- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Location
- Middle Tennessee
Thi seems a common refrain -- that the flag is misused or hijacked. But why is it misuse?
Because it is a symbol of resistance to overreaching, particularly federal, authority.
Thi seems a common refrain -- that the flag is misused or hijacked. But why is it misuse?
Such is your political use of the flag. But why is that not the misuse? It seems false to me.Because it is a symbol of resistance to overreaching, particularly federal, authority.
Such is your political use of the flag.
But why is that not the misuse?
It seems false to me.
My political use? What am I doing politically with the flag?
You said the flag "is a symbol of resistance to overreaching, particularly federal, authority." This is a political use (or misuse) of the flag.
Viewed by whom? Definitey not by me. In fact I find the idea laughable.That's the way it's viewed. It didn't say I viewed it that way or used it that way, I simply answered your question.
Viewed by whom? Definitey not by me. In fact I find the idea laughable.
You seems to think it viewed that way, so depite your wiggling, it seems to me that is your political use of the flag.
'fine' is such a soft, ambivalent term. And 'all' is overly broad.
I would be happy if some things were removed/changed.
I dont care about some other things
and there are some that I see a value in so i wouldnt support changing.
You declared that the flag is "a symbol of resistance to overreaching, particularly federal, authority" -- this is a political use of the flag.Please show me an example of my political use of the CBF.
It was time for the excuse of heritage to face up to the fact the flag represents other things, things that put it in a negative light, and that it was surrendered to such without hardly a struggle from those who claim heritage.
Heritage advocates need to admit such and should prepare to compromise, not demand.
Unionblue
You declared that the flag is "a symbol of resistance to overreaching, particularly federal, authority" -- this is a political use of the flag.
And we are back to post #40 where I asked "why is it misue" or why was it wrongfully so?And the Dixiecrats, upon that basis used it as such, wrongfully, in my view.
With all due respect, Union, I wasn't even born then. I am not bound by their lapse. By the way, I've not noticed much effort to wrest the Stars and Stripes from the Klan or Or such. I 60 years could we say the same about it?
And we are back to post #40 where I asked "why is it misue" or why was it wrongfully so?
CMWinkler,
It does not matter when you or I was born.
We both can read and we both can see and we can both form our own speech and actions based on research and sober thought. We are both responsible people and we have responsibilities to our time and place. The flag and our issues with it is one of our responsibilities. This is because of its continuation of abuse by others before and during our time. We're stuck with it and we have to clean up the mess of our grandfathers have left us.
As for the U.S. flag, I think we both know what it stands for and every time the Klan or such use it, they defeat themselves showing it.
MY flag is more than a symbol of oppression and hate. The CBF cannot make that same statement, in my own view.
Sincerely,
Unionblue
Don't these people have anything of value to do? As a for instance...studying history? This country is far from perfect, and the struggle to make it what it is today was far from perfect. We need to accept this as a United Nation instead of polarizing in an effort to see "who wins this one". I think we as a younger country have proven that "A Nation divided does not stand..."With the Confederate battle flag being removed across the country from official flagpoles, store shelves and nearly every place in between, other symbols of the Confederacy are now under scrutiny, among them Generals Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, J.E.B. Stuart, P.G.T. Beauregard
More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ns-to-lee-stuart-beauregard-and-d-w-griffith/
This sounds like you'd prefer to be defined and bound only by the parts of your heritage that you like, and not by the rest. The heritage thing cuts both ways.And I, respectfully, disagree. While we may have to deal with the mess we are left, we certainly are neither defined by it nor bound by it, in my view, of course.
And I, respectfully, disagree. While we may have to deal with the mess we are left, we certainly are neither defined by it nor bound by it, in my view, of course.
Sorry I can't in good conscience put a "like" on your post. I agree with you wholeheartedly but can't bring myself to like where all this is going...CMWinkler,
And I tend to look at my grandchildren, so young and so full of hope, and worry about the nation and world WE are leaving them with.
Sincerely,
Unionblue