Two William Harlans same County, now what?

Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Location
Wheeling, WV
If I can possibly figure out if one of these two William Harlan's are the same one in my family tree than I'm up to 7 yanks 2 rebs for grandfathers. (Not bragging.. OK, maybe a little.) The problem is they are both from Belmont county one is with the 78th Ohio infantry D.co the other with the 122nd Ohio infantry A.co. All I know is the William I'm looking for Was born 1848 died 1901 making him a little young but I Question the birth year cause he had a son in 1863.
 
The 1850 census for Belmont County, Ohio shows William Harlen, son of Daniel and Margaret Harlen. The spelling difference is not surprising back then. This William clearly shows 7 years of age, which would mean born in about 1843. Although the "7" in his age slot is a bit faded, and could potentially be mistaken for a "1", it absolutely is a 7, as the family is listed according to age. His sister, Penina, age 9, is shown just before him and his brother, James, age 6, is listed immediately after.
Family trees do seem to show this same William as born in 1848, but my best guess is that they are mistakenly basing that on this census, which AT FIRST GLANCE, appears to show his age as 1, but it is without a doubt, a 7.
This would certainly be a CW veteran.

There was another William HARLAN in the 1850 Belmont County census, born 1849, son of Samuel and Eleanor, another reason why some family trees could be attributing a younger age to the other William, simply confusing the two.

Unfortunately, my access to fold3 through my local library is down at the moment, but I will check later.
 
The William Harlan in the 122nd enlisted in 1862 at age 38, giving him an approximate year of birth of 1824. This does not sound like your ancestor.

The William Harlan in the 78th enlisted in 1861 at age 24, giving him an approximate year of birth of 1837. He went on to serve as a major in the 159th.
 
Finding two individuals, with the same name, of similar ages, in the same neighborhood is a familiar nightmare to genealogists. Have you followed the tried-and-true procedure of methodically tracking back? If so, you have a good idea of his households--both birth and marital. You can use the correct household to hone in on your William Harlan. Leap-frogging backwards never is a good idea.

Edit for grammar (forgot a comma)
 
Last edited:
The 1850 census for Belmont County, Ohio shows William Harlen, son of Daniel and Margaret Harlen. The spelling difference is not surprising back then. This William clearly shows 7 years of age, which would mean born in about 1843. Although the "7" in his age slot is a bit faded, and could potentially be mistaken for a "1", it absolutely is a 7, as the family is listed according to age. His sister, Penina, age 9, is shown just before him and his brother, James, age 6, is listed immediately after.
Family trees do seem to show this same William as born in 1848, but my best guess is that they are mistakenly basing that on this census, which AT FIRST GLANCE, appears to show his age as 1, but it is without a doubt, a 7.
This would certainly be a CW veteran.

There was another William HARLAN in the 1850 Belmont County census, born 1849, son of Samuel and Eleanor, another reason why some family trees could be attributing a younger age to the other William, simply confusing the two.

Unfortunately, my access to fold3 through my local library is down at the moment, but I will check later.
This is the one, father Daniel mother Margret.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top