used to call them "stitch counters") would make fun of our humble beginnings in authenticity, but it was a start in the right direction.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top