Tracking down a mystery ship

Mark F. Jenkins

Colonel
Member of the Year
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Location
Central Ohio
Now, this isn't the first time I've been confronted with the possibility of the existence of another ironclad, outside of the ones I've heard of... but it hasn't happened recently (and by that, I mean in at least a couple of decades).

I'm reading Donald S. Frazier's Thunder Across the Swamp: The Fight for the Lower Mississippi, February 1863 - May 1863 (good read but almost too detailed) and I've run into several references to an "ironclad" called CSS Stevens. Specifically, this is called a vessel that was never finished, so on the surface it's not surprising that it's not widely known... but I've just never seen a reference to it anywhere before, so I'm confounded.

There is precisely one reference in the Official Records, Navies to what must be the same vessel, but it's not particularly enlightening. In Series I, Volume 20, pp. 822-825, there are reproduced excerpts from a report of CSA Major General Richard Taylor of 23 April 1863, wherein he states:

" * * * I was compelled to order the destruction of the gunboat Stevens, below New Iberia; she was in [the] charge of the Navy Department, and under command of Lieutenant Humphreys, C.S. Navy [presumably Lt. Joshua Humphreys, CSN --MFJ]. That officer reporting to me that she was in an unfinished condition and unfit for action with the enemy, there being no means of getting her out of reach of the enemy, I ordered her to be sunk as low down the bayou as possible, so that she would afford an obstruction to the enemy's boats ascending. This order was not carried out as given by me, but she was sunk about 2 miles below New Iberia, when she might have been sunk 5 or 6 miles lower."

The fullest description given by Frazier, on page 98 of Thunder Across the Swamp:

". . . Two miles below New Iberia at the Olivier plantation, Orange Grove, crews worked steadily to transform the cottonclad gunboat Hart into the ironclad CSS Stevens, named for Lieutenant Henry Kennedy Stevens, the former executive officer of the CSS Arkansas who had been killed on board the [gunboat J. A.] Cotton in January. When finished, Stevens would be a dangerous boat, boasting 32-pounders fore and aft, and a 24-pounder in each broadside, all protected by three-inch railroad iron. She would probably equal anything else afloat in Berwick Bay."

Unfortunately, Frazier's citation for the paragraph gives no clue as to the source of this information, being concerned with sourcing a list of boats earlier in the paragraph.

The only Hart I can find was a transport, listed in Paul H. Silverstone's Civil War Navies, 1855-1883: "Hart: Name may have been Ed R. Hart. Transport in Bayou Teche amd Berwick Bay, 1862-63. Sunk to avoid capture at Bayou Teche, 14 Apr 1863." (p. 174) She is not indicated to have carried armament. Her destruction is mentioned several times in ORN I:20, with General Banks apparently claiming credit for her destruction (he doesn't say so explicitly, but the way he puts it seems to claim credit), but nowhere is she called a gunboat... except on ibid., p. 380, where US Acting Volunteer Lieutenant Frederick Crocker reported on 28 July 1863 that "Deserters report that the rebel ironclad steamer Hart was nearly raised when the received news of the arrival of our gunboats, upon which it was immediately sunk again and now lies under water."

Way's Packet Directory mentions that the Ed R. Hart entered Confederate service, but says no more about it. (There are two other Harts, a Kate Hart and a John W. Hart, but the Kate was built a year after these events and the John W. was a late-19th century construction.)

So, I'm left puzzled. Any suggestions as to leads? :unsure:
 
Incidentally, it's entirely possible for a boat to have been tricked out with a bit of armor here and there for extra protection... that happened with the Queen of the West, the aforementioned Cotton, and even the schoolship CSS Patrick Henry (before she was a schoolship), but that doesn't necessarily make them "ironclads"... more along the lines of a "tinclad," really. But 3" of railroad iron is significant armor.
 
Mark, Lytle-Holdcamper gives the same info for Ed. R. Hart as Way, and was probably Way's source.

At 175 tons, Ed. R. Hart would have been around 130-135 feet long (-ish). I'll look to some newspapers.
 
Mark, Lytle-Holdcamper gives the same info for Ed. R. Hart as Way, and was probably Way's source.

At 175 tons, Ed. R. Hart would have been around 130-135 feet long. I'll look to some newspapers.
 
From a Limey's perspective - the Hart and the Stevens were one and the same ship.

1 Nov 1862
(Federal army correspondent's account.) fight near Brashear City.
the "flotilla" arrived on the 1st of November, at night, in view of Brashear City. The steamer Kinsman drawing too much water, Lieutenant Buchanan tried to pass the steamer Estrella with his supplementary force, but the Estrella grounding, he came to the entrance of the bay and gave chase to the Confederate States steamer Hart (transport), but without catching her.

10 Feb 1862
NY Times Report
One night, early In the last week, the Diana, with one hundred men of an Illinois regiment, made an attempt to destroy the rebel steamer Hart ; but owing to lowness of water, or some olber insurmountable Impediment, they did not get up to where tbe Hart lay, aad faued in their object. Two seceah females, who came to Brashear City under a flag of truce, reported tbat FOLLER. the Captain of tbe rebel boat Cotton, was not so seriously wouiaded as was originally thought, and that he has beenlpromoted.

14 April 1863
Your post
Sunk to avoid capture at Bayou Teche, 14 Apr 1863.

3 May 1863
Steamboats on Louisiana's Bayous - Carl A. Brasseaux
Union efforts to remove these navigational hazards had begun on May 3, when the transport ship Quinnebaug delivered a work detail to clear the wreck of the CSS Stevens, about two miles below New Iberia.

