Three POWs in 1864

TerryB

Lt. Colonel
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Location
Nashville TN
These men are from the 49th Tenn Inf. They are at Camp Douglass. Dated Dec 14, 1864. Not so ragged-looking to me.

49th Tenn Dec14 1864.webp
 
These men are from the 49th Tenn Inf. They are at Camp Douglass. Dated Dec 14, 1864. Not so ragged-looking to me.

Confederate P.O.W.s were clothed in a measure by a combination of the US Army and civilian donations, and some Confederate contribution. Also condemned US Army clothing, including overcoats, etc., sometimes overdyed a butternut color.

The clothing was necessarily provided in part because of the dirty and lousy garments worn from the field required disposal in many cases.

1782693640212.webp



1782691130864.webp



Captain William B. Haygood of the 44th Georgia Volunteers, wounded at Gettysburg and captured, wrote home to Georgia that the prisoners had been provided clothes...

1782696517044.webp



Besides the various government sources, the prisoners at Camp Douglas were allowed to write relatives in Tennessee or Kentucky, etc. to solicit supplies of clothing, shoes, etc. if they preferred.

1782691751963.webp

....
1782691833135.webp


When Confederate P.O.W.s were exchanged southward, they were often found among the better dressed men of their commands.

In February, 1865, Confederate General William N. Beall, reported that through the sale of cotton from the South in the Northern market, to benefit the support of the Confederate prisoners in Northern prisons, he had purchased for them a large quantity of clothing for them:

1782691390351.webp


In February, 1865, as the Spring approached, and as the renewal of prisoner exchanges was pressed, General Halleck ordered no more shipments of Confederate Cotton for sale Northward to benefit the prisoners with clothing, as they would have just been better clothed than otherwise when exchanged and returned to service...

1782692077718.webp


Some more Confederates photographed in prison:

1782690910756.webp
1782690935914.webp


The man's names are written on the back. One is Ed Read who wrote the inscription. Two on the left could be brothers. Name at the top looks like Armstrong. Only a few companies have online rosters, and i did not fine any of these men.

The men in the photograph are Charles H. Bailey and Charles D. Shanklin of Company A, 49th Tennessee, captured at Franklin in late 1864. And Edmond R. Read, of Company E of the 23rd Tennessee. Read had been captured at Chickamauga in September, 1863...



Confederate military records were spotty. Large numbers of men were poorly recorded, and large quantities of regimental records were lost at the close of the war. The US War Department compiled the surviving Confederate military records, so far as possible, in later decades. General Hall reporting to Congress that the Confederate personnel records were very incomplete, and the captured hospital records contained many names not otherwise found on surviving Confederate Army unit records...

1782698296724.webp



Here are the compiled service records of the three chaps in the photograph, compiled from CS Army rosters, and US POW records, etc.

Shanklin:

Bailey:

Read:
 
Last edited:
Those pictured three prisoners appear properly groomed, nourished and well clothed, considering at least two of them captured belonged to an army that was described as largely shoeless and raggedly clothed by the time of Franklin.

Given the high rates of death recorded at Camp Douglas, none of these names identified above appear on the register of Confederate soldiers who died in this prison camp, 1862 to 1865. (See https://dn790002.ca.archive.org/0/items/registerofconfed00unit/registerofconfed00unit.pdf @ pp. 36 - 42). It seems the three of them survived the war. (Although it's noted at page 37 of the register that the name of 'J. H. Bailey, Co. E, 48th TN, is recorded among the list of dead).
 
One account I read of Fort Delaware was that on the ferry the sergeant confiscated everything the POWs had with any US marking--blankets, buckles--anything. Then he tossed them in the harbor, so many a POW experienced the biting cold without a blanket until it could be supplied.
 
It was pretty common on both sides that prisoner guards who had not seen combat tended to treat enemy prisonars badly. When prisoners were under the control of fellow combat soldiers they were usually treated with sympathy.
That actually makes sense. Seeing the elephant changes a person and makes it a shared experience. I remember, in college, trying to explain the shared experience that combat veterans, North and South, felt with one another, and he just did not get it.
 
One account I read of Fort Delaware was that on the ferry the sergeant confiscated everything the POWs had with any US marking--blankets, buckles--anything. Then he tossed them in the harbor, so many a POW experienced the biting cold without a blanket until it could be supplied.
I had direct ancestor who was heard at Ft Delware. He had been at Johnsons Island, Point Lookout, then there. Being that he had been enlisted and then elected an officer he might have been a bit of trouble.

From what I understand the guards were particularly ruthless there.
 
Youtube also has one of these videos with Louisiana Confederates in it. They used the CDV image purported to be Morris Greenwall,having him walk toward the camera. Since I no longer believe that image to be Morris, I left a comment explaining my reasoning.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top