The information is outdated? What was done 100 years ago hasn't changed at all. What was done has actually remained the same, the incidents of corruption haven't magically gone away. Any ranking of anything is going to be subject to opinion, however just because one disagrees with another's opinion doesn't mean its outdated.
One can say "outdated" or "revisonist" trying to impugn another's position by implication, but has little to do with merit...….
heres a list from 2017, not very outdated
https://socawlege.com/10-best-worst-u-s-presidents-order/
US news 2014
https://www.usnews.com/news/special-reports/the-worst-presidents/slideshows/the-10-worst-presidents
To try to pretend theres some consensus he wasnt one of the worst seems a bit disingenuous as one can easily find he's ranked far more often on the bottom half then the top, and frequently towards the bottom of the bottom even today. At best hes generally rated midpack which would be mediocre. As its subjective, can easily see one disagreeing, however trying to imply the other opinions are "outdated" or somehow irrelevant or disingenuous simply because you disagree is .….
Also not sure what one believes he inherited has to do with anything, every president besides Washington has inherited previous president's problems, they are judged on what they did about it.