9 Oct 1863
Beecher, History of the 114th New York Volunteers
As soon as the obstructions in the Teche Bayou can be removed, which will be speedily, we shall advance. The wreck of the Stevens, evidently one of the last obstacles to be removed, was destroyed by explosive charges on October 9.

It makes no sense to rename her the CSS Stevens after being sunk. This must have happened during refit which could be any time between her escape in November 1862 to her sinking. She could have been thus named at the time of the attempted raid on her by the Illinois regiment in the February but the Union still referred to her as the Hart or where unaware of the renaming.

No ideas as to the Hart's origins.
 
358. Ed. R. Hart, steamboat, of New Orleans. Built at Paducah, Ky., 1860. 175 80/95 tons; 132 ft. 4 in. x 22 ft. 10 in. x 6 ft. 2 in. One deck, no masts, plain head, cabin above deck, side wheels. Previously enrolled (temporary) No. 9., Nov. 5, 1860 at Paducah, Ky.,
Enrolled Mo. 176, Nov. 1, 1860. Owners: Loring Virgin, 1/2, Hudson Brown, 1/2, Pointe Coupee Parish. Master: Loring Virgin.

-- Works Progress Administration, Ship Register sand Enrollments of New Orleans, Louisiana, Vol. V, 1851-1860.​
 
Okay... so, provisionally, we have a steamer Ed. R. Hart: a fairly ordinary-sized sidewheeler built at Paducah, operating in the New Orleans and bayou areas just before the war; taken into Confederate service as a transport; and with the demise of several of the Confederate gunboats in the area (like Queen of the West and Diana), it was decided to convert her to a gunboat, renaming her the Stevens; but before she was finished, Federal advances compelled her sinking in the Teche to block the river and to keep her out of enemy hands. Plausible.

I'm just pretty certain that this would have been an "ironclad" in the J.A. Cotton sense, rather than the CSS Arkansas sense: a riverboat tricked out with extra protection here and there, rather than a thoroughly rebuilt or constructed casemate ironclad... more along the lines of a Federal "tinclad." Sounds reasonable to me.
 
I'm just pretty certain that this would have been an "ironclad" in the J.A. Cotton sense, rather than the CSS Arkansas sense: a riverboat tricked out with extra protection here and there, rather than a thoroughly rebuilt or constructed casemate ironclad... more along the lines of a Federal "tinclad." Sounds reasonable to me.
Yeah, phrases like "ironclad" and "ram" got casually tossed around a lot, particularly by folks without firsthand knowledge of the vessels being described. Not unlike the tendency for any press mention of a modern naval vessel to describe it as a "battleship," or any armored vehicle as a "tank." Makes ya crazy a little.
 
Yeah, phrases like "ironclad" and "ram" got casually tossed around a lot, particularly by folks without firsthand knowledge of the vessels being described. Not unlike the tendency for any press mention of a modern naval vessel to describe it as a "battleship," or any armored vehicle as a "tank." Makes ya crazy a little.

Oh, definitely. One of the headaches I had for a while was people confusing an iron-hulled ship with an ironclad. With the metallurgical techniques of the time, a thin-skinned iron-hulled ship was actually more vulnerable to shot than a wooden-hulled ship, as the iron tended to be brittle and shatter, whereas wood had some resiliency. I've resorted to the imperfect but reasonably clear analogy of the difference between an automobile and a tank-- both made of steel, but one is designed to resist shot and the other isn't, other than in the most incidental fashion.
 
For those interested, Mr. Gaines' book is available online in pdf at: http://scubagonewild.com/documents/Encyclopedia of Civil War Shipwrecks - (Malestrom).pdf

A great resource.
Excellent, thanks. I recently had a contractor tell me I'd either have to get the house foundation reinforced, or give up my Amazon account. So electronic copies come in handy.

ETA: Just a preliminary skim of it so far, but the map of the Texas coast (p. 166) is seriously dodgy, with locations of Galveston and Velasco incorrect. Hope the others are better. Still, probably a great quick resource and (best of all) it includes citations for further investigation.
 
Hi folks - from a Limey's perspective.

I reckon this sort of confirms Frazier's citation?

The War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate armies (Volume Ser. 1 vol. 26:1) . (page 48 of 122). Daily Memoranda for Adjutant-General s Office, Department of the Gulf.
October 9-14. NEW ORLEANS.

October 9. At 5 p. m. yesterday, the major-general commanding, with staff, arrived at Madame Olivier s plantation, on banks of Bayou Teche, about 3 miles below New Iberia. Further navigation of the bayou interrupted by wreck of steamer Hart, burned by the rebels during last campaign, to prevent her falling into our hands.

At 11 a. m. commanding general and staff left to join General Franklin; stopped at wreck of Hart, and witnessed explosion of charge under her boilers, which was highly successful, and threw them clear of the bed and nearly on shore. Charge placed and exploded by Captain Bulkley.
 
Name: CSS Stevens
Type: Ironclad Gunboat Paddles: two, side-wheels Speed: 9 knots
Dimensions: 135ft x 30ft x 5ft, 289 tons
Guns : 2 - 32pdr SB, 2 - 24pdr SB
Armour: 3ins iron,
History


The cottonclad transport Ed. R .Hart was taken into CSN service and conversion started at the Olivier Plantation 2 miles below New Iberia on Bayou Teche in late November /early December 1862. She was scuttled incomplete 14/4/1863 to avoid capture, an attempt was made to raise her and move her down the Bayou to where she could be an effective obstruction, but union forces prevented this and she was sunk a second time, without being moved on 28/ 7 /1863.
 
I have an appearance drawing of this vessel, but it will not load, the systen says it's too big.
Well here is a small version, redrawn from a sketch by the late Ben Shuman.
CSS STEVENS.jpg
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top